So that about a disto refusing this and possibly other BSP layers ?
Should the disto.conf select of nativesdk be made machine specific on all
machines in meta-fsl-ppc ? And one added target after a meta-fsl-ppc rebase
would break stuff, I guess.
Br
David
Sent from Android
-Original
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Tested this on FishRiver hardware, and it works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
---
.../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.4.bbappend |8
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
---
meta-fishriver/conf/machine/fishriver.conf |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta-fishriver/conf/machine/fishriver.conf
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
---
meta-emenlow/conf/machine/emenlow.conf |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta-emenlow/conf/machine/emenlow.conf
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
This is tested on the HuronRiver (sugarbay laptop) platform, and it works as
expected.
Signed-Off-By: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
---
.../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.4.bbappend |9 +
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+),
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
---
meta-sugarbay/conf/machine/sugarbay.conf |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta-sugarbay/conf/machine/sugarbay.conf
typo refusing = reusing.
-Original Message-
From: David Nyström [david.nyst...@enea.com]
Received: Friday, 06 Jul 2012, 12:49
To: yocto@yoctoproject.org [yocto@yoctoproject.org]; raj.k...@gmail.com
[raj.k...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [yocto] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH 2/2] fsl.conf:Let
Something has changes very recently. I was building with a fresh clone
of poky and meta-intel. checked out Denzil on both. only modified to
support the meta-n450 layer, the parallel options and the local download
directory.
I got an error compiling the kernel. It didn't fail yesterday
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:20 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
Something has changes very recently. I was building with a fresh clone
of poky and meta-intel. checked out Denzil on both. only modified to
support the meta-n450 layer, the parallel options and the local download
directory.
Are you
On 07/06/2012 10:44 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:20 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
Something has changes very recently. I was building with a fresh clone
of poky and meta-intel. checked out Denzil on both. only modified to
support the meta-n450 layer, the parallel options and
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:47 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On 07/06/2012 10:44 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:20 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
Something has changes very recently. I was building with a fresh clone
of poky and meta-intel. checked out Denzil on both. only modified
Hi everyone,
Here's the latest update (2.0) from the London team on the WebHob design
https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Web_Hob_Design
There's a PDF of all the screens of the latest version (v.2.0) of the
application https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/images/8/8b/Webhob.2.0.pdf,
a link
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:49 AM, David Nyström david.nyst...@enea.com wrote:
So that about a disto refusing this and possibly other BSP layers ?
Should the disto.conf select of nativesdk be made machine specific on all
machines in meta-fsl-ppc ? And one added target after a meta-fsl-ppc rebase
Nice update! I particularly like the availability of the sources and source
manifest.
Not sure how we will be able to do the “test” feature on page 28 across the web.
Dave
From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On
Behalf Of Jim Kosem
Sent: Friday, July
From: Paul Eggleton [mailto:paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 4:23 AM
To: Stewart, David C
On Thursday 05 July 2012 23:00:17 Stewart, David C wrote:
Guys - I'm really struggling with this overall concept of concurrency.
It implies that if Paul and I are
On Friday 06 July 2012 17:13:45 Stewart, David C wrote:
From: Paul Eggleton [mailto:paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 4:23 AM
To: Stewart, David C
On Thursday 05 July 2012 23:00:17 Stewart, David C wrote:
Guys - I'm really struggling with this overall concept
On 07/06/2012 10:59 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:47 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On 07/06/2012 10:44 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:20 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
Something has changes very recently. I was building with a fresh clone
of poky and meta-intel.
On 07/06/2012 10:59 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:47 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On 07/06/2012 10:44 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:20 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
Something has changes very recently. I was building with a fresh clone
of poky and meta-intel.
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 14:30 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On 07/06/2012 10:59 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:47 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On 07/06/2012 10:44 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:20 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
Something has changes very recently. I
On 07/06/2012 02:35 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 13:36 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On 07/06/2012 10:59 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:47 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On 07/06/2012 10:44 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:20 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 14:48 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On 07/06/2012 02:35 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 13:36 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On 07/06/2012 10:59 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:47 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On 07/06/2012 10:44 AM, Tom Zanussi
I was looking at the Yocto Development Manual (Latest), section
4.6.2. Creating Config Fragments. I was confused about the file
statement and the naming of the directory to locate the fragment file
until I found a similar discussion in the BSP Guide (lastest) section
1.2.10. Linux Kernel
On 07/06/2012 02:57 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 14:48 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On 07/06/2012 02:35 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 13:36 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On 07/06/2012 10:59 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:47 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On 07/06/2012 02:57 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 14:48 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On 07/06/2012 02:35 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 13:36 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On 07/06/2012 10:59 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 10:47 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 15:48 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On 07/06/2012 02:57 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 14:48 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On 07/06/2012 02:35 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 13:36 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On 07/06/2012 10:59 AM, Tom Zanussi
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 15:48 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On 07/06/2012 02:57 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 14:48 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On 07/06/2012 02:35 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri,
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 16:13 -0400, James Abernathy wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com
wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 15:48 -0400, jfabernathy wrote:
On 07/06/2012 02:57 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 14:48 -0400,
Fix segmentation fault when passing -a without angel value.
When psplash -a is called instead of psplash -aangle value
it will segmentation fault calling out of bound argv[].
git://git.yoctoproject.org/psplash
Signed-of-by: Aws Ismailaws.ism...@windriver.com
s/angel/angle :)
Aws\
On 07/06/2012 04:53 PM, Aws Ismail wrote:
Fix segmentation fault when passing -a without angel value.
When psplash -a is called instead of psplash -aangle value
it will segmentation fault calling out of bound argv[].
git://git.yoctoproject.org/psplash
Signed-of-by: Aws
Jim,
I am looking at that section in the BSP Guide and it is actually out of date
regarding the 1.2.10 section. In the section it lists the
linux-yocto_3.0.bbappend file (which is probably lagging as it should be 3.2).
Anyway, the listing uses KERNEL_FEATURES and I believe that KBRANCH is
Cool!
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 6, 2012, at 5:06 PM, Rifenbark, Scott M scott.m.rifenb...@intel.com
wrote:
Jim,
I am looking at that section in the BSP Guide and it is actually out of date
regarding the 1.2.10 section. In the section it lists the
linux-yocto_3.0.bbappend file (which
Yes this was my suggestion, since you might not want to change the nativesdk
kernel headers for all machines in all BSP layers, if the distro is using
multiple BSP layers, which it probably should be able to do.
Setting this with machine overrides in distro.conf is possible but quite
messy
On Jul 6, 2012 5:35 PM, David Nyström
david.nyst...@enea.commailto:david.nyst...@enea.com wrote:
Yes this was my suggestion, since you might not want to change the nativesdk
kernel headers for all machines in all BSP layers, if the distro is using
multiple BSP layers, which it probably
33 matches
Mail list logo
