Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Git commit process question.

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:41 AM Mark Hatle wrote: > > On 4/1/19 6:20 PM, akuster808 wrote: > > > > > > On 4/1/19 4:02 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > >> On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 15:33 -0700, akuster808 wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I have noticed a large number of git commits with no header > >>>

[yocto] Proposed new QA process

Given the new QA tooling (resulttool) available to manage QA test results and reporting, here was the proposed new QA process. The new QA process consists below: * Test Trigger * Test Planning * Test Execution * Test Result Store * Test Monitoring & Reporting

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] layer.conf: Add warrior to compatible release series

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- conf/layer.conf | 2 +- meta-security-compliance/conf/layer.conf | 2 +- meta-tpm/conf/layer.conf | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/conf/layer.conf b/conf/layer.conf index

[yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH] selinux: remove git version

The git version of libselinux libsemanage libsepol checkpolicy and policycoreutils are far behind the master branch and now they can not build due to the do_patch error. The current stable 2.8 version works well so we can remove them. Signed-off-by: Yi Zhao ---

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Git commit process question.

On 4/1/19 6:20 PM, akuster808 wrote: > > > On 4/1/19 4:02 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: >> On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 15:33 -0700, akuster808 wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have noticed a large number of git commits with no header >>> information being accepted. >> Can you be more specific about what "no

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Git commit process question.

On 4/1/19 4:02 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 15:33 -0700, akuster808 wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have noticed a large number of git commits with no header >> information being accepted. > Can you be more specific about what "no header information" means? You > mean a shortlog

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Git commit process question.

On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 15:33 -0700, akuster808 wrote: > Hello, > > I have noticed a large number of git commits with no header > information being accepted. Can you be more specific about what "no header information" means? You mean a shortlog and no full log message? Cheers, Richard --

[yocto] Git commit process question.

Hello, I have noticed a large number of git commits with no header information being accepted. Are we still following: https://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines regards, Armin -- ___ yocto mailing list

[yocto] Reminder: Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting @ Monthly from 8am to 8:30am on the first Tuesday (PST)

All, Just a reminder we will hold the monthly Yocto Project Technical Meeting at 8am PST tomorrow. (April 2nd) We will start planning for YP 2.8 Yocto Project Technical Team Meeting: We encourage people attending the meeting to logon and announce themselves on the Yocto Project IRC

[yocto] Yocto Project Unassigned Bugs - Help Needed

All, The triage team meets weekly and does its best to handle the bugs reported into the Bugzilla. The number of people attending that meeting has fallen, as have the number of people available to help fix bugs. One of the things we hear users report is they don't know how to help. We (the

[yocto] Python 3.6 - Import numpy gives "Importing the multiarray numpy extension module failed" error

Hi, I recently updated python from 3.5.2 to 3.6.8 for my Poky Morty - version 2.2.2 build and now I'm having issues with getting the numpy library to work. I thought it was a compatibility issue with python 3.6 and the version of numpy I was using, but after trying multiple numpy versions

[yocto] [meta-security][v2][PATCH 2/2] linux-yocto/5.0: add apparmor fragments

Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-5.0/apparmor.cfg | 15 +++ .../linux/linux-yocto-5.0/apparmor_on_boot.cfg| 1 + .../linux/linux-yocto-5.0/smack-default-lsm.cfg | 2 ++ recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-5.0/smack.cfg| 8

[yocto] [meta-security][v2][PATCH 1/2] linux-yocto: make bbappend version neutral

update apparmor configs [v2] Just update configs. leave versions intact. Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto/apparmor.cfg| 12 +++- .../linux/linux-yocto/apparmor_on_boot.cfg | 1 + recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_4.%.bbappend|

Re: [yocto] customising a bsp

On Mon, 1 Apr 2019, at 08:49, Sergio Torres Soldado wrote: > Hi Dimitris, > > That is very versatile thanks. It is a way of solving the issue. > > Just as a side note this is what I did so far trying to separate the > changes to the machine: > > added the following to a layer I created: > .

Re: [yocto] customising a bsp

Hi Dimitris, That is very versatile thanks. It is a way of solving the issue. Just as a side note this is what I did so far trying to separate the changes to the machine: added the following to a layer I created: . |-- conf | `-- machine | `-- raspberrypi3-custom.conf Initially

Re: [yocto] [Yocto][meta-qt5][qtwayland]Qtwayland recipe fails with Yocto 2.5

The compilation of features.egl was failing because wayland-client.h was not found in Yocto 2.5 sysroot of QTbase. In yocto 2.2, the sysroot was common so qtbase was able to find this header even without dependencies. Adding DEPENDS=wayland in qtbase recipe is compiling qtbase and qtwayland

Re: [yocto] customising a bsp

Hi Serj, I'm using the -r / -R options in bitbake in order to customize the image via global variables and be able to build different configurations for the same machine and distro. You you use the same option to create e.g. different versions. Have a look in the documentation