On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 9:27 AM Szabolcs Báder wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I created this code:
>
> ```
> # u-boot standalone hello-world.c test image
> require recipes-core/images/core-image-base.bb
>
> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "^rpi$"
>
> ENABLE_UART="1"
> RPI_USE_U_BOOT="1"
>
> # maybe works??
>
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 9:27 AM Szabolcs Báder wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I created this code:
>
> ```
> # u-boot standalone hello-world.c test image
> require recipes-core/images/core-image-base.bb
>
> COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "^rpi$"
>
> ENABLE_UART="1"
> RPI_USE_U_BOOT="1"
>
> # maybe works??
>
Hi Zoran,
On 7/9/19, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote:
> Jupiter,
>
> I never read carefully the whole mechanism how to bundle kernel with
> initramfs in YOCTO.
Given Yocto reach features and powerful capacities, I would thought
there must be some simple mechanism to bundle the kernel with
initramfs
merged
Bruce
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 3:51 AM Yongxin Liu wrote:
>
> Because CONFIG_DEV_DAX* are not supported in preempt-rt kernel, use
> two scc files for Non-RT kerel and RT kernel separately.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yongxin Liu
> ---
> .../intel-persistent-memory/intel-x86-64-dax.cfg | 7
merged
Bruce
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 4:24 AM Liwei Song wrote:
>
> Enable CONFIG_DRM_MGAG200=m to support Matrox Electronics MGA G200
> and include it in intel-x86 bsp.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liwei Song
> ---
> bsp/intel-x86/intel-x86.scc | 1 +
> features/mgag200/mgag200.cfg | 1 +
>
Minutes: Yocto Project Engineering Sync
When: Tuesday, July 09, 2019 8:00 AM-9:00 AM 1.
Attending: Richard, Armin, Michael, David, Trevor, Tim, Vineela, Bruce
* Richard: General notes
- Status report was sent last night:
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2019-July/045968.html
-
Jupiter,
I never read carefully the whole mechanism how to bundle kernel with
initramfs in YOCTO.
I have there a description how to organize kernel image WITHOUT
initramfs (only kernel image by itself) and separately initramfs as
final stage, so I can do the tests with Lava, but I developed
Thanks Zoran, I did see that link and your post to run mkimage. Did
you get zImage-initramfs? I have to admit, I lost in that long email
discussion with different approaches, I tried all set up, but there is
no zImage-initramfs to be generated, files built in deploy/images just
could not be used
On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 at 12:29, danwe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> while using the command:
> daniel@daniel-VirtualBox:~/bbb$ MACHINE=beaglebone bitbake core-immage-full
> cmdline
> I get the following ouput:
>
> Loading cache: 100% || Time:
> 0:00:03
> Loaded
Please, read the following thread:
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-July/041680.html
Zoran
___
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:43 PM JH wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been stuck to build zImage-initramfs for weeks. I've read Yocto
> latest document, but still failed to generate the
One thing on my prio list is to buy very powerful 16 or 32 INTEL core
6950 or + server. Maybe AMD Ryzen 32 or 64 core (most likely). This
almost eliminates this build problem... But in the current situation I
am presently, I could not even buy extra bubble gum. ;-)
I have only my HP Elite Book
Zoran,
I know you are not a Qt Layers expert. I am trying to describe my problem
to experts via common mails, so they will not missunderstand my issue.
Oh lord, whole new building... I am not a time traveller, but I can say
that I will wait for 10 hours or something for that to build, and it will
Onur,
I am not subject matter expert in Qt layers... Here is what I found
while searching for an answer to the problem...
Here is the .bb causing to you problems:
https://github.com/meta-qt5/meta-qt5/blob/sumo/recipes-qt/qt5/qtquick1_git.bb
It is sumo branch. I noted that thud branch does NOT
Hello Zoran!
Thank you for your answer, but that page is about the missing packages in
your configuration. There is no a missing dependency in my configuration.
The recipe "qtdeclarative" is already added.
Note: Sending again because sent as PM accidentally.
Thanks anyway!
Onur
Zoran
Maybe this:
https://www.technexion.com/support/knowledgebase/resolving-dependencies-issues-in-yocto/
Zoran
___
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 7:59 AM Onur Eser wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> I have talked to my BSP provider and they have solved the conflict files
> issue with an update. Now I am able
Because CONFIG_DEV_DAX* are not supported in preempt-rt kernel, use
two scc files for Non-RT kerel and RT kernel separately.
Signed-off-by: Yongxin Liu
---
.../intel-persistent-memory/intel-x86-64-dax.cfg | 7 +
.../intel-x86-64-pmem-preempt-rt.scc | 3 +++
16 matches
Mail list logo
