migrate.
I will probably go with your proposal to patch RPM5 for now and in future
will consider to implement verification of the signature in 'smart'.
Best regards,
Dimitri
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Mark Hatle
wrote:
> On 4/18/16 6:54 AM, Dmytro Milinevskyy wrote:
> >
it is exhaustively
verified.
Best regards,
Dimitri
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Dmytro Milinevskyy
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> currently I'm trying to enforce rpm signature verification on the target
> device and get weird bogus signature of the RPM packages when the signature
>
Hello,
currently I'm trying to enforce rpm signature verification on the target
device and get weird bogus signature of the RPM packages when the signature
is not enabled in the configuration.
The main issue that this signature is considered as valid by the RPM 5.4.14
which is used by Yocto. And t