[yocto] [PATCH] ARM: Headfull JVM added.

2014-09-23 Thread Daniel Hilst SellI
I've added the headful version of the JVM. Also, I'm suggesting a new way of fetching. Since Oracle forces it's users to go to its website and accept the aggrement, non-human fetching is aways hack and error prone. What I sugest is that the build system ask for the user to visit the website,

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] ARM: Headfull JVM added.

2014-09-23 Thread Daniel Hilst Selli
On 09/23/2014 04:43 PM, Daniel Hilst SellI wrote: I've added the headful version of the JVM. Also, I'm suggesting a new way of fetching. Since Oracle forces it's users to go to its website and accept the aggrement, non-human fetching is aways hack and error prone. What I sugest

Re: [yocto] [oe] [meta-oracle-java][PATCH] Version update and Java for ARM

2014-07-25 Thread Daniel Hilst Selli
Can someone forward me the patch please, I can't apply it from web interface. Here is the link: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2014-June/020223.html Cheers, -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org

Re: [yocto] [oe] [meta-oracle-java][PATCH] Version update and Java for ARM

2014-07-25 Thread Daniel Hilst Selli
On 07/25/2014 11:47 AM, Daniel Hilst Selli wrote: Can someone forward me the patch please, I can't apply it from web interface. Here is the link: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2014-June/020223.html Cheers, Ok I got the patch, but can't apply it, got this message `fatal

[yocto] Conditional patches on kernel depending on board, how to maintain?

2014-06-12 Thread Daniel Hilst Selli
I have a SoM which will be used on several boards, this SoM has a base kernel for it, with its board-*.c file. In each board I may have different peripherals, so I have to patch the same board-*.c file depending on my target board, and that patches may be conflicting one each other. For