On 11 February 2015 at 21:39, Joe MacDonald joe_macdon...@mentor.com
wrote:
What's more likely happening I suspect is that you are on a newer
branch/revision of OE-Core/Poky than the meta-selinux maintainers have
tested.
I can't speak to the maintenance schedule for meta-selinux but maybe
On 11/02/2015 18:35, Bob Cochran yo...@mindchasers.com wrote:
On 01/05/2015 06:59 AM, Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
On 28/12/2014 00:18, William Mills wmi...@ti.com wrote:
On 12/27/2014 10:40 AM, Mills, William wrote:
OK, you are not going to believe me but I swear this really happened
...
The Error Reporting Service was rewritten and the URLs are different.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com
---
.../buildbot/status/web/templates/grid_macros.html |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
Yesterday, I built a large image using Poky/Yocto 870323cac1e
Today I updated my Poky repo to 231d4a9d3
When I rebuilt the same image, bitbake kicked off more than
5200 tasks, building virtually every package from scratch.
How can I tell why this happened? I don't have buildhistory
enabled,
On 2015-02-12 14:33, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 12 February 2015 at 21:25, Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com
mailto:g...@mlbassoc.com wrote:
Yesterday, I built a large image using Poky/Yocto 870323cac1e
Today I updated my Poky repo to 231d4a9d3
When I rebuilt the same image, bitbake
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 02:25:32PM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
Yesterday, I built a large image using Poky/Yocto 870323cac1e
Today I updated my Poky repo to 231d4a9d3
When I rebuilt the same image, bitbake kicked off more than
5200 tasks, building virtually every package from scratch.
How
On 12 February 2015 at 21:25, Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com wrote:
Yesterday, I built a large image using Poky/Yocto 870323cac1e
Today I updated my Poky repo to 231d4a9d3
When I rebuilt the same image, bitbake kicked off more than
5200 tasks, building virtually every package from scratch.
On 02/12/2015 05:05 PM, Stephen Flowers wrote:
So I ran cyclictest with an idle system and loaded with multiple
instances of cat /dev/zero /dev/null
When I suggested filesystem activity I was suggesting getting a kernel
filesystem and a physical I/O device to be active.
The load above is
On 2015-02-12 7:20 PM, William Mills wrote:
On 02/12/2015 05:05 PM, Stephen Flowers wrote:
So I ran cyclictest with an idle system and loaded with multiple
instances of cat /dev/zero /dev/null
When I suggested filesystem activity I was suggesting getting a kernel
filesystem and a
So I ran cyclictest with an idle system and loaded with multiple
instances of cat /dev/zero /dev/null
#cyclictest -a 0 -p 99 -m -n -l 10 -q
I ran this command as shown by Toyoka at the 2014 Linuxcon Japan
[[meta-selinux][PATCH] Add explicit dependency on layers with recipes we
bbappend.] On 15.02.12 (Thu 04:39) Philip Tricca wrote:
This is a stop-gap to get meaningful error messages to folks till we get
per-layer bbappends implemented.
Signed-off-by: Philip Tricca fl...@twobit.us
Merged.
I thought I'd better follow this up with a semi-separate thread for
anyone who is using meta-selinux and isn't really interested in the
direct follow-ups when I just indicate a patch has been merged.
This went into master and it captures, I think, the implicit
dependencies in the layer right now.
Hi Ross,
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 11 February 2015 at 21:39, Joe MacDonald joe_macdon...@mentor.com
wrote:
What's more likely happening I suspect is that you are on a newer
branch/revision of OE-Core/Poky than the meta-selinux
On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 16:29 +, Paul Eggleton wrote:
(Adding yocto@yoctoproject.org to CC since that is where meta-selinux patches
tend to go at least)
On Wednesday 11 February 2015 10:53:03 dpquigl wrote:
I'm working on OpenXT and it makes use of the meta-selinux repo hosted
by the
14 matches
Mail list logo
