[yocto] Status Update

2013-05-28 Thread Richard Purdie
Its been a few weeks since I sent one of these out, mainly as I've not had much to report. Pending Patches === Patches have been steadily getting reviewed and merged. Some things took a little longer than is ideal due to travel on Saul and my part. I know Saul is still travelling.

[yocto] Gnome tests, taking inspiration from us!

2013-05-15 Thread Richard Purdie
I've just found out that there is currently a proposal in the Gnome project to change the way they write and run tests. I know Colin posted it a few weeks ago but somehow I missed the mail and I suspect others did too: https://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/InstalledTests When you read through this,

[yocto] Status Update

2013-05-07 Thread Richard Purdie
In summary its been a fairly quiet week, there are number of different holidays in different geos. Pending Patches === There has been a steady stream of 1.5 patches starting to appear. With Saul's help these have been tested on the autobuilder and then many have been merged into

Re: [yocto] Problem Installing Package Manager in FRI2

2013-04-30 Thread Richard Purdie
Hi, On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 14:24 -0600, Esteban Rivera wrote: I'm trying to generate an image for the FRI2 using the official Intel BSP provided in the Yocto Project website, in this image I want to include at least one package manager. I'm Using poky 8.0 with Hob GUI, from the recipes listed

[yocto] Status Update

2013-04-29 Thread Richard Purdie
I've promised to start sending out some kind of status updates. I have a few things that are worth communicating and we have a kind of fresh start with 1.5 so here goes. This one turned out lengthier than I'd like, I'm not planning on writing an essay in future! I'm also hoping this email will

[yocto] [PATCH] meta-jasperforest: Fix BBFILES

2013-04-23 Thread Richard Purdie
/build1/poky/meta-intel/meta-fri2/' and if I try to build MACHINE=fri2, I get strange errors due to the .bb files not being parsed. The fix is simply to use +=, just like every other layer.conf file. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org --- meta-jasperforest/conf

Re: [yocto] Splashscreen using psplash

2013-04-23 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 06:34 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: On 2013-04-23 06:29, Andreas Enbacka wrote: Hello, Thanks a lot for info, I will try with that. //Andreas -Original Message- From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com] Sent: 23. huhtikuuta 2013 15:09 To:

[yocto] [PATCH] linux-raspberrypi: Fix i2c issues

2013-04-21 Thread Richard Purdie
I was having intermittent i2c issues on the device until I applied this kernel patch which I found online. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org --- .../sl030raspberrypii2ckernel.patch| 32 recipes-kernel/linux/linux

[yocto] [PATCH] linux-libc-headers-raspberrypi: Drop, its unneeded and bad practise

2013-04-21 Thread Richard Purdie
is 3.6. There is nothing special about these headers so lets remove them and use the standard system provided recipe, avoding any rebuilds. I tested the various other recipes in the layer and there doesn't seem to be any dependency on these headers. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur

Re: [yocto] Change in 'devshell' behaviour

2013-04-19 Thread Richard Purdie
) the shell is run using my user id. With a newer poky rev 90b98764555945a186562ca8d501a9585ce2b23f, the shell runs as 'root'. This change came with this revision: commit 4dc31a327be1a506e78e1d028db08ceee22a216f Author: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org Date: Thu Mar 28 13

Re: [yocto] 1.4_M6.rc2

2013-04-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2013-04-17 at 13:14 -0700, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote: We're delayed slightly for the 1.4_M6.rc2 build. The build should be soonish, once RP gives me the thumbs up. Please adjust your schedules accordingly, we're hoping to get this started in a few hours. We do have a 1.6_M6.rc2

Re: [yocto] Yocto 1.4_M5 released

2013-04-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 13:40 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Monday 15 April 2013 07:46:42 Trevor Woerner wrote: If I want to get an idea of what's going to be in the next release, dylan, which branch do I use: dylan or 1.4_M5? So, dylan is already quite a few bugfixes ahead of 1.4_M5 at

Re: [yocto] 1.4_M6.rc1 started

2013-04-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 15:48 -0700, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote: Our first release candidate for dylan has been started. It will be available this evening at: http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/pub/nightly/20130410-1 Repo Branch Hash pokydylan

[yocto] Yocto Project 1.5 Planning

2013-03-26 Thread Richard Purdie
We're now in the planning stages for the 1.5 release scheduled for about 6 months time. The process hasn't changed, if there are things you'd like to see worked on in this timeframe, please ensure there are entries for them in the bugzilla. Usually these are enhancement requests.

