Hi ,
We have a linux release base on yocto, and we want to use yocto-kernel-tools to
manage kernel configuration fragments, instead of the old method. So we want to
know, when poky will use yocto-kernel-tools to manage the kernel ? Is there a
plan?
Thanks!
Rick
at the moment, the only mention of that task is in the reference
manual. does it deserve additional coverage, perhaps in the ADT
manual? just asking.
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa,
On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 15:37 +0800, Biao wrote:
Hi all,
I can not launch hob on my ubun-10.04, it seems saying no PyGobject whereas
python-object has already been installed. Can anyone kindly give a help?
$ hob
FATAL: Gtk+, PyGtk and PyGobject are required to use Hob,
You have Gtk+
here: https://www.yoctoproject.org/tools-resources/projects, the
para on the Build Appliance is mentioned twice.
rday
--
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Robert P. J. Day
rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
poking around kern-tools for purpose of documenting some
On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 14:23 +0200, Mihai Lindner wrote:
On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 15:37 +0800, Biao wrote:
Hi all,
I can not launch hob on my ubun-10.04, it seems saying no PyGobject
whereas python-object has already been installed. Can anyone kindly give a
help?
Oh, forgot to
got errors during bitbake core-image-minimal on yacto 1.3 + jasperforest
BSP
how can I just clean everything then re-build all?
since I don't modify any kernel code before make the build, will this
error caused by build environment settings problem?
message from
i'm still a bit unclear on the differences(?) between what is listed
as required packages for the host development system in the
reference manual, and what's listed as ASSUME_PROVIDED in the oe-core
bitbake.conf file.
should those two lists not match? for instance, the ref manual
states
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 6:28 AM, Rick Yang rick.y...@enea.com wrote:
Hi ,
We have a linux release base on yocto, and we want to use
yocto-kernel-tools to manage kernel configuration fragments, instead of the
old method. So we want to know, when poky will use yocto-kernel-tools to
i just noticed, in the poky-extras layer,
kern-tools-native_git.bbappend, which describes itself as for local
kern-tools work.
is there a use case for this? oe-core already supplies
kern-tools-native, and that bbappend appears to simply let the
developer work with the head of kern-tools
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.cawrote:
i just noticed, in the poky-extras layer,
kern-tools-native_git.bbappend, which describes itself as for local
kern-tools work.
is there a use case for this? oe-core already supplies
kern-tools-native, and
Hi,
I'm a yocto mostly-newbie, trying to find my way. I have a custom layer
that I am using to build a kernel. The layer right now consists of a few
kernel patches and a defconfig and is based on the standard kernel
otherwise.
When I do a diff on my defconfig and the bitbake generated
At 2012-12-24 20:37:26,Mihai Lindner mihaix.lind...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 14:23 +0200, Mihai Lindner wrote:
On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 15:37 +0800, Biao wrote:
Hi all,
I can not launch hob on my ubun-10.04, it seems saying no PyGobject
whereas python-object has
13 matches
Mail list logo