Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH 3/3] linux-stable/5.2: add stable bbappend

2019-08-20 Thread Hongzhi, Song
Hi Armin, Do you know where is linux-stable_5.2.bb? Thanks, --Hongzhi On 8/14/19 7:54 AM, Armin Kuster wrote: Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster --- recipes-kernel/linux/linux-stable_5.2.bbappend | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) create mode 100644

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache] Question about profiling.scc

2019-08-07 Thread Hongzhi, Song
/19 10:43 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 11:44 PM Hongzhi, Song mailto:hongzhi.s...@windriver.com>> wrote: Hi Bruce, I see profiling.scc is included by kernel-cache/bsp/*, such as bsp/intel-x86 bsp/common-pc/ ... . My question is that is it necessary t

[linux-yocto] [kernel-cache] Question about profiling.scc

2019-08-05 Thread Hongzhi, Song
Hi Bruce, I see profiling.scc is included by kernel-cache/bsp/*, such as bsp/intel-x86 bsp/common-pc/ ... . My question is that is it necessary to open profiling.cfg defaultly? --Hongzhi -- ___ linux-yocto mailing list

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] umip: remove umip bbappend

2019-06-11 Thread Hongzhi, Song
ping Thanks, --Hongzhi On 5/30/19 10:26 AM, Hongzhi, Song wrote: This patch is for meta-cgl Thanks, --Hongzhi On 5/30/19 10:23 AM, Hongzhi.Song wrote: umip has been removed, so its bbappend should be removed too. Signed-off-by: Hongzhi.Song ---   meta-cgl-common/recipes-extended/umip

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] umip: remove umip bbappend

2019-05-29 Thread Hongzhi, Song
This patch is for meta-cgl Thanks, --Hongzhi On 5/30/19 10:23 AM, Hongzhi.Song wrote: umip has been removed, so its bbappend should be removed too. Signed-off-by: Hongzhi.Song --- meta-cgl-common/recipes-extended/umip/umip_%.bbappend | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) delete mode

Re: [linux-yocto] [linux-yocto-rt][PATCH] printk: revert part of code of printk emergency mechanism

2019-04-23 Thread Hongzhi, Song
On 4/24/19 9:47 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 9:35 PM Hongzhi, Song mailto:hongzhi.s...@windriver.com>> wrote: On 4/24/19 4:04 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: Since this is still being discussed on the -rt mailing list, I'm going to wait to see how that

Re: [linux-yocto] [linux-yocto-rt][PATCH] printk: revert part of code of printk emergency mechanism

2019-04-23 Thread Hongzhi, Song
at 11:20 PM Hongzhi, Song mailto:hongzhi.s...@windriver.com>> wrote: Please merge to v5.0/standard/preempt-rt/base and v5.0/standard/preempt-rt/intel-x86 --Hongzhi On 4/23/19 11:14 AM, Hongzhi.Song wrote: > Two commits from rt-kernel cause the following dis

Re: [linux-yocto] [linux-yocto-rt][PATCH] printk: revert part of code of printk emergency mechanism

2019-04-22 Thread Hongzhi, Song
Please merge to v5.0/standard/preempt-rt/base and v5.0/standard/preempt-rt/intel-x86 --Hongzhi On 4/23/19 11:14 AM, Hongzhi.Song wrote: Two commits from rt-kernel cause the following disorder log at the early stage of boot with qemux86-64. Maybe it has other disorder logs which I omit.

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH 0/5] Some kernel configs have been deprecated or changed.