[yocto] Status updates going forward and communication

2013-03-26 Thread Richard Purdie
There have been some concerns raised at the TSC recently about how transparent the Yocto Project development process is and how and where it connects to OpenEmbedded. When you're dealing with companies and engineers there does need to be a process with things like schedules and in the interests of

Re: [yocto] perf build breaks in poky master branch

2013-03-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 14:06 +0100, Maxin B. John wrote: Hi, Perf build fails while trying to build core-image-minimal for qemux86, $ git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky $ cd poky $ source oe-init-build-env $ bitbake core-image-minimal Sorry about this, I merged a patch which didn't

[yocto] Feature Completion Deadline for 1.4 looming

2013-03-04 Thread Richard Purdie
The 1.4 release is scheduled for 2013/04/26. We have one milestone release before then, M5 on 2013/03/17. This is also the feature complete deadline. This means if there are features or other changes you want to see in 1.4, they need to be in by the 17th[1]. After the 17th we'll be doing

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Feature Completion Deadline for 1.4 looming

2013-03-04 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 14:00 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: The 1.4 release is scheduled for 2013/04/26. We have one milestone release before then, M5 on 2013/03/17. This is also the feature complete

Re: [yocto] Weekly build

2013-02-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 21:01 -0800, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote: I'm currently at ELC and am going to be a little slow with email. However, tonight I will be building M4 rc1. We are looking pretty green and had been hoping to use the last build for rc1, but we want to get it a little closer as to

Re: [yocto] PREFERRED_PROVIDER in image recipes

2013-01-30 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 00:37 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 13-01-28 11:16 AM, Daniel Kenji Morgan wrote: Sorry to bring up an old post, but I haven't managed to find information in the mail archives and bugzilla on how the issue stands as of today. The post I am referring to is as

[yocto] WebHob Mailing List Setup

2013-01-09 Thread Richard Purdie
Various people at various times have expressed an interest in webhob which will be a web interface to bitbake's functionality as an evolution of the capabilities of the current hob UI. There are some people looking at the design of it and who are actively working on figuring out what it should

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] latencytop: add sudo as runtime dependency

2013-01-04 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 12:30 +0100, Maxin B. John wrote: From: Maxin B. John maxin.j...@enea.com Latencytop needs superuser privileges. The latencytop plugin in eclipse invokes it as 'sudo latencytop'. So, it will be good to include sudo as a runtime dependency. Signed-off-by: Maxin B.

Re: [yocto] CyaSSL Yocto Recipe

2012-12-12 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 14:26 -0600, Chris Conlon wrote: On Sep 6, 2012, at 4:53 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: This looks like an interesting piece of software and a quick read through your webpages suggests there may be some interesting applications of this within OE which I'd love to explore

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] OpenEmbedded eV General Assembly

2012-11-07 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 19:21 -0800, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote: So how did it go? Were notes taken? Everything went fine and it didn't take that long, unlike some of the previous meetings. Notes are at the end of: http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Barcelona,_2012 Cheers, Richard

Re: [yocto] [PATCH resend][opkg-utils] opkg.py/opkg-build: fix creation of tar archives

2012-10-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 12:53 +0200, Steffen Sledz wrote: Since openSUSE 12.2 the installed tar uses posix instead of gnu encoding by default. This format is not fully supported by opkg and results in ipk packages not installable at the target. Collected errors: * get_header_tar: Unknown

Re: [yocto] [opkg-utils][PATCH 1/1] opkg-make-index: fix mis-indented else:

2012-10-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 18:29 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: From: Marc Olzheim m...@iphion.nl Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com --- opkg-make-index | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/opkg-make-index b/opkg-make-index index 1c3a8e1..44fa64d

Re: [yocto] The BitBake equivalent of Hello, World!

