Re: [yocto] Details on Bug #963 kernel tarball corruption.

2011-07-07 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 16:57 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > On 07/07/2011 02:16 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 13:34 -0700, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote: > > diff --git a/bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2/git.py b/bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2/git.py > > index f3bc793..7954f66 100644 > > --- a/bitbake/li

Re: [yocto] Details on Bug #963 kernel tarball corruption.

2011-07-07 Thread Darren Hart
On 07/07/2011 02:16 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 13:34 -0700, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote: >> I wanted to ping the list on this bug as I've drilled down into it and >> I see what's going on. These are the steps to reproduce it and I have >> some questions at the end >> >> The

Re: [yocto] Details on Bug #963 kernel tarball corruption.

2011-07-07 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 15:31 -0700, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote: > On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 13:34 -0700, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote: > > > > Shouldn't this always be the state of DL_DIR i.e. any change made to the > > contents of SRC_URI be exactly r

Re: [yocto] Details on Bug #963 kernel tarball corruption.

2011-07-07 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 13:34 -0700, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote: > I wanted to ping the list on this bug as I've drilled down into it and > I see what's going on. These are the steps to reproduce it and I have > some questions at the end > > The issue: The autobuilder has been serving up bad kern

Re: [yocto] Details on Bug #963 kernel tarball corruption.

2011-07-07 Thread Flanagan, Elizabeth
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 13:34 -0700, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote: > > Shouldn't this always be the state of DL_DIR i.e. any change made to the > contents of SRC_URI be exactly reflected in the same thing in DL_DIR? > If that were the case, I think i

Re: [yocto] Details on Bug #963 kernel tarball corruption.

2011-07-07 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 13:34 -0700, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote: > I wanted to ping the list on this bug as I've drilled down into it and > I see what's going on. These are the steps to reproduce it and I have > some questions at the end > > The issue: The autobuilder has been serving up bad kern

Re: [yocto] Details on Bug #963 kernel tarball corruption.

2011-07-07 Thread Flanagan, Elizabeth
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote: > So, do_kernel_checkout never even gets the chance to fix up the git repo. Quick clarification here. It never gets the chance to do it because do_unpack runs: git clone -s -n /srv/build/build/poky/build/downloads/git2/.srv.build.build.r

[yocto] Details on Bug #963 kernel tarball corruption.

2011-07-07 Thread Flanagan, Elizabeth
I wanted to ping the list on this bug as I've drilled down into it and I see what's going on. These are the steps to reproduce it and I have some questions at the end The issue: The autobuilder has been serving up bad kernel source tarballs. This is not an autobuilder issue. I've narrowed this