Hi,
I change libvncserver to 0.9.10 but it has depandancy on GTK+. Can't
compile. Unfortunately framebuffer has no in that distro.
Any other option for remote display on framebuffer?
Thank you.
Dne 3. 3. 2017 6:43 odpoledne napsal uživatel "Burton, Ross" <
ross.bur...@intel.com>:
On 3 Mar
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj
---
recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi_4.9.bb | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi_4.9.bb
b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi_4.9.bb
index dcca369..effa859 100644
--- a/recipes-kernel/linux
On 3 March 2017 at 16:23, Peter Balazovic wrote:
> | ../libvncserver/.libs/libvncserver.so: undefined reference to
> `gcry_md_open'
>
So many possibilities. Is gcry_* something that is also built by
libvncserver? If so then it's link order related and you'll need to fix the
makefiles. If it's
I inherited for
libvncserver_git.bb
...
inherit autotools pkgconfig
| ../libvncserver/.libs/libvncserver.so: undefined reference to
`gcry_md_open'
| ../libvncserver/.libs/libvncserver.so: undefined reference to
`gcry_md_read'
| ../libvncserver/.libs/libvncserver.so: undefined reference to
`gcry
actually thare are two recpies:
framebuffer-vncserver_git.bb
...
inherit cmake
...
libvncserver_git.bb
...
inherit autotools
...
where to "inherit" ?
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>
> On 3 March 2017 at 16:04, Peter Balazovic
> wrote:
>
>> I am not successfull to
Hello all,
I have a question to Yocto experts here. I have an OpenGL application which
runs on embedded Yotco Linux with framebuffer graphical backend.
I''d like to run and display application remotely on local Desktop. For X11
graphical backend I use x11vnc and now I am looking for a way to do it
On 3 March 2017 at 16:04, Peter Balazovic wrote:
> I am not successfull to include it into my image, here is a part of a log
> build:
>
> | ../git/configure: line 13581: syntax error near unexpected token `GTK,'
> | ../git/configure: line 13581: `PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GTK, gtk+-2.0,,:)'
> | NOTE: The
Hi Robert,
On 03/03/2017 15:53, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Andy Pont wrote:
>
>> Robert wrote...
>>
I would look at one of the P10xx series QorIQ boards. Digi-Key list
the P1021RDB-PC-ND and P1024RDB-PA-ND as being active parts which
are either single or dual e5
On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Andy Pont wrote:
> Robert wrote...
>
> > > I would look at one of the P10xx series QorIQ boards. Digi-Key list
> > > the P1021RDB-PC-ND and P1024RDB-PA-ND as being active parts which
> > > are either single or dual e500 cores.
> >
> > i would start with the machine definitio
Robert wrote...
> > I would look at one of the P10xx series QorIQ boards. Digi-Key list
> > the P1021RDB-PC-ND and P1024RDB-PA-ND as being active parts which
> > are either single or dual e500 cores.
>
> i would start with the machine definition files in the meta-fsl-ppc
> layer:
>
> http://g
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Robert P. J. Day
wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Andy Pont wrote:
>
> > Ross Burton wrote...
> >
> > >> it seems of limited value for YP to have a powerpc reference board,
> > >> mpc8315e-rdb, that is essentially impossible to procure. is there any
> > >> effort being
Ross Burton wrote...
>> it seems of limited value for YP to have a powerpc reference board,
>> mpc8315e-rdb, that is essentially impossible to procure. is there any
>> effort being made to look around for a newer powerpc reference board
>> that people could actually buy?
>
>Do you have any suggest
On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Andy Pont wrote:
> Ross Burton wrote...
>
> >> it seems of limited value for YP to have a powerpc reference board,
> >> mpc8315e-rdb, that is essentially impossible to procure. is there any
> >> effort being made to look around for a newer powerpc reference board
> >> that peop
Based on the blacklist behaviour, recipes can be tagged as deprecated.
Such recipes will produce a warning message when included in a build but
unlike blacklisted recipes, the build will continue. Update the
documentation to support this new variable.
Signed-off-by: Joe MacDonald
---
This shoul
On 2017-03-03 8:41 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 3 March 2017 at 13:24, Robert P. J. Day mailto:rpj...@crashcourse.ca>> wrote:
it seems of limited value for YP to have a powerpc reference board,
mpc8315e-rdb, that is essentially impossible to procure. is there any
effort being made t
On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 3 March 2017 at 13:24, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> it seems of limited value for YP to have a powerpc reference
> board, mpc8315e-rdb, that is essentially impossible to
> procure. is there any effort being made to look around for a
>
On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On 3 March 2017 at 10:59, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> also, not sure how meta-yocto-bsp fits that description. it neither
> contains sub-layers, nor is itself a sub-layer of a higher-level
> layer. sure, it comes along as part of the che
On 3 March 2017 at 10:59, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> also, not sure how meta-yocto-bsp fits that description. it neither
> contains sub-layers, nor is itself a sub-layer of a higher-level
> layer. sure, it comes along as part of the checkout of "poky", but the
> poky checkout itself is not a lay
On 3 March 2017 at 13:24, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> it seems of limited value for YP to have a powerpc reference board,
> mpc8315e-rdb, that is essentially impossible to procure. is there any
> effort being made to look around for a newer powerpc reference board
> that people could actually buy
it seems of limited value for YP to have a powerpc reference board,
mpc8315e-rdb, that is essentially impossible to procure. is there any
effort being made to look around for a newer powerpc reference board
that people could actually buy?
rday
--
=
Collection of minor cleanups to BSP Guide:
* Standardize on spelling of "BSP layer" rather than "BSP Layer"
* Describe YP reference boards in more detail (architecture, ...)
* Bump up several references to kernel "4.4" to "4.9"
* Replace meaningless "bsp_name.conf" with "machine.conf"
* Add a few
in section 1.2.9:
"Suppose you are using the linux-yocto_4.4.bb recipe to build the
kernel. In other words, you have selected the kernel in your
bsp_name.conf file by adding these types of statements: ..."
^
um ... what? and just below that:
"Note
When the preferred provider is
still in BSP Guide:
"Note
If the BSP's binary directory is missing or the directory has no
images, an existing README.sources file is meaningless."
yet the meta-intel layer has that file but no binary/ directory, so is
the above the proper explanation of README.sources?
i ha
On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 09:29:24 +
Paul Barker wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 20:13:07 -0800
> Andrei Gherzan wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 07:39:13PM +, p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
> > > From: Paul Barker
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul Barker
> > > ---
> > > recipes-kernel/linu
in current BSP Guide:
"Some layers function as a layer to hold other BSP layers. An example
of this type of layer is the meta-intel layer, which contains a number
of individual BSP sub-layers, as well as a directory named common/
full of common content across those layers. Another example is th
jsut one of those things that starts to grate on me after a while
... while reading BSP guide, the text bounces back and forth between
"BSP Layer" and "BSP layer."
personally, i'm not a huge fan of upper case (quelle surprise!), so
unless it's being used as a proper name, i think "BSP layer"
Hi Adrian,
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 01:50:14PM +0100, Adrian Calianu wrote:
> Fix was done according to latest changes where dependencies
> are installed into a per-recipe sysroot.
>
> Adrian Calianu (3):
> classpath-native: fix build dependencies
> libecj: fix build issues by adding missing d
I don't have any video or display hardware on my system, but I want to
install an X server and window manager in order to VNC in. Is this
possible? Would using the matchbox-* recipes allow me to do this?
Would I also need any x11 recipes? Thanks for any suggestions.
--
_
28 matches
Mail list logo
