On 3 May 2017 at 21:50, Chris Trobridge wrote:
> To improve startup speed I have decided to pre-compile python3 byte code
in my bb recipe. This is done semi automatically with the rpm build for
Fedora but I've not found anything similar for Yocto.
>
> I initially tried to use compileall:
>
> pyth
On 3 May 2017 at 19:50, Chris Trobridge wrote:
> The following works, as it uses the native python3 compiled by bitbake but
> it feels a little contrived. Is there a better way of specifying the
> native python3 interpreter, or a better way of getting my python byte code
> compiled prior to gene
Hello,
I am trying to enable tpm on an Intel target using yocto (morty) from
meta-security
When I activate the tpm-tools-2.0 feature in my configuration, I have
a compilation error (see log bellow)
Search for line:
| /usr/src/debug/glibc/2.24-r0/git/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:104:
undefined re
On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 12:12 +0200, Dominig Ar Foll wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to enable tpm on an Intel target using yocto (morty) from
> meta-security
>
> When I activate the tpm-tools-2.0 feature in my configuration, I have
> a compilation error (see log bellow)
> Search for line:
> | /usr
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:12 AM, Dominig Ar Foll
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to enable tpm on an Intel target using yocto (morty) from
> meta-security
>
> When I activate the tpm-tools-2.0 feature in my configuration, I have
> a compilation error (see log bellow)
> Search for line:
> | /usr/src
On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 08:45 -0400, Khem Raj wrote:
> Set
>
> SECURITY_CFLAGS = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}"
But that's just a workaround, right? Ideally the build rules of
tpm2.0-tools should be fixed to not need that.
--
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly
The content of this message is my personal opi
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 08:45 -0400, Khem Raj wrote:
>> Set
>>
>> SECURITY_CFLAGS = "${SECURITY_NO_PIE_CFLAGS}"
>
> But that's just a workaround, right? Ideally the build rules of
> tpm2.0-tools should be fixed to not need that.
>
yes it can be
Hi all,
I am trying to create a new recipe for Bazel (from Google):
https://bazel.build/versions/master/docs/install-compile-source.html
The standard compilation flow is relatively simple: "Unzip the archive and
call bash ./compile.sh; this will create a bazel binary in output/bazel.
This binary i
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Giuseppe Di Guglielmo <
giuseppe.diguglie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am trying to create a new recipe for Bazel (from Google):
> https://bazel.build/versions/master/docs/install-compile-source.html
>
> The standard compilation flow is relatively simple: "Unz
I made some further steps.
I attach the layer package that I am creating. You can add it to
conf/bblayers.conf.
The error that I the following. Let me know what you thing of it.
Thank you,
Giuseppe
$ bitbake bazel
Parsing recipes: 100%
|##
10 matches
Mail list logo