[yocto] uninative workflow

Hi, To be honest, I'm not entirely sure what the uninative stuff is (explanations or pointers to explanations appreciated!) but I'm trying to figure out how to work with it. Previously, generating an eSDK didn't require a uninative-tarball, but now, apparently, it does? Any idea why? So now, in

[yocto] [raspberrypi] raspi3 vs raspi2

Hi, I was wondering if there were any plans to create a MACHINE=raspberrypi3 that treats the raspi3 like the CortexA53 that it is instead of generating images that are backwards compatible with the CortexA7 that is the raspi2? Best regards, Trevor --

Re: [yocto] populate_sdk_ext: Unable to locate package nativesdk-buildtools-perl-dummy

Paul, > From: "Paul Eggleton" > Sent: Friday, 18 November, 2016 2:46:07 AM > I think the issue is this hasn't really been tested with deb > packaging. You > have hit a genuine bug though - would you mind filing a bug at > http://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org? Thanks

[yocto] devshell, KDE konsole & python3 TypeError

Hi, I'm on Morty and I hit the following bugs when trying to launch a devshell… I did a quick search and don't think they are solved. In poky/meta/lib/oe/terminal.py, the option "--nofork" doesn't exist in my konsole v16.08. I replaced it by option "--new-tab", which solved the problem. And

Re: [yocto] Yocto Project Status WW47

Stephen On 11/18/2016 08:35 AM, Jolley, Stephen K wrote: Current Dev Position: YP 2.3 M1 Next Deadline: YP 2.3 M1 by Dec. 12, 2016 SWAT team rotation: Leo -> Juro https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team Key Status/Updates: Thanks for the updates. ·2.1.2 QA

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 00/15] 8250/serial: Enable RuntimePM for HSUART

On 2016-11-17 06:06 PM, Nilesh Bacchewar wrote: Backports HSUART RuntimePM patches from 4.9x to linux-yocto-4.4. Patches have not been submitted upstream and are in progress to be upstreamed, hence may not be final. Patch has been rebased on bxt-rebase branch and targeted for bxt-rebase branch.

[yocto] Yocto Project Status WW47

Current Dev Position: YP 2.3 M1 Next Deadline: YP 2.3 M1 by Dec. 12, 2016 SWAT team rotation: Leo -> Juro https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team Key Status/Updates: *2.1.2 QA report is out and likely to be released imminently. *The QA report for

Re: [yocto] raspberry pi gtkmm_3.0.bb

st': > >> > | > >> > /usr/src/debug/gcc-runtime/6.2.0-r0/gcc-6.2.0/build.arm-poky > >> -linux-gnueabi.arm-poky-linux-gnueabi/arm-poky-linux-gnueabi > >> /libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/../../../../../../../../../../work- > >> shared/gcc-6.2.0-r0/gcc-6.2.0/libstd

Re: [yocto] raspberry pi gtkmm_3.0.bb

ky >> -linux-gnueabi.arm-poky-linux-gnueabi/arm-poky-linux-gnueabi >> /libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/../../../../../../../../../../work- >> shared/gcc-6.2.0-r0/gcc-6.2.0/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/ >> condition_variable.cc:133: >> > undefined reference to `__dso_handle' >> > |

Re: [yocto] uninative vs. BB_NO_NETWORK

On 18 November 2016 at 14:58, Vuille, Martin (Martin) wrote: > Currently using Yocto 1.8, planning upgrade to 2.2 > > Per the Reference Manual, "The uninative class is now enabled by default > in Poky. [...] > With this class enabled, a tarball containing a pre-built C library

Re: [yocto] undefined references to `__dso_handle'

Hi, Did you have multilib installed!? Regards, 2016-11-17 15:27 GMT-02:00 Elazar Leibovich : > As far as I know, no customization, I didn't even switch GCC's version. I > installed clang alongside gcc, but didn't change the default. > > Can you refer me to what you have in

[yocto] uninative vs. BB_NO_NETWORK

Currently using Yocto 1.8, planning upgrade to 2.2 Per the Reference Manual, "The uninative class is now enabled by default in Poky. [...] With this class enabled, a tarball containing a pre-built C library is downloaded at the start of the build." We have to build with BB_NO_NETWORK = "1"