[yocto] Files missing in SDK

As previously discussed, I'm trying to build an SDK for my system using -c populate_sdk_ext. For the most part, I have this working except for one package which is missing a number of files. I've looked at the details of the nativesdk-ti-cgt-pru package which was built as part of this process:

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 1/2] linux-raspberrypi_4.4: Update to 4.4.48

Hi Paul On 2/13/17 3:32 PM, p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote: > From: Paul Barker > > Signed-off-by: Paul Barker > --- > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-raspberrypi_4.4.bb | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH] xserver-xf86-config: remove evdev configuration

On 2/16/17 3:49 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: > xorg-xserver recommends xf86-input-libinput since oe-core's commit > > | commit 2d005faff6341a81a2afae28860101ba9db51ae8 > | Author: Jussi Kukkonen > | Date: Wed Oct 26 11:37:38 2016 +0300 > | > |conf: Use

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] [PATCH 0/2] wic: fixes for wic support

On 2/27/17 3:46 AM, Maciej Borzecki wrote: > A small series with 2 patches that enable using wic (once again). > > The first patch moves sdimage-wks to ${LAYERDIR}/wic. This is already > implemented in meta-yocto-bsp. The goal is to make wks files easier to > find. Since Yocto is in general

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH] gstreamer1.0-omx: remove bbappend for version 1.2.0

On 3/7/17 4:07 AM, Paul Barker wrote: > On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:28:03 +0200 > "Maxin B. John" wrote: > >> OE-Core rev: aa06a18d59eb391d1a7ace9daa0681bdf8daf17f >> removed gstreamer1.0-omx_1.2.0 recipe. >> >> Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John >> --- >>

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH] features: add Intel Memory Protection Extensions

On 2017-03-10 2:34 PM, Mikko Ylinen wrote: Hi, On 10/03/17 20:33, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2017-03-10 02:44 AM, Mikko Ylinen wrote: This commit adds a kernel feature to have the kernel support for Intel Memory Protection Extensions (MPX). A quote from kernel arch/x86/Kconfig: "MPX provides

[yocto] [meta-gplv2][PATCH] dosfstools: Restore support for the -h option to mkdosfs

From: Emma Holmberg Ohlsson The support for the -h option to mkdosfs was accidentally removed when the target and native versions of the recipe were unified back in Dylan... Signed-off-by: Emma Holmberg Ohlsson Signed-off-by:

Re: [yocto] [Openembedded-architecture] Proposal: dealing with language-specific build tools/dependency management tools

Hi Alexander, Thanks for bringing up this important topic. There is no doubt we're seeing paradigm shifts in the way applications are written, built, and packaged; as well as a complete lack of interest in licensing. Although the trend is to not care about licensing, I believe it is vitally

Re: [yocto] [Openembedded-architecture] Proposal: dealing with language-specific build tools/dependency management tools

Hi Alexander, thanks for kicking off the topic, sounds like its kinda overdue. While I have no really good solution (d'oh!), please find below thoughts and bits and pieces about some of the points. *Recipes* My gut feeling say auto-generation of the recipes is a good way to go. Yet I am

[yocto] Literal curly braces inside python expression

Hi all, I'm having a hard time trying to put some literal curly braces in a python expression and I need a bit of help to solve this problem. I minimal example to reproduce this. If in my recipe i have: VAR1 = "1" VAR2 = "${@base_conditional('VAR1', '1', '{ONE}', '{TWO}', d)}" do_install() {

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH] features: add Intel Memory Protection Extensions

Hi, On 10/03/17 20:33, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2017-03-10 02:44 AM, Mikko Ylinen wrote: This commit adds a kernel feature to have the kernel support for Intel Memory Protection Extensions (MPX). A quote from kernel arch/x86/Kconfig: "MPX provides hardware features that can be used in

Re: [yocto] help

-- -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org<mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto yocto Info Page<https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto> yocto Info Page<https://lists.yoctopro