2019-02-27 Thread Hongzhi, Song
On 02/27/2019 10:17 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 4:32 AM Hongzhi.Song wrote: Please merge to master and yocto-4.19. This serial of patches have been merged by yocto-4.18. [Begin with:

Re: [yocto] [yocto-kernel-tools][PATCH] tools/kconf_check: modify grep pattern

2018-12-12 Thread Hongzhi, Song
Thanks. So would you help to remedy the commit log while merging the patch? --Hongzhi On 12/13/2018 02:45 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 12/11/18 5:12 AM, Hongzhi.Song wrote: The cmd line, , can't match all expect config options. This is because that it is not always space after 'config'

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 2/2] intel-x86-64: Move 'CONFIG_NR_CPUS=256' to intel-x86-64.cfg

2018-11-11 Thread Hongzhi, Song
On 11/09/2018 10:06 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2018-11-08 8:45 p.m., Hongzhi, Song wrote: On 11/09/2018 03:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2018-11-07 9:05 p.m., Hongzhi.Song wrote: The maximum cpus are 64 on intel-x86-32. But intel-x86-64 support ranges from 1 to 8192. So we should move

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 2/2] intel-x86-64: Move 'CONFIG_NR_CPUS=256' to intel-x86-64.cfg

2018-11-08 Thread Hongzhi, Song
On 11/09/2018 03:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2018-11-07 9:05 p.m., Hongzhi.Song wrote: The maximum cpus are 64 on intel-x86-32. But intel-x86-64 support ranges from 1 to 8192. So we should move the config to intel-x86-64.cfg. ok. This makes more sense, but two questions:  - why limit

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] intel-x86-64: Move 'CONFIG_NR_CPUS=256' to intel-x86-64.cfg

2018-11-06 Thread Hongzhi, Song
Please merge to master/v4.18/v4.19 --Hongzhi On 11/07/2018 10:06 AM, Hongzhi.Song wrote: The maximum cpus are 64 on intel-x86-32. But intel-x86-64 can support 8192. Signed-off-by: Hongzhi.Song --- bsp/intel-x86/intel-x86-64.cfg | 3 +++ bsp/intel-x86/intel-x86.cfg| 1 - 2 files

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 1/1] BSPs: Some required kernel config is not enabled as expected

2018-09-06 Thread Hongzhi, Song
On 2018年09月06日 20:29, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2018-09-06 6:23 AM, Anuj Mittal wrote: On 09/06/2018 06:14 PM, Hongzhi.Song wrote: The following configs were introduced from SDK, not contained by kernel. So we should drop them. CONFIG_X86_INTEL_SBI_APL CONFIG_SUPPORT_HDMI

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] intel-x86: Some required kernel config is not enabled as expected

2018-09-05 Thread Hongzhi, Song
Please also merge it to yocto-4.18, because linux-yocto-rt_4.18 also faces with the same problem. Thanks, --Hongzhi On 2018年09月05日 14:15, Hongzhi.Song wrote: According to the changes before linux-4.18-rc6, we must add new dependency for some config option or modify them value. 1. If

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH] intel-x86: Some required kernel config is not enabled as expected

2018-09-05 Thread Hongzhi, Song
Please merge to master. --Hongzhi On 2018年09月05日 14:15, Hongzhi.Song wrote: According to the changes before linux-4.18-rc6, we must add new dependency for some config option or modify them value. 1. If "CONFIG_PINCTRL_SUNRISEPOINT=m", CONFIG_PINCTRL_INTEL cann't be set y, because

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Questions about udev rule and systemd-udev,relevant to mounting block device

2018-03-01 Thread Hongzhi, Song
Hi all, Does anyone have suggestion for me? Thanks. Hongzhi.Song On 2018年03月01日 18:35, Hongzhi, Song wrote: Defect:     The exiting method of automount of udev in /oe-core/meta/ /is using /automount.rules/ which call /mount.sh/ that using //bin/mount/ to mount device. But systemd

[yocto] Questions about udev rule and systemd-udev,relevant to mounting block device

2018-03-01 Thread Hongzhi, Song
Defect:     The exiting method of automount of udev in /oe-core/meta/ /is using /automount.rules/ which call /mount.sh/ that using //bin/mount/ to mount device. But systemd-udevd detaches /mount()/ operations done within the service from the rest of the system with MountFlag=slave, this