[linux-yocto] [linux-yocto-rt v5.0/standard/preempt-rt/base][PATCH 1/1] i915: Use local irq lock instead of irq disable regions

2019-05-28 Thread Liwei Song
From: Jiping Ma Use a local_irq_lock as a replacement for irq off regions. We keep the semantic of irq-off in regard to the pool->lock and remain preemptible. BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:974 in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 192, name:

Re: [yocto] Custom eSDK build fails

2019-05-28 Thread Priyanshu Sharma
I have made changes in populate_sdk_ext.bbclass to copy my layers during do_populate_sdk and that works fine. Now, I'm hitting failure at : *ERROR: Failed to generate filtered task list for extensible SDK *( after this it prints the contents of my custom conf-notes) Looking at the source of this

Re: [yocto] [patchtest-oe][PATCH] test_metadata_src_uri: new unittest detecting added patch files without modifying SRC_URI

2019-05-28 Thread Changqing Li
On 5/28/19 10:53 PM, akuster wrote: On 5/27/19 6:00 PM, Changqing Li wrote: ping On 4/29/19 2:10 PM, Changqing Li wrote: ping Does this mean you have a working knowledge of patchtest? The one used by the project appears to be off line.  Can you help? kind regards, Armin I have do some

Re: [yocto] prelink-cross with -fno-plt

2019-05-28 Thread Mark Hatle
Sorry for my delayed reply. I was out on a business trip. Did you try this with the ld.so statistics to see if the relocations were indeed reduced at runtime? One of my worries with these changes (since I am not an ELF expert either) is that we make a change that doesn't actually do anything --

[yocto] Using the SDK and CMAKE GNUInstallDirs for multilib target

2019-05-28 Thread Måns Zigher
Hi, Not really a Yocto question but I am trying to build an application using our SDK. We are using CMake to build and are using GNUInstallDIrs for managing our install paths. I thought GNUInstallDirs should have the detected that the SDK was a multilib which it dose in regards to finding

Re: [yocto] [patchtest-oe][PATCH] test_metadata_src_uri: new unittest detecting added patch files without modifying SRC_URI

2019-05-28 Thread akuster
On 5/27/19 6:00 PM, Changqing Li wrote: > ping > > On 4/29/19 2:10 PM, Changqing Li wrote: >> ping >> Does this mean you have a working knowledge of patchtest? The one used by the project appears to be off line.  Can you help? kind regards, Armin >> On 3/5/19 5:59 PM,

[yocto] Yocto Project Status WW22'19

2019-05-28 Thread Richard Purdie
Current Dev Position: YP 2.8 M1Next Deadline: YP 2.8 Milestone 1 Cutoff June 9th, 2019 SWAT Team Rotation: * SWAT lead is currently: Chen * SWAT team rotation: Chen -> Armin on May. 31, 2019 * SWAT team rotation: Armin -> Anuj on June 7, 2019 *

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] samhain: add rconflict for client and server mode

2019-05-28 Thread akuster808
On 5/27/19 7:37 PM, changqing...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Changqing Li > > Signed-off-by: Changqing Li merged.  thanks, Armin > --- > recipes-ids/samhain/samhain-client_4.3.2.bb | 1 + > recipes-ids/samhain/samhain-server_4.3.2.bb | 1 + > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git

[yocto] [prelink-cross][PATCH] Enable prelink-cross to work on binaries built with -fno-plt

2019-05-28 Thread Shane Peelar
Make an assert in arch-x86_64.c a conditional if to handle things the same way as other arches. Enables binaries built with -fno-plt to be prelinked. 0001-arch-x86_64.c-Make-assert-conditional.patch Description: Binary data -- ___ yocto mailing list

[yocto] monit lcrypt issue

2019-05-28 Thread Ronan GAILLARD
monit lcrypt issue: Expose lcrypt while building monit with Yocto Thud When building monit using Yocto Thud the following error pops while building monit 5.25.2 : /usr/src/debug/monit/5.25.2-r0/monit-5.25.2/src/util.c:1675: undefined reference to `crypt’ Older versions of glibc supplied a

[yocto] building SDK fails due to libssp missing

2019-05-28 Thread Georgi Georgiev
Hello community, Recently our project switched to yocto 2.6.2 "thud" due to a lot of requests from SW team for too many package newer versions. The issue is that when building the image with populate_sdk command it fails with the following:

Re: [yocto] meta-sunxi maintained?

