Re: [yocto] Per image customizations

On Mon, 06 Jun 2016 15:27:17 Diego wrote: > Hi Oleksandr, > > In data venerdì 3 giugno 2016 20:56:32, Oleksandr Poznyak ha scritto: > > I found that that’s an issue with rpm packages. I didn't expect there > > might > > be some issue with rpm. If you really don't care which package management > >

[linux-yocto] [PULL] kernel-cache; yocto-4.6: stage latest -rt content

This pull achieves several things for the 4.6.x yocto kernel, listed in dependency order, with #3 being the most relevant to folks: 1) ensure kernel cache, when fed into yocto-kernel-tools, generates output that is source identical to existing base branches of

Re: [yocto] x86-64 with -mx32 option?

Yes, x32 is built and tested on the autobuilder daily. Ross On 26 June 2016 at 01:39, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > Has anyone successfully used Yocto to build a Linux system for a 64-bit > Intel processor using the -mx32 compiler option, forcing all long and > pointer types

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] suricata: package update to 3.1.0

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- recipes-security/suricata/suricata.inc | 6 +-- recipes-security/suricata/suricata_3.0.2.bb | 58 - recipes-security/suricata/suricata_3.1.bb | 58 + 3 files changed, 61

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] suricata: update to 3.0.2

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- recipes-security/suricata/libhtp_0.5.19.bb | 15 recipes-security/suricata/libhtp_0.5.20.bb | 15 recipes-security/suricata/suricata.inc | 6 +-- recipes-security/suricata/suricata_3.0.1.bb | 58

[yocto] a couple notes/questions on UBOOT_CONFIG

fresh off perusing the variable glossary for this variable: http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#var-UBOOT_CONFIG and the uboot-config.bbclass file, some observations. first, the variable glossary *strongly* suggests that the default value is a single value