This does some basic testing and checks.
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster
---
lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/sssd.py | 37 ++
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/sssd.py
diff --git a/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/sssd.py
include a few more RDEPEND packages. remove init script as there really
isn't one yet.
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster
---
recipes-security/sssd/sssd_1.16.3.bb | 14 --
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes-security/sssd/sssd_1.16.3.bb
Add systemd pkgconf via DISTRO_FEATURE
Fix uid/gid of sssd.conf
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster
---
.../sssd/{sssd_1.16.3.bb => sssd_1.16.4.bb} | 12
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
rename recipes-security/sssd/{sssd_1.16.3.bb => sssd_1.16.4.bb} (88%)
diff
Samba and libldb overlap in a few places. This is the simplest fix for
now.
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster
---
recipes-support/libldb/libldb_%.bbappend | 22 ++
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 recipes-support/libldb/libldb_%.bbappend
diff --git
This reverts commit 2488c965d6b1b440734f43326fb33ac642ac7b82.
This corrects an incorrect fix as pointed out by Adrian Bunk.
---
recipes-security/sssd/sssd_1.16.3.bb | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/recipes-security/sssd/sssd_1.16.3.bb
On 3/27/19 12:16 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 03:52:39PM -0700, akuster808 wrote:
>>
>> On 3/26/19 3:24 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 09:58:55AM -0700, Armin Kuster wrote:
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster
---
Hello Burton,
> Check what luajit is shipping and compare that to what the pkgconfig
> is looking for. Calling pkgconfig directly in your recipe's devshell
> is useful for this.
Thanks for the hint regarding the devshell.
Indeed, pkgconfig can not find luajit in the devshell - the path
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 00:06, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> Hi Burton,
>
> > > RDEPENDS_${PN} = "luajit"
> > > inherit autotools pkgconfig
> >
> > Considering you're trying to use luajit at build time, it's probably
> > sensible to have it as a build dependency instead (DEPENDS).
>
> I've just tried
Hi Burton,
> > RDEPENDS_${PN} = "luajit"
> > inherit autotools pkgconfig
>
> Considering you're trying to use luajit at build time, it's probably
> sensible to have it as a build dependency instead (DEPENDS).
I've just tried it without success - it still fails stating luajit can
not be found -
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 23:45, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> The bb-file specifies luajit as runtime-dependency as well as inherits
> pkgconfig:
>
> RDEPENDS_${PN} = "luajit"
> inherit autotools pkgconfig
Considering you're trying to use luajit at build time, it's probably
sensible to have it as a
Hi,
I am trying to compile an autotools based in-house project which
compiled as expected on angstrom-v2016.06-yocto2.
It is a rather boring setup where configure.ac checks for luajit using
the following line: "PKG_CHECK_MODULES([LJ], [luajit])".
The bb-file specifies luajit as
The libselinux SWIG wrapper imports shutil.
Signed-off-by: Chris PeBenito
---
recipes-security/selinux/libselinux.inc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/recipes-security/selinux/libselinux.inc
b/recipes-security/selinux/libselinux.inc
index 33621cc..6e115e3
Beautify the machine config files by making the names and descriptions
more uniform and verbose
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason
---
meta/conf/machine/qemuarm.conf| 4 ++--
meta/conf/machine/qemuarm64.conf | 4 ++--
meta/conf/machine/qemuarmv5.conf | 6 +++---
meta/conf/machine/qemumips.conf |
Beautify the machine config files by making the names and descriptions
more uniform and verbose
Signed-off-by: Jon Mason
---
meta-yocto-bsp/conf/machine/edgerouter.conf| 2 +-
meta-yocto-bsp/conf/machine/genericx86-64.conf | 5 ++---
meta-yocto-bsp/conf/machine/genericx86.conf| 5 ++---
General clean-up of the machine config files present in Yocto. Since
this encompasses files that would natively be in the oe-core and
meta-yocto-bsp repositories, I split them into 2 commits. However,
since they are similar, I sent them in the same email thread. I hope
this is acceptable.
