Re: [yocto] Yocto Dev Day at ELC 2017

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 1:41 AM, Steve Burt wrote: > The slides are on the wiki: > https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/DevDay_US_2017 > > Hope this helps. > Thanks for the link, Steve: appreciated! > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 2:22 AM, Andrea Galbusera wrote:

Re: [yocto] any rumblings about a newer YP powerpc reference board than mpc8315e-rdb?

Hi, I didn't check availability, but p2020rdb is it's successor (and similar, 2010). Regards, Leon > On 3 Mar 2017, at 14:51, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >> On Fri, 3 Mar 2017, Burton, Ross wrote: >> >> On 3 March 2017 at 13:24, Robert P. J. Day

Re: [yocto] Systemd recipe breaks resolvconf

On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 5:33 AM, Martin Townsend wrote: > Hi, > > I've just tracked down a problem with resolvconf not working on my > board and it was due to the systemd recipe creating the resolv.conf > link and patching etc.conf. Here's the snippet (I've taken it from >

[yocto] [PATCH] yocto-docs: Various formatting/clarification adjustments to BSP Guide

Collection of aesthetic/formatting/clarification fixes to BSP Guide, including: * Adjust some directory names to have trailing slash * Reword some paragraphs for clarity * Add s inside s for consistency and other minor tweaks. Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day --- diff

[yocto] Systemd recipe breaks resolvconf

Hi, I've just tracked down a problem with resolvconf not working on my board and it was due to the systemd recipe creating the resolv.conf link and patching etc.conf. Here's the snippet (I've taken it from krogoth but it is still there in morty). if ! ${@bb.utils.contains('PACKAGECONFIG',

[yocto] standards for YP documentation markup?

more nitpicky pedantry ... i mentioned this once upon a long time ago, but i thought i'd revisit it. there is a fair bit of inconsistency in the docbook markup in the YP docs such that, even though the end-product looks reasonable, the markup kind of bounces around all over the place and, in

[yocto] occasional confusion in bsp guide, mixing BSP layer name and machine name

as i claw my through the bsp guide, i notice the occasional confusion between referring to the BSP layer itself and a machine supported by that layer. a couple times, i've found references to the alleged machine configuration file "conf/bsp_name.conf" (which i'm changing to

[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH] linux-raspberrypi: Default to 4.9 kernel

4.9 is now declared stable for raspberrypi Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- conf/machine/include/rpi-default-versions.inc | 2 +- conf/machine/raspberrypi3-64.conf | 2 -- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git

[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 2/2] firmware: Update to 20170215 release

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- recipes-bsp/common/firmware.inc | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes-bsp/common/firmware.inc b/recipes-bsp/common/firmware.inc index 8aea628..7487b49 100644 --- a/recipes-bsp/common/firmware.inc +++

[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 1/2] userland: Update to latest

Forward port the patches Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- ...01-Allow-applications-to-set-next-resource-handle.patch | 6 +++--- .../0002-wayland-Add-support-for-the-Wayland-winsys.patch | 14 +++--- .../userland/0003-wayland-Add-Wayland-example.patch| 6 +++---