Hi all,
The overall open bug trend increased a lot in last week. The new
submitted vs. fixed bug number is 64 vs. 52. Some fixed bugs are enhancement
bug, which are not calculated into WDD data. WDD number and Open Bug number are
938 and 188. Bug status of WW11 could be found on
https:/
Hi Jiajun,
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 08:49 +, Xu, Jiajun wrote:
> The overall open bug trend increased a lot in last week. The new
> submitted vs. fixed bug number is 64 vs. 52. Some fixed bugs are
> enhancement bug, which are not calculated into WDD data. WDD number
> and Open Bug number ar
Hello Scott,
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 08:25 -0700, Scott Garman wrote:
> Yes, this sounds worthy of filing a bug. Bonus points for patch
> submissions to fix it. ;)
I've filed the bug report for it.
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2138
Will try to add patch if possible.
Regards
> Hi Jiajun,
>
> On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 08:49 +, Xu, Jiajun wrote:
>> The overall open bug trend increased a lot in last week. The new
>> submitted vs. fixed bug number is 64 vs. 52. Some fixed bugs are
>> enhancement bug, which are not calculated into WDD data. WDD number
>> and Open Bug
Just did a git pull today on poky and meta-intel. I tried to rebuild
meta-sugarbay again and got a build error. Not sure why yet. Not
critical, just a spot check of things.
--
NOTE: package mesa-dri-2_7.11-r13.1: task do_configure: Succeeded
NOTE: Running task 1723 of 5148 (
>From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
>boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Jiajun
>Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 8:33 AM
>
>> Hi Jiajun,
>>
>> On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 08:49 +, Xu, Jiajun wrote:
>>> The overall open bug trend increased a lot in last week. The new
>>> submi
On 03/16/2012 04:27 PM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
> Several people have indicated a quick start section like Robert's wiki page
> would be good in the YP QS. I agree that the idea of diverting the super
> user to a shortened, more concise section that let's you kick the tires of
> Yocto is a
Also, the Note and Tip blocks formatting has improved, but I still find
it distracting that the title font for these is still larger than any of
the heading fonts in the rest of the document.
--
Darren
On 03/16/2012 04:27 PM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
> Several people have indicated a quick start
On 03/19/2012 09:18 AM, Stewart, David C wrote:
>> From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
>> boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Jiajun
>> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 8:33 AM
>> BTW, when I check the open bug data, I find that a new variable is introduced
>> with new bugzilla
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012, Darren Hart wrote:
> On 03/16/2012 04:27 PM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
> > Several people have indicated a quick start section like Robert's wiki page
> > would be good in the YP QS. I agree that the idea of diverting the super
> > user to a shortened, more concise section
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 15:32 +, Xu, Jiajun wrote:
> > Hi Jiajun,
> >
> > On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 08:49 +, Xu, Jiajun wrote:
> >>The overall open bug trend increased a lot in last week. The new
> >> submitted vs. fixed bug number is 64 vs. 52. Some fixed bugs are
> >> enhancement bug, whic
I could replace the Beagleboard xM machine with qemux86. The introductory bit
up front provides minimal inconvenience to the reader to quickly hop down to
the section via the link.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 201
I find that irritating as well and will try and look into changing that.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 11:09 AM
To: Rifenbark, Scott M
Cc: Robert P. J. Day; Yocto discussion list
Subject: Re: [yocto] my idea of a q
On 03/19/2012 10:17 AM, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
> I could replace the Beagleboard xM machine with qemux86. The
> introductory bit up front provides minimal inconvenience to the
"Minimal inconvenience" is a subjective assessment of course. I find it
very annoying to slog through that much materi
On 03/18/2012 06:18 PM, Lu, Lianhao wrote:
Hi Saul,
How about this patch's merging status?
Missed it becase it went to the wrong list! should go to the
p...@yoctoproject.org list in the future.
Sau!
Best Regards,
Lianhao
Lu, Lianhao wrote on 2012-03-14:
Set the PREFERRED_VERSION of lttn
No problem seen here...
NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 4825 tasks of which 474 didn't need to be
rerun and all succeeded.
