Re: [yocto] dynamic layer dependencies in meta-security

On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 14:39 -0700, akuster808 wrote: > > I would certainly caution against dynamic layerdepends/layerrecommends and > > instead focus on listing everything between what is required and what you > > want > > to add in addition -- then using the meta-freescale approach of only > >

[yocto] SDK license manifest

Hello, I am currently building an SDK and a disk image using morty. Learning quite a bit about Yocto. Eventually I will distribute both the SDK and the rootfs image to customers. I see that there is a license manifest generated for the full rootfs which is very useful. My question is, what

[yocto] [meta-qt5] SDK missing python-json (QtCreator)

Hi there, Since v3.6, QtCreator requires python-json for use with GDB. The Qt5 SDK doesn't ship this python package (tested with Pyro) and so it is impossible to debug a program due to the missing python package. (QtC 4.4 (to be released) should contain a workaround) Can this dependency be added

Re: [yocto] dynamic layer dependencies in meta-security

On 07/19/2017 05:29 AM, Mark Hatle wrote: On 7/19/17 1:57 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote: Hello Armin! I'm trying to use the latest meta-security master in refkit. Refkit runs yocto-compat-layer.py against its own layers, which then pulls in meta-security as one of the dependencies. That's where I

[yocto] [AUH] Upgrade status: 2017-07-20

AUH finished upgrade batch the result patches/logs can be found at: https://logs.yoctoproject.org/auh//20170718073040, next are the statistics: Recipe upgrade statistics: * Failed(do_configure): 5 json-glib, 1.3.2, Dengke Du libinput, 1.8.0, Jussi