Hi,
I had similar errors building an OE image for my Micro2440 board under
archlinux x86-64. I solved the problem by installing gcc-multlib
(https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch64_FAQ#Multilib_Repository_-_Multilib_Project).
But, I tried to bake gconf with yocto just adding MACHINE and
The following changes since commit 002d29bc605d7c2d02e4cf20a43c5277c15f5597:
[opkg-utils] fix install fail problem Thanks for khorben's patch :-)
https://docs.openmoko.org/trac/attachment/ticket/2072/patch-opkg-utils_Makefile_install_path.diff
(2008-11-03 03:59:59 +)
are available in
From: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
* If we're building an image and some package rebuilds while this is
happening some package can be removed/added to the ipk deploy
directory. The image will not depend on this package so we can
safely ignore these cases rather than
From: Enrico Scholz enrico.sch...@sigma-chemnitz.de
* The st_mtime attribute (which is a float) is compared against a value
from the timestamp database, which was stored as an integer there.
* When working on a filesystem with precise timestamps the comparision
will fail nearly everytime
From: Scott Anderson o...@saaworld.com
* Essentially, the problem is that arfile.py is splitting the ar header with
white-space instead of fixed-width fields, so two fields would get treated
as a single field. This makes things better than before as it now honors
the fixed field widths.
From: Christopher Larson kerg...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson kerg...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
opkg-list-fields |2 +-
opkg-make-index |2 +-
opkg-show-deps|2 +-
opkg-unbuild |2 +-
opkg-update-index |2 +-
5
Hi all,
Do we have enough information to make a decision about the meta-yocto
layer? I don't understand all the technical details, but I am inclined to
make it non-deletable in Hob (i.e. it is not possible to delete this layer
in Hob).
What do you think?
Belen
On 27/03/2012 17:56, Joshua Lock
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 19:05 +0800, Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
Hi all,
Do we have enough information to make a decision about the meta-yocto
layer? I don't understand all the technical details, but I am inclined to
make it non-deletable in Hob (i.e. it is not possible to delete this layer
in
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 16:50 -0700, Rudolf Streif wrote:
Thanks, Richard. Clearer now but not entirely.
BBMASK removes recipes from being parsed. It does not
remove them from
images although that would I guess be an indirect result
since
On 20/03/2012 16:56, Khem Raj wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Paul Eggleton
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote:
IIRC the thread ended with Khem asking if UCLIBC_HAS_RESOLVER_SUPPORT='y' was
in the uclibc configuration, the implication being that dn_comp is unavailable
unless that is
I will take care of this.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Richard Purdie [mailto:richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 6:48 AM
To: Rudolf Streif; Rifenbark, Scott M
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] tentative list of vars to be dropped from
Op 27 mrt. 2012, om 17:53 heeft Kamble, Nitin A het volgende geschreven:
Hi Chris,
Here is the recipe we have in yocto-project for openssl projects to be
incorporated into embedded Linux distributions.
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/tree/meta/recipes-connectivity/openssl
I've just received an screenshot showing how Hob looks like in the build
appliance, and I'd like to file an enhancement to include a GTK theme that will
show Hob with a better face.
Does anybody know how should I file it? Bugzilla under build system general
and indicating 'build appliance' in
Great! Care to tell us a bit about it, or will we have to hold our breath
until you submit the patches? ;)
Belen
On 29/03/2012 13:00, Xu, Dongxiao dongxiao...@intel.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 19:05 +0800, Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
Hi all,
Do we have enough information to make a
Belen,
That should work.
Thanks,
Jessica
-Original Message-
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On
Behalf Of Barros Pena, Belen
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 8:16 AM
To: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: [yocto] filing enhancement for build
Hi,
I am building an image using ipk packages. The minimal images all seem
to set ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND to remove_packaging_data_files, which
(for all package management systems) recursively removes the packages
directory in /var/lib. This seems a bit harsh considering that some
packages may
From: Kishore Bodke kishore.k.bo...@intel.com
Include the PVR Graphics driver to the Cedartrail BSP.
These patch set will add the PVR Graphics driver and
update the SRCREVs for both pvr and nopvr.
