[yocto] Yocto .gitignore

2013-11-29 Thread Søren Holm
Hi Why does yocto .gitignpre include meta-*/. Why would we possibly want to ignore custom layers ? -- Søren Holm ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Automated testing on real hardware

2013-11-29 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hi Nicolas, On Friday 29 November 2013 17:31:40 Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Paul Eggleton < > paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > * It requires root to run, since it mounts the images temporarily and > > modifies the contents. We've done quite a lot to avoid ha

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Automated testing on real hardware

2013-11-29 Thread Nicolas Dechesne
Paul, On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Paul Eggleton < paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > LAVA > - > > A number of people had suggested I look at LAVA [1]. It is split into > different > components for each function, some of which should be usable independently > so > you don't have to

[yocto] Automated testing on real hardware

2013-11-29 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hi folks, (warning - long email ahead) As I've talked about recently, one of the things I'm looking into at the moment is how to do automated QA for Yocto Project releases on real hardware. The Yocto Project QA team does tests on the supported reference platforms for each architecture for ever

[yocto] [RFC] Yocto 1.6 Overall Testing Plan

2013-11-29 Thread Georgescu, Alexandru C
Hello, Here is the RFC version of the Yocto 1.6 Overall Testing Plan: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_1.6_Overall_Test_Plan. It will be presented on the next Technical Team meeting to the community. Please take some time for review! Regards, -- Alexandru Georgescu Yocto QA Engineer SSG

Re: [yocto] Documentation on WORKDIR

2013-11-29 Thread Martin Jansa
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 09:02:47AM +, Guenzel, Robert wrote: > Hello, > > I am currently starting to work with Yocto and I am having a bit of a hard > time to figure out how the two documented versions of WORKDIR come into > existence. > > The doc states: > """ > For packages that are not d

Re: [yocto] unbootable image produced with PACKAGE_CLASSES ?= "package_ipk", /etc missing

2013-11-29 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hi Robert, On Friday 29 November 2013 15:28:28 Robert Yang wrote: > I can reproduce the similar problem now, I think that it should be a > bug of e2fsprogs, it seems the debugfs can't know the free space > correctly, and thus it appears no free blocks, I'm sorry to say that > I can't fix it in a s

[yocto] Documentation on WORKDIR

2013-11-29 Thread Guenzel, Robert
Hello, I am currently starting to work with Yocto and I am having a bit of a hard time to figure out how the two documented versions of WORKDIR come into existence. The doc states: """ For packages that are not dependent on a particular machine, WORKDIR is defined as follows: ${TMPDIR}/work/