Re: [yocto] prebuilt pacakages

2011-08-05 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 18:37 -0700, Todd Cooper wrote: > Can I suggest that Yocto put it on the futures list, but with a lower > priority? You can add it to the list on the wiki. Which known set of prebuilt packages are you thinking we should be able to build against? Cheers, Richard ___

Re: [yocto] examples / docs on utilizing an external toolchain

2011-08-05 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 19:05 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > >> http://bugzilla.pokylinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1323 > >> > >> My question still stands even w/o it being in formal docs. > > > > FWIW, POKYMODE was replaced by TCMODE as part of the OE-Core changes. > > I'd be intere

Re: [yocto] Use of git.pokylinux.org vs git.yoctoproject.org in kernel recipe.

2011-08-05 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-05 08:50 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: In the linux-yocto_3.0.bb recipe we have: meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bb:SRC_URI = "git://git.pokylinux.org/linux-yocto-3.0;protocol=git;nocheckout=1;branch=${KBRANCH},meta;name=machine,meta" Should this really be git.yoctoproject.org? Ye

Re: [yocto] prebuilt pacakages

2011-08-05 Thread Ourada, Paul
I'm no expert, but would the use of something like Puppet make this job a lot easier? A consultant is suggesting that we consider that tool for this purpose. Define a particular set of packages in Puppet, and you can play around in your sandbox to your heart's content. When you want to get back

Re: [yocto] Use of git.pokylinux.org vs git.yoctoproject.org in kernel recipe.

2011-08-05 Thread Saul Wold
On 08/05/2011 05:51 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 11-08-05 08:50 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: In the linux-yocto_3.0.bb recipe we have: meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bb:SRC_URI = "git://git.pokylinux.org/linux-yocto-3.0;protocol=git;nocheckout=1;branch=${KBRANCH},meta;name=machine,meta" S

[yocto] M4 is bug fixing and stabilization milestone

2011-08-05 Thread Zhang, Jessica
Hi All, As we marching into our final milestone M4, which is bug fixing and stabilization, the bug triage team did a bug scrub on the medium+low bugs (since we've been closely monitoring the high and major bugs) + the new multilib bugs to set a correct target for the bugs. We urge people

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] meta/pandaboard: add pandaboard bsp

2011-08-05 Thread Khem Raj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/04/2011 10:58 PM, jingdong...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Jingdong Lu > > Add pandaboard bsp why not use meta-ti ? > > Jingdong Lu (1): pandaboard: add pandaboard bsp > > .../bsp/pandaboard/pandaboard-non_hardware.cfg | 30 ++ > .../

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] meta/pandaboard: add pandaboard bsp

2011-08-05 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-05 01:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/04/2011 10:58 PM, jingdong...@windriver.com wrote: From: Jingdong Lu Add pandaboard bsp why not use meta-ti ? I'm hoping to not repeat all the discussions that we've had around the beagle board here.

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] meta/pandaboard: add pandaboard bsp

2011-08-05 Thread Philip Balister
On 08/05/2011 01:38 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 11-08-05 01:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/04/2011 10:58 PM, jingdong...@windriver.com wrote: From: Jingdong Lu Add pandaboard bsp why not use meta-ti ? I'm hoping to not repeat all the discussion

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] meta/pandaboard: add pandaboard bsp

2011-08-05 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-08-05 01:55 PM, Philip Balister wrote: On 08/05/2011 01:38 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 11-08-05 01:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/04/2011 10:58 PM, jingdong...@windriver.com wrote: From: Jingdong Lu Add pandaboard bsp why not use meta-ti ?

[yocto] Agenda: Yocto Technical Team - (Tuesday, August 09, 2011 8:00 AM-9:00 AM (UTC-08:00) Pacific Time (US & Canada))

2011-08-05 Thread Liu, Song
Agenda:   1. Opens collection - 5 min (Song) 2. M3 release criteria review - 15 min (team) https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_v1.1_Release_Criteria 3. M4 plan & schedule - 15 min (Song) 4. Opens - 10 min 5. Action item Review - 5 min   * The team to review ALL bugs they own and do so

[yocto] way to get a package list?

2011-08-05 Thread Kumar Gala
Is there some command to get the set of packages that will be attempted to be built? - k ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] way to get a package list?

2011-08-05 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 16:55 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > Is there some command to get the set of packages that will be attempted to be > built? bitbake -g will dump out a task-depends.dot file which shows which tasks will run and the task interdependencies... Cheers, Richard __

Re: [yocto] way to get a package list?

2011-08-05 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 16:55 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: >> Is there some command to get the set of packages that will be attempted to >> be built? > > bitbake -g will dump out a task-depends.dot file which shows which tasks > will run and the t

Re: [yocto] M4 is bug fixing and stabilization milestone

2011-08-05 Thread Liu, Song
Jessica, the following 2 bugs have comments in the whiteboard asking not to include them in 1.1 or lower the priority to low. I'm not sure if you guys missed those or do not agree with the owners. Would you please double check them? 684 932 Thanks, Song From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [m

Re: [yocto] M4 is bug fixing and stabilization milestone

2011-08-05 Thread Zhang, Jessica
Song, Thanks for pointing the white board info out. 684 is med enhancement, in general, people should focus on bug fixing. Enhancements will be pushed out for post 1.1 unless people has no bug to work on and has bandwidth to work on enhancement. 932 is waiting for upstream, I don't think