Jon
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 12:51:54 -0400
A wrote:
> Thank you for the quick suggestion.
>
> Unfortunately, I tried setting OECMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH_MODE_LIBRARY to
> "ONLY", "NEVER", and "BOTH" separately, and none of the above
> worked. I must be doing something fundamentally wrong.
>
> Any other
Thank you for the quick suggestion.
Unfortunately, I tried setting OECMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH_MODE_LIBRARY to
"ONLY", "NEVER", and "BOTH" separately, and none of the above worked. I
must be doing something fundamentally wrong.
Any other suggestions?
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 12:30 PM Patrick
I'm having issues with a yocto build that is combining recipes that should
depend on each other, and I need a sanity check. Is this an ok forum for
stupid user questions?
The main idea is to have one recipe install some prebuilt libraries, and
have another cmake-based recipe use those libraries.
Hi
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 12:20:43 -0400
A wrote:
> I'm having issues with a yocto build that is combining recipes that
> should depend on each other, and I need a sanity check. Is this an
> ok forum for stupid user questions?
>
> The main idea is to have one recipe install some prebuilt
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 9:34 AM Paul Gortmaker
wrote:
>
> Bruce, Yocto kernel folks:
>
> Here is the next 4.18.x stable update "extension" primarily created
> for the Yocto project, continuing from the previous v4.18.32 release.
>
> There are about 260 commits here, based on commits chosen from
This is now merged.
Bruce
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 2:36 AM He Zhe wrote:
>
> This for 5.0 and master.
>
> Zhe
>
> On 3/25/19 2:33 PM, zhe...@windriver.com wrote:
> > From: He Zhe
> >
> > In the following commits, these two options have been replaced by
> > CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL which is in
Thanks Kevin,
This is now merged.
Bruce
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:28 AM Kevin Hao wrote:
>
> The two merge commits 107b161b1cbaf ("Merge branch 'v4.19/standard/base'
> into v4.19/standard/preempt-rt/base") and dc37b7080cd55 ("Merge tag
> 'v4.19.8' into linux-4.19.y-rt") almost have the same
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 12:40, Gabriele Zampieri wrote:
> So I just specify the dependencies in my recipes, and then remove
> IMAGE_INSTALL_append = " boost". Am I right?
Yes. Your recipe that uses boost just needs DEPENDS=boost as a
build-dependency. The linkage will be examined and the
Forgot to include the mailing list
-- Forwarded message -
Da: Gabriele Zampieri
Date: gio 28 mar 2019 alle ore 13:38
Subject: Re: [yocto] Trimming BOOST libraries installed
To: Burton, Ross
Thank you for the fast reply.
So I just specify the dependencies in my recipes, and
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 10:59, Gabriele Zampieri wrote:
> I'm building a custom image that install boost libraries:
>
> IMAGE_INSTALL_append = " boost"
>
> How can I trim the installed libraries? I see inside
> meta/recipes-support/boost/boost.inc a variable called BOOST_LIBS that lists
> all
Hi all,
I'm building a custom image that install boost libraries:
IMAGE_INSTALL_append = " boost"
How can I trim the installed libraries? I see inside
meta/recipes-support/boost/boost.inc a variable called BOOST_LIBS that
lists all the boost components, so in my custom-image.bb I tried:
Thanks Mike, Patrick,
I have been much clearer about the options to update the system and the
cost involved.
a greeting
Jairo
--
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
On 26-03-19 11:02, jairo wrote:
> El mar, 26-03-2019 a las 09:14 +0100, Patrick Boettcher escribió:
>> On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:05:47 +0100
>> jairo wrote:
...
> Yes, I know, it is somewhat risky, but I have only 512MB of nand
> memory, and we are getting a lot of software. I think we have to
>
The two merge commits 107b161b1cbaf ("Merge branch 'v4.19/standard/base'
into v4.19/standard/preempt-rt/base") and dc37b7080cd55 ("Merge tag
'v4.19.8' into linux-4.19.y-rt") almost have the same content, but
introduce two define of TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY for x86 arch. Drop one of
them to fix the
29 matches
Mail list logo
