On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:04:20PM +, Saridakis, Dean (US SSA) wrote:
> Seems like this ought to be pretty easy based on the docs - Not sure what
> I've got wrong. I've added an append to my layer w/
>
> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}:"
>
> SRC_URI += "0001-yada-yada.patch"
>
Seems like this ought to be pretty easy based on the docs - Not sure what I've
got wrong. I've added an append to my layer w/
FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}:"
SRC_URI += "0001-yada-yada.patch"
# Comment out while debugging
#PRINC := "${@int(PRINC) + 1}"
The append file is in BBFI
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:37 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> from section 1.1 of BSP developers guide:
>
> http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/bsp-guide/bsp-guide.html#bsp-layers
>
> first, it's not actually *required* that a layer name start with the
> prefix "meta-", is it? pretty sure it'
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:19 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> (aside: currently going through yocto BSP developer's guide with my
> proofreader's beanie on so be prepared for a few BSP-related questions
> today. you've been warned.)
>
> in section on BSP requirements:
>
> http://www.yoctoproject
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> first, it's not actually *required* that a layer name start with the
> prefix "meta-", is it? pretty sure it's not and, if it isn't, that
> should be made abundantly clear. it's fine to point out that it's a
> well-established convention
On 04/19/2013 07:45 AM, Paul Barker wrote:
On 19 April 2013 15:39, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
i think i'll just leave this to the rpi folks. :-)
I'm building for raspberrypi so I'll add this to my queue of things to look at.
Just another note about the netbase, for 1.4 the interfaces file
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 April 2013 11:39:09 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> p.s. i think one of the manuals should mention chris larson's
>> "bitbake-env" utility, which i use for debugging and explanations all
>> the time.
>
> I'd rather wait until we
Thanks Paul,
I followed these instructions
https://github.com/gumstix/Gumstix-YoctoProject-Repo
The recipe was in
~/yocto/poky/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-extended/net-snmp/
net-snmp_5.7.1.bb
I'm using
BB version 1.15.1
Distro Poky 1.2.1
Cheers
2013/4/19 Paul Eggleton
> On Friday 19 Ap
On Friday 19 April 2013 15:44:39 Katu Txakur wrote:
> I want to include net-snmp in an image that I'm building with the Yocto
> project (gumstix-console-image). When I add it net-snmp-client or server to
> the local.conf I get this error when bitbake is creating the rootfs.
>
> Processing perl-mod
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 08:52 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
> CAUTION!! giant security hole awaits!
>
> I've just discovered that recent Poky/Yocto runs 'devshell' as ROOT!
>
> If I run 'bitbake SOME-RECIPE -c devshell' with a somewhat older
> metadata (poky rev 09359e6ec00901abfe49157f1f9730117b4d284b
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> On 19/04/13 15:34, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> >
> >> On 19/04/13 15:15, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >>> i'd wonder, if you're building for a different machine, why are
> >>> you including the meta-rpi layer?
>
On 19/04/13 15:34, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
>
>> On 19/04/13 15:15, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>> i'd wonder, if you're building for a different machine, why are
>>> you including the meta-rpi layer?
>>
>> Because at a distro-level you often want to target
CAUTION!! giant security hole awaits!
I've just discovered that recent Poky/Yocto runs 'devshell' as ROOT!
If I run 'bitbake SOME-RECIPE -c devshell' with a somewhat older
metadata (poky rev 09359e6ec00901abfe49157f1f9730117b4d284b)
the shell is run using my user id.
With a newer poky rev 90b98
On 19 April 2013 15:39, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> i think i'll just leave this to the rpi folks. :-)
>
I'm building for raspberrypi so I'll add this to my queue of things to look at.
--
Paul Barker
Email: p...@paulbarker.me.uk
http://www.paulbarker.me.uk
Hi,
I want to include net-snmp in an image that I'm building with the Yocto
project (gumstix-console-image). When I add it net-snmp-client or server to
the local.conf I get this error when bitbake is creating the rootfs.
Processing perl-module-text-soundex...
error: Failed dependencies:
net-snm
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:17:10AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Martin Jansa wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:35:18AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The actual files subdirectory name is "netbase-5.0",
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> On 19/04/13 15:15, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > i'd wonder, if you're building for a different machine, why are
> > you including the meta-rpi layer?