Signed-off-by: Kishore Bodke kishore.k.bo...@intel.com
---
conf/machine/include/ia32-base.inc
From: Kishore Bodke kishore.k.bo...@intel.com
Hi,
These patch set updates the existing Cedartrail BSP with PVR Graphics Driver
and
also the SRCREVS to build with both pvr and nopvr images.
pvr version supports EFI and pcbios.
no-pvr (VESA Graphics) version does not support EFI.
Please pull
Scott,
That's great. The dev manual is very comprehensive and at the right level
of detail. I think many new as well as more experienced users of YP will
appreciate it. From a quick read the only suggestion I have for now is to
place the section on Customizing Images before the section on Adding
On Thursday 29 March 2012 14:20:44 John Toomey wrote:
On 20/03/2012 16:56, Khem Raj wrote:
go into the uclibc build tree and like kernel or busybox it will have
a .config and grok that. If this is disabled then enable it in
uClibc.distro file under uclibc recipes dir and rebuild uclibc.
Rudi,
Thanks for taking the time to look this stuff over. I will place customizing
images ahead of adding packages in the dev manual.
I will dig into the other issues and see what I can get in the way of
information from the development team.
Scott
From: rstr...@linuxfoundation.org
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Paul Eggleton
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Thursday 29 March 2012 14:20:44 John Toomey wrote:
On 20/03/2012 16:56, Khem Raj wrote:
go into the uclibc build tree and like kernel or busybox it will have
a .config and grok that. If this is disabled
I got a question about how to change the startup application with Yocto for
images generated with Yocto. And I googled it and landed on this page:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/FAQ:How_do_I_change_and_add_startup_scripts.
Pretty good, someone was thinking about the same thing. But this
somewhere, i'm assuming there's a decent explanation of the
different bitbake assignment variations (=, ?=, ??=), but i don't
immediately see it, and i think it's pretty important that that's
explained properly. pointer?
rday
--
On 3/29/12 4:47 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
somewhere, i'm assuming there's a decent explanation of the
different bitbake assignment variations (=, ?=, ??=), but i don't
immediately see it, and i think it's pretty important that that's
explained properly. pointer?
rday
The bitbake
Robert,
I don't think that the YP manuals do. That's more Bitbake. However, here is
some copied out of my docs. (List excuse the formatting. It's copied from
an HTML page.)
-
*Variable Setting (=)*
Set a variable by assigning it a value using the *=* sign. Values must
be
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 3/29/12 4:47 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
somewhere, i'm assuming there's a decent explanation of the
different bitbake assignment variations (=, ?=, ??=), but i don't
immediately see it, and i think it's pretty important that that's
First 5 patches are taken from oe-core.
Then there are some cleanups and fixes for issues I've found while looking
for cause of very long package-index calls.
Some patches uses compatible changes from 2to3 (tested with python2.7), but
python3 support is not 100% complete, but were closer.
And
From: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
* If we're building an image and some package rebuilds while this is
happening some package can be removed/added to the ipk deploy
directory. The image will not depend on this package so we can
safely ignore these cases rather than
From: Enrico Scholz enrico.sch...@sigma-chemnitz.de
* The st_mtime attribute (which is a float) is compared against a value
from the timestamp database, which was stored as an integer there.
* When working on a filesystem with precise timestamps the comparision
will fail nearly everytime
From: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
opkg.py |8
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opkg.py b/opkg.py
index 3fda9b5..8ddc8b8 100644
--- a/opkg.py
+++ b/opkg.py
From: Scott Anderson o...@saaworld.com
* Essentially, the problem is that arfile.py is splitting the ar header with
white-space instead of fixed-width fields, so two fields would get treated
as a single field. This makes things better than before as it now honors
the fixed field widths.
