On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 18:37 -0700, Todd Cooper wrote:
> Can I suggest that Yocto put it on the futures list, but with a lower
> priority?
You can add it to the list on the wiki.
Which known set of prebuilt packages are you thinking we should be able
to build against?
Cheers,
Richard
___
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 19:05 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1323
> >>
> >> My question still stands even w/o it being in formal docs.
> >
> > FWIW, POKYMODE was replaced by TCMODE as part of the OE-Core changes.
> > I'd be intere
On 11-08-05 08:50 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
In the linux-yocto_3.0.bb recipe we have:
meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bb:SRC_URI =
"git://git.pokylinux.org/linux-yocto-3.0;protocol=git;nocheckout=1;branch=${KBRANCH},meta;name=machine,meta"
Should this really be git.yoctoproject.org?
Ye
I'm no expert, but would the use of something like Puppet make this job a lot
easier? A consultant is suggesting that we consider that tool for this purpose.
Define a particular set of packages in Puppet, and you can play around in your
sandbox to your heart's content. When you want to get back
On 08/05/2011 05:51 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-08-05 08:50 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
In the linux-yocto_3.0.bb recipe we have:
meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bb:SRC_URI =
"git://git.pokylinux.org/linux-yocto-3.0;protocol=git;nocheckout=1;branch=${KBRANCH},meta;name=machine,meta"
S
Hi All,
As we marching into our final milestone M4, which is bug fixing and
stabilization, the bug triage team did a bug scrub on the medium+low bugs
(since we've been closely monitoring the high and major bugs) + the new
multilib bugs to set a correct target for the bugs.
We urge people
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2011 10:58 PM, jingdong...@windriver.com wrote:
> From: Jingdong Lu
>
> Add pandaboard bsp
why not use meta-ti ?
>
> Jingdong Lu (1): pandaboard: add pandaboard bsp
>
> .../bsp/pandaboard/pandaboard-non_hardware.cfg | 30 ++
> .../
On 11-08-05 01:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2011 10:58 PM, jingdong...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Jingdong Lu
Add pandaboard bsp
why not use meta-ti ?
I'm hoping to not repeat all the discussions that we've had
around the beagle board here.
On 08/05/2011 01:38 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-08-05 01:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2011 10:58 PM, jingdong...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Jingdong Lu
Add pandaboard bsp
why not use meta-ti ?
I'm hoping to not repeat all the discussion
On 11-08-05 01:55 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
On 08/05/2011 01:38 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-08-05 01:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2011 10:58 PM, jingdong...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Jingdong Lu
Add pandaboard bsp
why not use meta-ti ?
Agenda:
1. Opens collection - 5 min (Song)
2. M3 release criteria review - 15 min (team)
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_v1.1_Release_Criteria
3. M4 plan & schedule - 15 min (Song)
4. Opens - 10 min
5. Action item Review - 5 min
* The team to review ALL bugs they own and do so
Is there some command to get the set of packages that will be attempted to be
built?
- k
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 16:55 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Is there some command to get the set of packages that will be attempted to be
> built?
bitbake -g will dump out a task-depends.dot file which shows which tasks
will run and the task interdependencies...
Cheers,
Richard
__
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 16:55 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Is there some command to get the set of packages that will be attempted to
>> be built?
>
> bitbake -g will dump out a task-depends.dot file which shows which tasks
> will run and the t
Jessica, the following 2 bugs have comments in the whiteboard asking not to
include them in 1.1 or lower the priority to low. I'm not sure if you guys
missed those or do not agree with the owners. Would you please double check
them?
684
932
Thanks,
Song
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [m
Song,
Thanks for pointing the white board info out.
684 is med enhancement, in general, people should focus on bug fixing.
Enhancements will be pushed out for post 1.1 unless people has no bug to work
on and has bandwidth to work on enhancement.
932 is waiting for upstream, I don't think
16 matches
Mail list logo