Re: [yocto] [bitbake] Failed to patch "defconfig" for linux kernel

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Karim ATIKI wrote: > > > OK. > But how then is this file "bt.cfg" included in the compilation process ? > > > ​linux-yocto​ have provisions for it. It basically users merge-config feature of kernel kconfig. > >

Re: [yocto] [bitbake] Failed to patch "defconfig" for linux kernel

OK. But how then is this file "bt.cfg" included in the compilation process ? De : Khem Raj Envoyé : vendredi 10 mars 2017 19:53 À : Karim ATIKI Objet : Re: [yocto] [bitbake] Failed to patch "defconfig" for linux kernel On Fri, Mar 10,

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH] features: add Intel Memory Protection Extensions

On 2017-03-10 02:44 AM, Mikko Ylinen wrote: This commit adds a kernel feature to have the kernel support for Intel Memory Protection Extensions (MPX). A quote from kernel arch/x86/Kconfig: "MPX provides hardware features that can be used in conjuction with compiler-instrumented code to check

Re: [yocto] [Openembedded-architecture] Supporting MEAN framework in Yocto

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 5:49 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > Hello, > > I've done some research around MEAN stack and how Yocto could support it, > and here are the findings. > > *What is MEAN* > > MEAN (http://mean.io/) is a Javascript framework for writing web

Re: [yocto] help

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 6:25 AM, Suneetha Lakshmi G < suneeth...@tataelxsi.co.in> wrote: > Hi All, > > > Im new to yocto and trying to build for my customer device im facing this > issue. > > > | arm-linux-gnueabi-xgcc: error: unrecognized command line option > '-mgeneral-regs-only' > |

Re: [yocto] [bitbake] Failed to patch "defconfig" for linux kernel

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Karim ATIKI wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm currently trying to patch the linux kernel 3.8.13-r2 of an ARM based > board (Hachiko) in order to enable Bluetooth and RFCOMM support. > > > Currently, I select these options with bitbake -c menuconfig

Re: [yocto] What happened to 'depexp'?

On 10 March 2017 at 16:30, Rudolf J Streif wrote: > While I can concur that it is good to have more functionality, why was it > deemed necessary to entirely deprecate 'depexp'? I think now that the Yocto > Project is maturing, it would be good to pay more attention to

Re: [yocto] What happened to 'depexp'?

On Friday, March 10, 2017 2:46:55 AM PST Burton, Ross wrote: > On 10 March 2017 at 10:45, Gary Thomas wrote: > > What happened to 'depexp'? Is 'taskexp' supposed to be the replacement? > > Yes. > > depexp was great at leaving things out, whereas taskexp shows everything. >

Re: [yocto] [Openembedded-architecture] Proposal: dealing with language-specific build tools/dependency management tools

On 3/10/17 8:58 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Alexander Kanavin > wrote: >> On 03/10/2017 04:30 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>> >>> When integrating the CHICKEN Scheme support onto the Yocto Project we >>> dealt it using their

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH v2] recipes-graphics: mali-userspace: add

Hey, Could you : 1/ change your short commit message to something like "recipes-graphics: Add recipe for mali-userspace". Just "add" does not make sense to me. 2/ Improve your long commit message. 3/ Add the license to your recipe :) 4/ Change the name of the recipe, call it... rockchip-mali

Re: [yocto] Raspberry Pi2 Fails to boot into LXDE.

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 5:25 AM, Steve Plant wrote: > Hi Khem, > > > I was finally able to SSH into the raspberry pi and found the Xorg.log file, > exactly where you said it would be. > > > Looking at it, for some reason Xorg cannot find the module evdev. I have > looked for

Re: [yocto] [Openembedded-architecture] Proposal: dealing with language-specific build tools/dependency management tools

On 03/10/2017 04:58 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: I'd like to avoid generating entire separate recipes though, because that implies your custom-written tool would be figuring out where the dependency source came from in the first place, and what are its own dependencies, when creating the recipe,

Re: [yocto] [Openembedded-architecture] Proposal: dealing with language-specific build tools/dependency management tools

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On 03/10/2017 04:30 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> >> When integrating the CHICKEN Scheme support onto the Yocto Project we >> dealt it using their installation tool but making the package of >>

