Re: [linux-yocto] [ PULL ] Revert Sound Patch for BXT

On 2016-07-28 8:28 PM, Russ Weight wrote: This pull-request reverts one of the audio patches recently submitted for the standard/intel/bxt-rebase branch. The patch in question is a fix-up patch for another patch that is not yet included. The result is that a non-existent structure member is

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] linux-raspberrypi versions

> On Jul 22, 2016, at 6:16 AM, Martin Bergek wrote: > > Paul, > > I am having stability issues with the USB subsystem on Raspberry Pi 3 under > 4.4 that I can’t reproduce under 4.1. I assume 4.1 will still remain in the > recipe when 4.4 is made the default option. How

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH v6 0/4] Support for .dtbo files for dtb overlays, required by kernels 4.4.6+

> On Jul 20, 2016, at 3:00 PM, Herve Jourdain wrote: > > v6: rebased > > v5: modifications after more review > * Added an Upstream-Status to the kernel patch > * Only one instance of KERNEL_DEVICETREE defined (with the new .dtbo syntax) > * Modification of the

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH v4 00/12] Support for VC4 graphics driver

> On Jul 22, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez > wrote: > > On 21/07/16 14:32, Herve Jourdain wrote: >> v4 series: >> a. rebased >> b. Upstream-Status added to the patch to the VC4 driver (needed only for >> kernel 4.4, accepted upstream in 4.7) >> >> v3 series:

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH v4 00/12] Support for VC4 graphics driver

> On Jul 21, 2016, at 5:32 AM, Herve Jourdain wrote: > > v4 series: > a. rebased > b. Upstream-Status added to the patch to the VC4 driver (needed only for > kernel 4.4, accepted upstream in 4.7) > > v3 series: > a. patch rebased > b. new revision of kernel, to get a

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 1/1] Patch for implementing GstGlMemoryEGL for gstreamer 1.8.2

Please post this patch against OE-Core > On Jul 20, 2016, at 11:10 AM, Herve Jourdain wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Herve Jourdain > --- > .../0001-gl-implement-GstGlMemoryEGL.patch | 494 + >

[linux-yocto] [ PULL ] Revert Sound Patch for BXT

This pull-request reverts one of the audio patches recently submitted for the standard/intel/bxt-rebase branch. The patch in question is a fix-up patch for another patch that is not yet included. The result is that a non-existent structure member is referenced, causing a compilation error

[yocto] populate_sdk mutlilib and sysroots

On krogoth branch of poky trying to create a multilib sdk (aarch64 aarch64_ilp32) Using the below local.conf CONF_VERSION = "1" MACHINE = "TestMachine" CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL_append += " openssl" PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-thunderx-81xx = "4.4.3" BB_NUMBER_THREADS="32"

Re: [yocto] Compilation error while adding perf tool to the rootfs

Hello Ross, I am using my own kernel [3.18] + oe-core's perf recipe to build the perf utility. Thanks. Cheers Vijay On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:17 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On 27 July 2016 at 22:53, Vijayakumar Badiger > wrote: > >> We have a

[yocto] QA Report Yocto Project 2.2 M2 rc1

Here is the final QA Report for Yocto Project 2.2 M2 rc1 https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/WW30_-_2016-07-21_-_Full_Test_Cycle_2.2_M2.rc1 Summary There are a total of 40 bugs reported in this test cycle, 19 new and 21 that were raised in previous Milestones/Releases and appeared also in M2.

[linux-yocto] How to remove a module from core-image-base

Hello, I don’t know if it’s ok to send this email. I just meet a simple problem, and I try every method but i still can’t solve it. I download yocto from http://freescale.github.io/ , and build core-image-base. MACHINE=imx6ulevk source setup-environment imx6ul

[yocto] [meta][PATCH] python-native: Compute prefix based on staging area

python-native should not assume that prefix points to the native sysroot, and instead use STAGING_LIBDIR to determine prefix, since python-native may be used to compile non-native python modules for the target sysroot. Computing an incorrect prefix causes unintended build behavior, especially on

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] meta: iio.cfg: Enable more IIO sensors

On 2016-07-28 12:49 AM, Yong Li wrote: Dear Maintainers, This patch file enables more popular iio sensor drivers as kernel modules, users can test these external i2c sensors more easily. Since they are modules and not built-in, it looks fine to me Please merge it into yocto-4.4 branch if

Re: [yocto] [linux-yocto] The kernel versions used by Yocto

On 2016-07-28 12:00 AM, Zhenhua Luo wrote: Hi, I want to understand the kernel version selection criteria of Yocto release, can somebody please help to comment on it? I recall that Yocto uses the LTSI kernel, may I know if this is still the case? I was about to describe the process .. but

Re: [linux-yocto] The kernel versions used by Yocto

On 2016-07-28 12:00 AM, Zhenhua Luo wrote: Hi, I want to understand the kernel version selection criteria of Yocto release, can somebody please help to comment on it? I recall that Yocto uses the LTSI kernel, may I know if this is still the case? I was about to describe the process .. but

Re: [yocto] Compilation error while adding perf tool to the rootfs

On 27 July 2016 at 22:53, Vijayakumar Badiger wrote: > We have a requirement here to set up the perf tool through our Yocto frame > work. > As Perf source comes with linux kernel under tools/perf ,so I added this > perf tool to be installed > as part of my rootfs image.

Re: [yocto] Can't replace login.defs with shadow-sysroot bbappend

Hi Oliver, The following line in shadow-sysroot.bb disables the final binary packages generation. You can try to add bbappend for shadow to do the customization. # don't create any packages # otherwise: dbus-dev depends on shadow-sysroot-dev which depends on shadow-sysroot # and this has

[yocto] Can't replace login.defs with shadow-sysroot bbappend

Hello list, i'm trying to replace /etc/login.defs on the target with my own one. So I created a shadow-sysroot_%.bbappend file with this content: FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${BPN}:" # As we're overriding login.defs_shadow-sysroot we have to readd the checksum for it here # as it's

[yocto] The kernel versions used by Yocto

Hi, I want to understand the kernel version selection criteria of Yocto release, can somebody please help to comment on it? I recall that Yocto uses the LTSI kernel, may I know if this is still the case? Best Regards, Zhenhua -- ___ yocto mailing

[linux-yocto] The kernel versions used by Yocto

Hi, I want to understand the kernel version selection criteria of Yocto release, can somebody please help to comment on it? I recall that Yocto uses the LTSI kernel, may I know if this is still the case? Best Regards, Zhenhua -- ___ linux-yocto