On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Kamble, Nitin A
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
>> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 1:20 PM
>> To: Kamble, Nitin A
>> Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
>> Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] remove snb rc6 pat
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 1:20 PM
> To: Kamble, Nitin A
> Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] remove snb rc6 patches from v3.4 kernel
> repository
>
> On 12-06-11 03:38 PM, nit
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
>> Would the correct solution be to break eglibc-mtrace out into a separate
>> recipe.
>>
> I am not sure if this would be more correct or have the PACKAGES contain
> something like ${EGLIBC_PACKAGE_MTRACE}, which could the be over-ridden by
> the
On 06/11/2012 03:07 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 04:02 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/08/2012 03:23 PM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
>>> From: Nitin A Kamble
>>>
>>> perl needs eglibc to build.
>>> The presence of runtime dependency of
>>> perl for eglibc-mtrace caused bitbake t
On 06/08/2012 04:02 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
On 06/08/2012 03:23 PM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamble
perl needs eglibc to build.
The presence of runtime dependency of
perl for eglibc-mtrace caused bitbake to build perl before eglibc,
which causes build failure of perl with
Agenda:
* Opens collection - 5 min (Song)
* 1.2.1 update - 5 min (ScottG)
* 1.1.2 update - 5 min (Josh/Beth)
* Yocto 1.3 status - 10 min (Song/team)
* LTSI discussion - 10 min (Sean/Bruce/team)
* SWAT team rotation: Jessica -> Dexuan
* Opens - 5 min
* Team sharing - 20 min
-Original Appoin
From: Nitin A Kamble
The sandybridge rc6 patches are part of the released v3.4 kernel.
Hence there is no need to keep these patches in the 3.4 linux
yocto kernel repository.
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble
---
.../features/tmp/rc6/rc6-kernel-params.patch | 81
meta/c
From: Nitin A Kamble
These patches are already part of v3.4 kernel sources. So there is no need to
maintain them in the yocto linux 3.4 repository.
Thanks,
Nitin
PS: this is resend of earlier pull request with proper email formats.
The following changes since commit 3fd089debe624c642d7b4d9363f8
On 12-06-11 03:38 PM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamble
These patches are already part of v3.4 kernel sources. So there is no need to
maintain them in the yocto linux 3.4 repository.
dropped. They obviously weren't reference anyway.
I assume you'll be doing an associated me
From: Nitin A Kamble
The sandybridge rc6 patches are part of the released v3.4 kernel.
Hence there is no need to keep these patches in the 3.4 linux
yocto kernel repository.
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble
---
.../features/tmp/rc6/rc6-kernel-params.patch | 81
meta/c
From: Nitin A Kamble
These patches are already part of v3.4 kernel sources. So there is no need to
maintain them in the yocto linux 3.4 repository.
Thanks,
Nitin
The following changes since commit 3fd089debe624c642d7b4d9363f853021d1675b2:
checkpoint dir: meta (2012-06-06 16:24:42 -0400)
ar
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day
>
> ---
>
> even though redirection takes care of this, might as well be
> accurate.
>
> diff --git a/README b/README
> index 0ab0dbf..06b1ea6 100644
> --- a/README
> +++ b/README
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ e.g
On Monday 11 June 2012 06:53:32 Khem Raj wrote:
> On 6/11/2012 12:29 AM, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> > I find that -c clean does not work very well, afterward the package
> > gets recompiled but instead of the actual package packages being
> > rebuilt, an earlier version of the packages gets pulled out
On 06/10/2012 08:42 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
> From: Tom Zanussi
>
> Remove 2.6.37 .bbappends to match recent oe-core linux-yocto-2.6.37 removal.
For the series:
Acked-by: Darren Hart
>
> The following changes since commit a2c22fb791eb70b230a5f8169d3580f4f3a4f967:
> Kishore Bodke
Dear Mihai,
I would expect that grub should be installed in core-image-minimal-qemux86.ext3
Grub couldn't be found when running the image with runqemu.
Any other ideas?
-Original Message-
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On
Behalf Of Mihai L
On 6/11/2012 5:12 PM, Jürgen Messerer wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
> I have the following problem. I have created with yocto a core-image-minimal
> for x86 which I could test with qemu.
>
>
>
> later I added the following lines to conf/local.conf at the end according to
> the manual chapter 4.2.4:
>
Hi,
Here's the link to the wikipage for the design for WebHob that we've been
working on here at the London office.
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_1.3_Web_Hob
The direct link to the video screencast is here:
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/images/9/9c/Yocto_webHob.1.9_screencast.0.
Hi
I have the following problem. I have created with yocto a core-image-minimal
for x86 which I could test with qemu.
later I added the following lines to conf/local.conf at the end according to
the manual chapter 4.2.4:
IMAGE_INSTALL_append = " bash"
IMAGE_INSTALL_append = " strace"
IMAGE_INST
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/11/2012 12:29 AM, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/06/12 12:30, Chris Tapp wrote:
>> I've been building the 3.1.9 Raspberry Pi kernel under Denzil
>> using the meta layer at
>> https://github.com/djwillis/meta-raspberrypi. This uses a kernel
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 12:10 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> To support the basic workflow of trivial patches:
>
> git format-patch HEAD~.. ; git send-email --to f...@bar.com 0001-foo.patch
>
> We don't want git status reporting on patches lying in the top
> level dir in this case.
Merged to mast
Sounds good: thanks, Ross.
Belen
On 08/06/2012 21:24, "Burton, Ross" wrote:
>On 8 June 2012 17:41, Joshua Lock wrote:
>>> Joshua: if you have a rough idea of the things that
>>> will need to be changed from the work you did before the 1.2 release,
>>> please let us know.
>
>I think it's fair t
Thanks, Joshua.
Belen
On 08/06/2012 17:41, "Joshua Lock" wrote:
>On 08/06/12 07:28, Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
> > Vanilla 5 - branded 0 :)
> >
> > Shane, Dongxiao and Alex: from an implementation point of view, I guess
> > this means eliminating any hardcoded UI-related values (button
>colours
Hi all,
This is the weekly bug trend for WW23. The new submitted vs. fixed bug
number is 39 vs. 25. WDD number and Open Bug number increased a lot, as 1103
and 222. Bug status of WW23 could be found on
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Bug_Trend.
Best Regards,
Jiajun
___
On 11 Jun 2012, at 08:29, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/06/12 12:30, Chris Tapp wrote:
>> I've been building the 3.1.9 Raspberry Pi kernel under Denzil using
>> the meta layer at https://github.com/djwillis/meta-raspberrypi. This
>> uses a kernel recipe based on the git repository at
>> h
<>
Added poky and oe-core.
anyone?
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Jegan Chandru wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Framework - poky-denzil-7.0
> arch - x86_64
>
> Is there anyway to get patched source tar file for gcc while building
> srpm? I have checked the srpms created and found gcc srpms has only the
> log
Hi,
On 10/06/12 12:30, Chris Tapp wrote:
> I've been building the 3.1.9 Raspberry Pi kernel under Denzil using
> the meta layer at https://github.com/djwillis/meta-raspberrypi. This
> uses a kernel recipe based on the git repository at
> https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/commits/rpi-patches.
>
26 matches
Mail list logo