From: Christopher Larson kerg...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson kerg...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
opkg-list-fields |2 +-
opkg-make-index |2 +-
opkg-show-deps|2 +-
opkg-unbuild |2 +-
opkg-update-index |2 +-
5
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
opkg.py |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opkg.py b/opkg.py
index 8ddc8b8..56e774d 100644
--- a/opkg.py
+++ b/opkg.py
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ import tempfile
import os
import sys
import glob
-import
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
arfile.py | 16 +---
opkg.py | 11 ++-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arfile.py b/arfile.py
index 8291a2d..7a695c6 100644
--- a/arfile.py
+++ b/arfile.py
@@ -40,13 +40,13 @@ class
* python3 returns them as byte sequence
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
arfile.py |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arfile.py b/arfile.py
index 7a695c6..92ffee0 100644
--- a/arfile.py
+++ b/arfile.py
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ class ArFile:
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
arfile.py|2 +-
opkg-compare-indexes | 10 +-
opkg-make-index | 18 +-
opkg-show-deps | 12 ++--
opkg-update-index|2 +-
opkg.py |8
6 files
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
arfile.py |4 ++--
opkg-make-index |4 ++--
opkg.py |2 +-
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arfile.py b/arfile.py
index 9149387..3f797a8 100644
--- a/arfile.py
+++ b/arfile.py
@@ -54,11
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
opkg-make-index | 20 ++--
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opkg-make-index b/opkg-make-index
index 997f286..e0844a7 100755
--- a/opkg-make-index
+++ b/opkg-make-index
@@ -131,11 +131,11 @@
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
opkg-make-index |3 +--
opkg-show-deps | 11 +--
opkg.py |5 ++---
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opkg-make-index b/opkg-make-index
index e0844a7..898a2f6 100755
---
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
opkg.py | 13 ++---
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opkg.py b/opkg.py
index 856e057..299e84e 100644
--- a/opkg.py
+++ b/opkg.py
@@ -161,7 +161,10 @@ class Package:
control =
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
arfile.py |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arfile.py b/arfile.py
index 3f797a8..88ace46 100644
--- a/arfile.py
+++ b/arfile.py
@@ -131,5 +131,8 @@ if __name__ == __main__:
tarf =
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
opkg-make-index | 17 +
opkg.py |4 ++--
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opkg-make-index b/opkg-make-index
index 898a2f6..02c425f 100755
--- a/opkg-make-index
+++
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
opkg.py |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opkg.py b/opkg.py
index 84583be..6c39616 100644
--- a/opkg.py
+++ b/opkg.py
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ class Package:
while 1:
if not line: break
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
opkg.py | 19 +++
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opkg.py b/opkg.py
index 6c39616..9daff9e 100644
--- a/opkg.py
+++ b/opkg.py
@@ -182,14 +182,17 @@ class Package:
def
* there is no self.meta_dir before self._setup_scratch_area
* control file needs to be closed before packing it with tar, otherwise it
could be empty
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
opkg.py |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
* description field in oe-core sometimes has extra line-feeds and is long
* extra line-feeds breaks read_control, because empty line means next Package
* long descriptions should be wrapped and properly indented, so they are parsed
back properly
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
---
opkg.py | 12 +++-
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opkg.py b/opkg.py
index 2294160..27cbc2a 100644
--- a/opkg.py
+++ b/opkg.py
@@ -509,11 +509,21 @@ if __name__ == __main__:
just to be absolutely clear so i don't misunderstand:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Rudolf Streif wrote:
VAR = value
In this example, VAR is set to value.
so the = assignment will *always* set the variable to that value,
regardless of what combination of =, ?= or ??= has come before it,
I got a question about how to change the startup application with Yocto for
images generated with Yocto.
And I googled it and landed on this page:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/FAQ:How_do_I_change_and_add_startup_scripts.
Pretty good, someone
was thinking about the same thing. But
Hi All,
As we're approaching 1.2 release, the bug triage team comes up an addendum to
the existing process. We're marking certain medium+normal bugs with a tag
[1.2] in the whiteboard area. This means these bugs are considered a desired
to be fixed in the 1.2 release timeframe. So for
1. yes, = will always override any prior ?= or ??= and any subsequent ?= or
??= will not change the setting anymore.
2. yes, a ?= following a ??= will set the variable. Only a = will be
override the setting of the ?=. Any following ?= and ??= will not change
the setting.
3. yes, a ?= or =
52 matches
Mail list logo