>
> Because at a distro-level you often want to target different
> architectures.
yes, i appreciate t
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:23:01AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
>
> > On 19/04/13 15:02, Burton, Ross wrote:
> > > On 19 April 2013 14:49, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > >> but in the case of the rpi, is there any value in putting the
> > >> files und
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:17:10AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Martin Jansa wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:35:18AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > >
> > > The actual files subdirectory name is "netbase-5.0", not "netbase".
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Robert P.
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> On 19/04/13 15:02, Burton, Ross wrote:
> > On 19 April 2013 14:49, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >> but in the case of the rpi, is there any value in putting the
> >> files under a machine-named subdirectory? of course it won't
> >> hurt, but is there an
On 19/04/13 15:15, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> i'd wonder, if you're building for a different machine, why are
> you including the meta-rpi layer?
Because at a distro-level you often want to target different architectures.
> best answer i'd be able to give is that it's not essential but it
> won't
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:35:18AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > The actual files subdirectory name is "netbase-5.0", not "netbase".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day
> >
> > ---
> >
> > same fix was once applied to exactly the same reci
On 19/04/13 15:02, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 19 April 2013 14:49, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> but in the case of the rpi, is there any value in putting the files
>> under a machine-named subdirectory? of course it won't hurt, but is
>> there any point to it?
>
> You could argue the clarity that i
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 19 April 2013 14:49, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > but in the case of the rpi, is there any value in putting the
> > files under a machine-named subdirectory? of course it won't hurt,
> > but is there any point to it?
>
> You could argue the clarity t
On 19 April 2013 14:49, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> but in the case of the rpi, is there any value in putting the files
> under a machine-named subdirectory? of course it won't hurt, but is
> there any point to it?
You could argue the clarity that it will bring if another machine is
added to the
On Fri, 19 Apr 2013, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:35:18AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > The actual files subdirectory name is "netbase-5.0", not "netbase".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day
> >
> > ---
> >
> > same fix was once applied to exactly the same reci
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:49:56AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> using the example i patched earlier, here's the file hierarchy for
> raspberry pi's netbase recipe:
>
> ./netbase_5.0.bbappend
> ./netbase-5.0
> ./netbase-5.0/raspberrypi
> ./netbase-5.0/raspberrypi/interfaces
> ./netbase-5.0
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 09:35:18AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> The actual files subdirectory name is "netbase-5.0", not "netbase".
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day
>
> ---
>
> same fix was once applied to exactly the same recipe bbappend file
> under meta-ti layer.
>
> diff --git
using the example i patched earlier, here's the file hierarchy for
raspberry pi's netbase recipe:
./netbase_5.0.bbappend
./netbase-5.0
./netbase-5.0/raspberrypi
./netbase-5.0/raspberrypi/interfaces
./netbase-5.0/raspberrypi/hosts
i understand the notion of a machine-specific subdirectory for
The actual files subdirectory name is "netbase-5.0", not "netbase".
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day
---
same fix was once applied to exactly the same recipe bbappend file
under meta-ti layer.
diff --git a/recipes-core/netbase/netbase_5.0.bbappend
b/recipes-core/netbase/netbase_5.0.bbappend
from section 1.1 of BSP developers guide:
http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/bsp-guide/bsp-guide.html#bsp-layers
first, it's not actually *required* that a layer name start with the
prefix "meta-", is it? pretty sure it's not and, if it isn't, that
should be made abundantly clear. it's f
(aside: currently going through yocto BSP developer's guide with my
proofreader's beanie on so be prepared for a few BSP-related questions
today. you've been warned.)
in section on BSP requirements:
http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/bsp-guide/bsp-guide.html#released-bsp-requirements
t
On Friday 19 April 2013 11:44:49 Elvis Dowson wrote:
>In my zynq-7-default-versions.inc file, I have the following
> definitions for preferred versions
>
> PREFERRED_VERSION_virtual/kernel ?= "3.6"
> PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-libc-headers = "3.6"
> PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot = "2012.10"
>
> H
Hi,
In my zynq-7-default-versions.inc file, I have the following definitions
for preferred versions
PREFERRED_VERSION_virtual/kernel ?= "3.6"
PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-libc-headers = "3.6"
PREFERRED_VERSION_u-boot = "2012.10"
However, when I build core-image-minimal, PREFERRED_VERSION_linux
34 matches
Mail list logo