[yocto] [bitbake] Failed to patch "defconfig" for linux kernel

Hi, I'm currently trying to patch the linux kernel 3.8.13-r2 of an ARM based board (Hachiko) in order to enable Bluetooth and RFCOMM support. Currently, I select these options with bitbake -c menuconfig virtual/kernel I'd like to use a patch on the defconfig in order to avoid the menuconfig

Re: [yocto] [Openembedded-architecture] Proposal: dealing with language-specific build tools/dependency management tools

On 03/10/2017 04:30 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: When integrating the CHICKEN Scheme support onto the Yocto Project we dealt it using their installation tool but making the package of individual packages (eggs, in this specific case) as individual recipes. We went further and automated the recipe

Re: [yocto] help

_ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto yocto Info Page<https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto> yocto Info Page<https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto> lists.yoctoproject.org Discussion of all things about the Yocto Project. Read o

Re: [yocto] [Openembedded-architecture] Proposal: dealing with language-specific build tools/dependency management tools

Hello Alexander, On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > The new generation of programming languages (think node.js, Go, Rust) is a > poor fit for the Yocto build model which follows the traditional Unix model. > In particular, those new

Re: [yocto] help

On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, Suneetha Lakshmi G wrote: > Hi All, > > Im new to yocto and trying to build for my customer device im facing > this issue. first advice is to use meaningful subject lines ... simply yelling "help" is a good way to get people to not take you seriously right from the

Re: [yocto] update mechanisms

On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 14:35 +0100, Kristian Amlie wrote: > On 10/03/17 14:02, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 16:35 -0800, Eystein Måløy Stenberg wrote: > >> On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 10:45 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > >>> On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 10:01 +0100, Stefano Babic wrote: > Hi

Re: [yocto] Raspberry Pi2 Fails to boot into LXDE.

On 2017-03-10 14:25, Steve Plant wrote: Hi Khem, I was finally able to SSH into the raspberry pi and found the Xorg.log file, exactly where you said it would be. Looking at it, for some reason Xorg cannot find the module evdev. I have looked for this but cannot find where it is supposed to

[yocto] Proposal: dealing with language-specific build tools/dependency management tools

Hello all, *Introduction* The new generation of programming languages (think node.js, Go, Rust) is a poor fit for the Yocto build model which follows the traditional Unix model. In particular, those new development environments have no problem with 'grabbing random stuff from the Internet'

Re: [yocto] update mechanisms

On 10/03/17 14:02, Patrick Ohly wrote: > On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 16:35 -0800, Eystein Måløy Stenberg wrote: >> On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 10:45 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: >>> On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 10:01 +0100, Stefano Babic wrote: Hi Patrick, On 30/11/2016 15:59, Patrick Ohly wrote: >

Re: [yocto] Raspberry Pi2 Fails to boot into LXDE.

Hi Khem, I was finally able to SSH into the raspberry pi and found the Xorg.log file, exactly where you said it would be. Looking at it, for some reason Xorg cannot find the module evdev. I have looked for this but cannot find where it is supposed to be located. I did notice that there was

Re: [yocto] update mechanisms

On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 16:35 -0800, Eystein Måløy Stenberg wrote: > On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 10:45 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 10:01 +0100, Stefano Babic wrote: > > > Hi Patrick, > > > > > > On 30/11/2016 15:59, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > > > I've started a Wiki page > > > >

Re: [yocto] What happened to 'depexp'?

On 10 March 2017 at 10:45, Gary Thomas wrote: > What happened to 'depexp'? Is 'taskexp' supposed to be the replacement? > Yes. depexp was great at leaving things out, whereas taskexp shows everything. It's more, but it's not missing bits. Ross --

[yocto] What happened to 'depexp'?

I realized today that 'depexp' is no longer available, leaving only 'taskexp' (more detailed, but I find harder to use). What happened to 'depexp'? Is 'taskexp' supposed to be the replacement? Thanks -- Gary Thomas |

[yocto] (no subject)

suneeth...@tataelxsi.co.in -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto