[yocto] config file

Hi, I have downloaded the poky repo and it is clean. I do not find any .config file in poky directory. Please, point me to the location under poky tree to copy the .config file from the external source so that bitbake can use .config file configuration. -- *Thanks & Regards,B.Nousilal,* --

Re: [yocto] Help with DISTRO settings

> On Jul 25, 2016, at 10:00 PM, Paul Eggleton > wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 20:34:32 Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Jul 25, 2016, at 8:31 PM, Edward Wingate wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 1:27 AM, Nicolas Dechesne >>> >>>

[linux-yocto] [PATCH] usb: mux: add module parameter to portmux-intel-drcfg

From: Wan Ahmad Zainie This patch add the following module parameter, usb0_init_state to override default USB port 0 role set by ABL/BIOS, and usb0_auto_role to set USB port 0 mux in automatic mode. By default, this driver will set the initial mode based

[linux-yocto] [PATCH] Add module parameter to portmux-intel-drcfg driver

From: Wan Ahmad Zainie Hi Bruce. This is a resend. I mistakenly put a wrong from email address in my previous email. This patch is to add two module parameters to portmux-intel-drcfg driver, to enable configuring USB port 0 of Apollo Lake during boot

Re: [yocto] Help with DISTRO settings

On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 20:34:32 Khem Raj wrote: > > On Jul 25, 2016, at 8:31 PM, Edward Wingate wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 1:27 AM, Nicolas Dechesne > > > > wrote: > >> hmm. you shouldn't set DISTRO in conf/layer.conf, that doesn't

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] Fix yocto build with missing configfs header

On 2016-07-25 4:11 PM, Sebastien Boeuf wrote: California Sullivan pointed to me that the patch from Octavian Purdila I had asked to include in yocto 4.4 was not compiling properly. merged. Bruce The patch is tracked with following SHA1: 03607ace807b414eab46323c794b6fb8fcc2d48c The issue

Re: [linux-yocto] [PULL REQUEST] mei storage proxy device for bxt

On 2016-07-25 5:31 PM, Winkler, Tomas wrote: Hi Bruce Here are the patches for mei storage proxy device (SPD) for bxt-rebase. SPD allows BXT MEI device to store its data on RPMB partition and also EFI to store the EFI variables. This is currently purely BXT feature and not yet appeared in

Re: [yocto] Help with DISTRO settings

> On Jul 25, 2016, at 8:31 PM, Edward Wingate wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 1:27 AM, Nicolas Dechesne > wrote: >> hmm. you shouldn't set DISTRO in conf/layer.conf, that doesn't sound >> right. DISTRO needs to be set in local.conf (or any

Re: [yocto] Help with DISTRO settings

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 1:27 AM, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > hmm. you shouldn't set DISTRO in conf/layer.conf, that doesn't sound > right. DISTRO needs to be set in local.conf (or any of the other build > specific conf files). I agree, I don't know why I had it in

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH v6 3/4] linux-raspberrypi-base.bbclass: support for .dtbo files for dtb overlays

Hi François, Actually, I tried to use a -overlay.dtb as a device tree overlay with the 4.4.9, and it didn't load it... If you don't use the tools dedicated to debug device trees (like vcdbg), there is no error message nor complaint, but the device tree is not loaded. Only when I used vcdbg did

[yocto] [meta-qt4] core-image-lsb-qt4 & packageroup-core-qt4-libs

bitbake core-image-lsb-qt4 ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'packagegroup-core-qt4-libs' (but /home/shazbot/poky/meta-qt4/recipes-qt4/images/core-image-lsb-qt4.bb RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it) I see the packagegroup in meta-qt3, but not meta-qt4. Intentional? Cheers. --Tim --

Re: [yocto] Error during adding a new recipe.

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 6:52 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Jul 21, 2016, at 6:45 PM, Paul Eggleton

[linux-yocto] [PULL REQUEST] mei storage proxy device for bxt

Hi Bruce Here are the patches for mei storage proxy device (SPD) for bxt-rebase. SPD allows BXT MEI device to store its data on RPMB partition and also EFI to store the EFI variables. This is currently purely BXT feature and not yet appeared in upstream, except the EFI interruptible patches,

[linux-yocto] [PATCH 1/1] 4.1.28 Fix bad backport of 8f182270dfec "mm/swap.c: flush lru, pvecs on compound page arrival"

From 74225a4cbea38034034add5da67a2f7ee23251c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steven Rostedt When I pulled in 4.1.28 into my stable 4.1-rt tree and ran the tests, it crashed with a severe OOM killing everything. I then tested 4.1.28 without -rt and it had the same issue. I

[linux-yocto] [PATCH] configfs: implement binary attributes

From: Pantelis Antoniou ConfigFS lacked binary attributes up until now. This patch introduces support for binary attributes in a somewhat similar manner of sysfs binary attributes albeit with changes that fit the configfs usage model. Problems that configfs

