[yocto] [Package Report System]Manual check recipes name list

2012-10-20 Thread Yocto Project Package Report System
This mail was sent out by Package Report System. It will list all the recipes which can't check upstream version by script, and will show how long it is since their last mannual version check. You can check the detail information at http://packages.yoctoproject.org/manuallychkinfo PackageName

[yocto] [Package Report System]Upgrade recipes name list

2012-10-20 Thread Yocto Project Package Report System
This mail was sent out by Package Report System. This message list those recipes which need to be upgraded. If maintainers believe some of them needn't to upgrade this time, they can fill in RECIPE_NO_UPDATE_REASON_pn-"xxx" in upstream_tracking files to ignore this recipe remainder until newer u

[yocto] Cedartrail / GLES / Framebuffer

2012-10-20 Thread Chris Tapp
I'm still trying to get my 'perfect' platform configuration for a project. 1) I need to use the 'nopvr' machine as I need unionfs. This means I need the kernel 3.2, which doesn't currently support pvr; 2) I'm running using the framebuffer and would rather not have to include libx11; 3) I was usi

Re: [yocto] why was meta-dlna submodule history stripped out?

2012-10-20 Thread Ross Burton
On Saturday, 20 October 2012 at 13:16, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Long term however I'd rather see the additional unique recipes in meta- > guacamayo itself go into more official OE community layers. meta-dlna would > continue to take them from there using combo-layer though I suspect. (This is > the p

Re: [yocto] why was meta-dlna submodule history stripped out?

2012-10-20 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Friday 19 October 2012 11:01:09 Saul Wold wrote: > On 10/19/2012 07:33 AM, Tomas Frydrych wrote: > > (I am delighted Intel is finding Guacamayo useful, but the obliteration > > of the history makes it look as if the credit for this official Yocto > > layer goes to Intel; I am sure that was not i