2019-05-28 Thread Dimitris Tassopoulos
Hi Enrico, I'm totally positive to any possibility for such integration. Personally, that was the first thing I've tried to do before I start this layer, but I've failed as it got really complex and the overhead was too much after some point (at least for me). If you have look it's actually a mix

Re: [yocto] [meta-swupdate] build fails under thud

2019-05-28 Thread Moritz Porst
Hello Matthias, Thank you, your help is much appreciated. Seems I have misunderstood how to add swupdate to my image. However the swupdate package somehow has to put an initramfs in place since to my understanding it is also possible to do updates without 2 rootfs available which would require

Re: [yocto] meta-sunxi maintained?

2019-05-28 Thread Belisko Marek
Hi Dimitris, On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 12:06 PM Dimitris Tassopoulos wrote: > > Hi Belisko, > > I was thinking about this also, too. The only reason is that in meta-sunxi > they do a great job and they keep their layer clean, which is great I think. > The other layers are just based on the

Re: [yocto] meta-sunxi maintained?

2019-05-28 Thread Dimitris Tassopoulos
Hi Belisko, I was thinking about this also, too. The only reason is that in meta-sunxi they do a great job and they keep their layer clean, which is great I think. The other layers are just based on the armbian distro, which is a lot different, but for me it was much easier to integrate their

Re: [yocto] meta-sunxi maintained?

2019-05-28 Thread Belisko Marek
Hi Maciej, On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:48 AM Maciej Pijanowski wrote: > > > On 27.05.2019 19:32, Belisko Marek wrote: > > Hi Enrico, > Hi, > > > > On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 5:44 PM Enrico > > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> i try to keep it maintained, but now i just have a lime2 for testing > >> on

Re: [yocto] meta-sunxi maintained?

2019-05-28 Thread Belisko Marek
Hi Dimitris, On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:01 AM Dimitris Tassopoulos wrote: > > Hi Belisko, > > you can also have a look in to this layer: > http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-allwinner-hx/ > It's for allwinner H2,H3 and H5 boards that already have support on

Re: [yocto] meta-sunxi maintained?

2019-05-28 Thread Maciej Pijanowski
On 27.05.2019 19:32, Belisko Marek wrote: > Hi Enrico, Hi, > > On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 5:44 PM Enrico wrote: >> Hi, >> >> i try to keep it maintained, but now i just have a lime2 for testing >> on real hardware, and i don't have the resources to do test builds for >> all the supported boards. >>

Re: [yocto] Building single package as image, respecting dependencies

2019-05-28 Thread Paul Barker
On 24/05/2019 15:28, Norman Stetter wrote: Is there no way to simply force bitbake to only build the packages I want, ignoring dependencies? We used to build the image like this before, using PTXDist. Everything else seems to be a dirty hack. Can you just collect the extra packages

Re: [yocto] [poky] yocto is unstable to build final image when recipe has slash in SRCBRANCH

2019-05-28 Thread Paul Barker
On 24/05/2019 20:38, Davis Roman wrote: Hello, In my recipe, I've found that a forward slash in SRCBRANCH, results in an error during the final image construction, SRCBRANCH = "feature/compile_with_gcc7_4_rocko_toolchain" Error given: Collected errors:  * opkg_prepare_url_for_install:

Re: [yocto] meta-sunxi maintained?

2019-05-28 Thread Dimitris Tassopoulos
Hi Belisko, you can also have a look in to this layer: http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-allwinner-hx/ It's for allwinner H2,H3 and H5 boards that already have support on Armbian. Pretty much is just a Yocto layer with all the patches and BSP support from Armbian.