For reference, here are the poky and meta-intel commits I built with:
poky/master:
commit a9873f12e5ba11e1307440901d07e9642e9f53bf
Author: Richard Purdie
Date: Sun Mar 18
On 2012-03-19 10:02, jfabernathy wrote:
Just did a git pull today on poky and meta-intel. I tried to rebuild
meta-sugarbay again and got a build error. Not sure why yet. Not critical, just
a spot check of things.
--
NOTE: package mesa-dri-2_7.11-r13.1: task do_configure: Succe
On 03/19/2012 02:55 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-19 10:02, jfabernathy wrote:
Just did a git pull today on poky and meta-intel. I tried to rebuild
meta-sugarbay again and got a build error. Not sure why yet. Not
critical, just a spot check of things.
--
NOTE: package mes
On 2012-03-19 12:59, jfabernathy wrote:
On 03/19/2012 02:55 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-19 10:02, jfabernathy wrote:
Just did a git pull today on poky and meta-intel. I tried to rebuild
meta-sugarbay again and got a build error. Not sure why yet. Not critical, just
a spot check of thing
On 03/19/2012 03:03 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-19 12:59, jfabernathy wrote:
On 03/19/2012 02:55 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-19 10:02, jfabernathy wrote:
Just did a git pull today on poky and meta-intel. I tried to
rebuild meta-sugarbay again and got a build error. Not sure why
ye
On 2012-03-19 13:04, jfabernathy wrote:
On 03/19/2012 03:03 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-19 12:59, jfabernathy wrote:
On 03/19/2012 02:55 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-19 10:02, jfabernathy wrote:
Just did a git pull today on poky and meta-intel. I tried to rebuild
meta-sugarbay aga
On 03/19/2012 03:13 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-19 13:04, jfabernathy wrote:
On 03/19/2012 03:03 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-19 12:59, jfabernathy wrote:
On 03/19/2012 02:55 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-19 10:02, jfabernathy wrote:
Just did a git pull today on poky and meta-i
Agenda
* Opens collection - 5 min (Song)
* Yocto 1.2 M4 status and release criteria review - 20 min (Song/Team)
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_v1.2_Status
* SWAT team rotation: Paul->Jessica
* Opens - 10 min
* Team Sharing - 20 min
-Original Appointment-
Conferen
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 10:13 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On 03/19/2012 09:18 AM, Stewart, David C wrote:
> >> From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
> >> boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Jiajun
> >> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 8:33 AM
>
> >> BTW, when I check the open bug da
On 03/19/2012 01:18 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 10:13 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>> On 03/19/2012 09:18 AM, Stewart, David C wrote:
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Jiajun
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012
On 2012-03-19 13:25, jfabernathy wrote:
On 03/19/2012 03:13 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-19 13:04, jfabernathy wrote:
On 03/19/2012 03:03 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-19 12:59, jfabernathy wrote:
On 03/19/2012 02:55 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-19 10:02, jfabernathy wrote:
Ju
On 03/19/2012 04:25 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-19 13:25, jfabernathy wrote:
On 03/19/2012 03:13 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-19 13:04, jfabernathy wrote:
On 03/19/2012 03:03 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-19 12:59, jfabernathy wrote:
On 03/19/2012 02:55 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 03/19/2012 01:22 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 03/19/2012 01:18 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 10:13 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
On 03/19/2012 09:18 AM, Stewart, David C wrote:
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Jiajun
S
On 2012-03-19 14:49, jfabernathy wrote:
On 03/19/2012 04:25 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-19 13:25, jfabernathy wrote:
On 03/19/2012 03:13 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-19 13:04, jfabernathy wrote:
On 03/19/2012 03:03 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-19 12:59, jfabernathy wrote:
On
On 03/19/2012 05:27 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-19 14:49, jfabernathy wrote:
On 03/19/2012 04:25 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-19 13:25, jfabernathy wrote:
On 03/19/2012 03:13 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-03-19 13:04, jfabernathy wrote:
On 03/19/2012 03:03 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
30 matches
Mail list logo
