Hi all,
This is the weekly bug trend for WW13. The new submitted vs. fixed bug
number is 45 vs. 66. By comparing with WW12, open bug number for Major,
Normal increased a lot. WDD number and Open Bug number are 866 and 174. Bug
status of WW13 could be found on
The patch is to change local.conf to allow Hob change BB threads and pmake.
Please review.
In the current local.conf, BB_NUMBER_THREADS and PARALLEL_MAKE are assigned
by '=', which overwrites the values set from the Hob. To avoid that, use '?='
instead.
The following changes since commit
In the current local.conf, BB_NUMBER_THREADS and PARALLEL_MAKE are assigned
by '=', which overwrites the values set from the Hob. To avoid that, use '?='
instead.
[Yocto #2210]
Signed-off-by: Shane Wang shane.w...@intel.com
---
meta-yocto/conf/local.conf.sample |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2
Thanks, Paul. What happens if the DISTRO is set to empty? Will the image
build?
Belen
On 30/03/2012 13:19, Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Friday 30 March 2012 11:26:15 Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
On 30/03/2012 07:32, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012
On Monday 02 April 2012 10:48:23 Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
Thanks, Paul. What happens if the DISTRO is set to empty? Will the image
build?
Yes it will still build, but it will use a default distro policy defined within
OE-Core; this may imply some minor differences in build output.
Cheers,
On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 21:08 -0700, Matthew McClintock wrote:
I think we should consider a standard way of integrating layers and
other bits. One method is (and I'm not recommending it) using 'git
submodules' - another is 'androids repo command'. If all the distros
(poky, angstrom, MEL, etc)
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 17:23 +0800, Shane Wang wrote:
In the current local.conf, BB_NUMBER_THREADS and PARALLEL_MAKE are assigned
by '=', which overwrites the values set from the Hob. To avoid that, use '?='
instead.
[Yocto #2210]
Signed-off-by: Shane Wang shane.w...@intel.com
---
For those attending the BSP Summit remotely, I have also set up an IRC
channel for backchat. The channel is #yocto-bsp-summit on freenode.
Join with your favorite IRC client or go to:
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#yocto-bsp-summit
--
Jeff Osier-Mixon http://jefro.net/blog
Yocto Project
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 07:27:16PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
[snip]
You've mentioned preferring to do this with set versions of bitbake and
oe-core. Do oe-core and bitbake maintain stable branches? I didn't think
they did. This makes it difficult to stabilize a release, and poky
serves this
Agenda
* Opens collection - 5 min (Song)
* Yocto 1.2 M4 status - 20 min (Song/Team)
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Project_v1.2_Status
* SWAT team rotation: Paul - Saul.
* Opens - 10 min
* Team Sharing - 20 min
-Original Appointment-
Conference details
Conference name:
If any review of the package requirements as listed in the QS occurs, please
review them from
http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/yocto-project-qs/yocto-project-qs.html#packages.
This represents the latest QS version being prepared for 1.2 release.
Thanks,
Scott
-Original
Robert P. J. Day wrote on 2012-03-26:
currently, ch 5 of the reference manual claims that a generated
meta-toolchain tarball should be unpacked under /opt/poky, which
might be *historically* correct but i just baked a meta-toolchain and
its tarball contents are all prefixed with
12 matches
Mail list logo
