On Fri, 23 Mar 2012, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote:
Okay - I dug into this a bit with the help of Scott Garman. He
uncovered a bit in the BitBake changelog. It states the following:
By default it will now only pass certain whitelisted variables into
the data store. If BB_PRESERVE_ENV is set
finished perusing ref manual variable glossary and here's my list of
variables that would appear to be dead and should be dropped from the
glossary:
http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/OE-Core#Dead.28.3F.29_variables.2C_to_be_dropped_from_glossary
unless there are objections or anyone
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 05:27 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
finished perusing ref manual variable glossary and here's my list of
variables that would appear to be dead and should be dropped from the
glossary:
Delete reference manual glossary entries of obviously dead/renamed
variables:
* PACKAGE_SUMMARY
* PACKAGE_DESCRIPTION
* POKY_EXTRA_INSTALL (renamed to CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL)
* POKYMODE (renamed to TCMODE)
* POKYLIBC (renamed to TCLIBC)
* SHELLCMDS
* TERMCMD
* TERMCMDRUN
In addition,
It is worth noting and the state of the variables is being worked. I have
several noted that I need to document. Understanding which ones are deprecated
will be good too. Thanks for the diligence Robert.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Robert P. J. Day [mailto:rpj...@crashcourse.ca]
We should have Richard Purdie view and comment on this list before a patch is
applied to remove them. He has voiced concern in the past for completely
removing variables.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On
Behalf
Ahhh... I need to read all the emails in my inbox before responding :)
Thanks Richard.
-Original Message-
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On
Behalf Of Richard Purdie
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 5:53 AM
To: Robert P. J. Day
Cc: Yocto
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 17:45 -0500, Peter Seebach wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:20:08 +
Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Friday 23 March 2012 02:16:35 Peter Seebach wrote:
Still really weird to me that I can't reproduce this outside of hob.
I am pretty sure
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 17:15 +, Richard Purdie wrote:
What puzzles me is we get this value from envbackup[key] =
os.environ.get(PSEUDO_PREFIX) so its already not in the environment.
So basically if we read PSEUDO_PREFIX from the environment we get
nothing. If we unset the value back to
