Op 15 mrt 2011, om 02:15 heeft Philip Balister het volgende geschreven:
> On 03/14/2011 08:44 PM, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
>>>
There also was a request for more general purpose OEDAM over the weekend,
maybe in parallel or before/after TSC meeting:
Any thoughts on that?
>>>
>
On 03/14/2011 06:15 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
On 03/14/2011 08:44 PM, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
There also was a request for more general purpose OEDAM over the
weekend,
maybe in parallel or before/after TSC meeting:
Any thoughts on that?
Most of the replies there are from TSC people who are
I will be
TK
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 03/14/2011 08:44 PM, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
>
>>
>>> There also was a request for more general purpose OEDAM over the
weekend,
maybe in parallel or before/after TSC meeting:
Any thoughts on that?
On 03/14/2011 08:44 PM, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
There also was a request for more general purpose OEDAM over the weekend,
maybe in parallel or before/after TSC meeting:
Any thoughts on that?
Most of the replies there are from TSC people who are going to be there
with the exceptions of yourse
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 09:15:22PM -0400, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 03/14/2011 08:44 PM, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote:
>>>
There also was a request for more general purpose OEDAM over the
weekend,
maybe in parallel or before/after TSC meeting:
Any thoughts on that?
>>>
>>> Mos
Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 3/14/11 8:47 PM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>
> There was already a defect covering this. The bug number is "797".
>
> In order to fix the problem a lock was added to the RPM generation.
> This lock should be preventing both RPM package generation and rootfs
> con
On 3/14/11 8:47 PM, Xu, Dongxiao wrote:
> Hi Richard,
There was already a defect covering this. The bug number is "797".
In order to fix the problem a lock was added to the RPM generation. This lock
should be preventing both RPM package generation and rootfs construction from
running at the sam
Hi Richard,
These days I found a race condition between building a recipe and
poky-image-minimal-initramfs, to reproduce it, you can try as:
1) Run "bitbake poky-image-sato-live". Build the full sato-live image until it
is successful.
2) Bump connman's PR (or some other sato recipe's PR).
3) Re
>
> > There also was a request for more general purpose OEDAM over the weekend,
> > maybe in parallel or before/after TSC meeting:
> >
> > Any thoughts on that?
>
> Most of the replies there are from TSC people who are going to be there
> with the exceptions of yourself and Mike. I'm ok with having
We are entering the final phases of Yocto 1.0 and plan to have another Release
Tracking meeting on Tuesday at 8am Pacific (recall that the US just moved our
clocks forward an hour on Sunday). Details are below:
Time/Date: Tuesday, March 15, 2011, 08:00 AM US Pacific Time
Dial in: 916-356-266
Hi,
The Yocto Project is in the final stages of the 1.0 release. This means
its time to kick off the post 1.0 planning process and see what things
we think we should be targeting for the release after this.
The various teams involved have been keeping a track of their ideas as
we went through 1.0
Hello Jessica,
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Zhang, Jessica
wrote:
> Leon Woestenberg wrote:
>> built, I wanted to test the Eclipse plug-in. After selecting Poky Tree
>> mode in the Yocto Tool configuration, I could not make it detect the
>> target; the drop down box remained empty.
>>
> Did
12 matches
Mail list logo