[linux-yocto] [PATCH] Fix yocto build with missing configfs header

California Sullivan pointed to me that the patch from Octavian Purdila I had asked to include in yocto 4.4 was not compiling properly. The patch is tracked with following SHA1: 03607ace807b414eab46323c794b6fb8fcc2d48c The issue was that we were missing an underlying patch on which the previous

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] Backport iSMT patch from mainline kernel to linux-yocto-4.1

On 2016-07-25 01:30 AM, raymond@intel.com wrote: From: Raymond Tan Hi Bruce, This is the patch to backport Intel Denverton patches on iSMT that are available in mainline Linux Kernel. Please review and provide feedback, if any. Looks fine to me. this is now

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH v6 3/4] linux-raspberrypi-base.bbclass: support for .dtbo files for dtb overlays

Hi Hervé, Thank you for giving us up and running .dtbo overlays functionality through this patch, it is running fine for me. Nevertheless, I have a concern about the processing applied to overlay filenames. According to this post https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php ?f=107=139732,

Re: [yocto] changing ownership of a file in a package

On 2016-07-25 16:07, piotr.lewicki wrote: Thank you. I will try this, but I wonder what is the right way of dealing with that when I want to change the ownership of let's say 2 files from different packages to a user that I create? Is using "useradd" possible in 2 separate recipes (to create

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH v5 3/4] linux-raspberrypi-base.bbclass: support for .dtbo files for dtb overlays

Hi Hervé, Thanks for the explanation, I actually missed the 2nd pass aspect of the process. Your patch is running ok for me (4.1.21 and 4.4.13) after having found and applied the required linux-dtb.inc patch you prepared (for the record, it is named "[PATCH v3] Support for .dtbo files for dtb

Re: [yocto] changing ownership of a file in a package

Thank you. I will try this, but I wonder what is the right way of dealing with that when I want to change the ownership of let's say 2 files from different packages to a user that I create? Is using "useradd" possible in 2 separate recipes (to create the same user)? Thanks, Piotr On

Re: [yocto] [yocto-autobuilder][PATCH 0/2] Allow OPTIMIZED_GIT_CLONE to be False

Merged into master -b On Sat, 2016-07-23 at 08:11 -0700, Bill Randle wrote: > The autobuilder code assumes OPTIMIZED_GIT_CLONE is always set True, > because things break if it is set to False. I had a case where it > needed to be set False because the git trash folder was on a > different > file

Re: [yocto] changing ownership of a file in a package

As a workaround, have you tried using the other class to include users (useradd)? Look at the 'note' of this section http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.1/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#ref-classes-extrausers Leo El 07/25/2016 a las 07:22 AM, piotr.lewicki escribió: Hi, I have a package where I

Re: [yocto] [yocto-autobuilder][PATCH 0/2] Allow OPTIMIZED_GIT_CLONE to be False

On Sat, 2016-07-23 at 08:11 -0700, Bill Randle wrote: > The autobuilder code assumes OPTIMIZED_GIT_CLONE is always set True, > because things break if it is set to False. I had a case where it > needed to be set False because the git trash folder was on a > different > file system than the build

Re: [yocto] [yocto-autobuilder][PATCH] nightly-wic.conf: build genericx86 wic images

Merged into master -b On Fri, 2016-07-22 at 10:35 -0700, Bill Randle wrote: > QA requested wic images for genericx86, as well as x86-64 so include > config and build for them. > > [YOCTO #10006] > > Signed-off-by: Bill Randle > --- >  

Re: [yocto] Kernel bug 109051

On 2016-07-25 2:47 AM, Chris Tapp wrote: Hi Bruce, On 25 Jul 2016, at 03:40, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2016-07-24 6:09 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: I’m using the meta-intel “valley-island” BSP under “krogoth” and think I may have run into

[yocto] changing ownership of a file in a package

Hi, I have a package where I want to install some files into a home directory of a user "testuser". I create a user in my image bb file using "extrausers". My problem is that I'm unable to change ownership of those files from root to the testuser. Simple "chown testuser:testuser -R

Re: [yocto] Help with DISTRO settings

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Edward Wingate wrote: >> Just conf/distro/mydistro.conf is needed. > > Well, it didn't work if it is only in conf/distro/mydistro.conf. I > had to have it in conf/layer.conf as well. hmm. you shouldn't set DISTRO in conf/layer.conf, that

Re: [yocto] Kernel bug 109051

Hi Bruce, > On 25 Jul 2016, at 03:40, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On 2016-07-24 6:09 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: >> I’m using the meta-intel “valley-island” BSP under “krogoth” and think I may >> have run into https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109051. >> >> I’m