2012-10-05 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 20:00 -0700, Rudolf Streif wrote: Disclaimer: I am no Bitbake expert. I just put this together by rummaging through the Bitbake code for a couple of minutes. I am reasonably confident that what I am saying below is rather accurate but the Bitbake experts know better.

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] meta-tlk: fix ignored SRC_URI appends

2012-10-05 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 14:20 +0300, Mihai Lindner wrote: Fix SRC_URI appends ignored by meta-cedartrail and meta-crownbay. Used SRC_URI_append instead of SRC_URI. Also placed all variables in an .inc file to be required by all linux-yocto recipes in here, since all versions use the same.

Re: [yocto] eglibc fails to build

2012-10-04 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 10:02 +, Szankin, Maciej wrote: Hi, I’m having a hard time building yocto. I’m trying to build a tiny-poky / core-image-rt , but it doesn’t even matter as in every configuration it just fails on eglibc. Target architecture is x86. I will keep it clean so the

[yocto] Yocto Project 1.4 Planning Process

2012-10-03 Thread Richard Purdie
Whilst I appreciate people are concentrating on 1.3, we do also need to think about planning 1.4. https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_1.4_Features is seeded with the 1.4/Future targeted enhancement requests from the bugzilla. This is currently unsorted/unprocessed other than some guesses

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 00/62] denzil pull request 2

2012-10-02 Thread Richard Purdie
: include dbus-launch in the main dbus package Richard Purdie (5): distutils/steuptools: Fix files layout and unbreak builds opkg-utils: UPdate to version with python 2.6 fix autotools.bbclass: Add functionality to force a clean of ${B} when reconfiguring (and ${S} != ${B}) dbus

Re: [yocto] any success with spartan6-lx9mb?

2012-09-07 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 08:27 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Philip Balister phi...@balister.org wrote: On 09/06/2012 06:19 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: Speaking of zynq, I have a simple BSP here for the zc702 board: https://github.com/balister/meta-zynq

Re: [yocto] CyaSSL Yocto Recipe

2012-09-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 16:38 -0600, Chris Conlon wrote: Hi Saul, On Sep 6, 2012, at 4:14 PM, Saul Wold wrote: On 09/06/2012 02:59 PM, Chris Conlon wrote: Adding a direct link to the CyaSSL recipe file for review: www.yassl.com/files/yocto/cyassl_2.3.0.bb

Re: [yocto] yocto beagleboard.conf -- should it not go away?

2012-09-05 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 10:43 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote: On 05/09/12 10:15, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Wednesday 05 September 2012 09:49:11 Tomas Frydrych wrote: It has been considered witin OE to be best practice to append to BBPATH and not prepend, the thinking being that then the search

Re: [yocto] yocto beagleboard.conf -- should it not go away?

2012-09-05 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 10:45 -0400, William Mills wrote: On 09/05/2012 08:48 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 10:43 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote: On 05/09/12 10:15, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Wednesday 05 September 2012 09:49:11 Tomas Frydrych wrote: It has been considered

Re: [yocto] yocto beagleboard.conf -- should it not go away?

2012-09-05 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 09:58 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote: Hi Bruce, On 03/09/12 22:08, Bruce Ashfield wrote: That being said, taking a step back, what are you trying to get out of meta-yocto in this scenario ? a) I am targeting multiple chips, including TI Omap and Intel Atom.

Re: [yocto] yocto beagleboard.conf -- should it not go away?

2012-09-05 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 10:20 -0400, William Mills wrote: On 09/04/2012 07:23 PM, Darren Hart wrote: On 09/04/2012 01:25 PM, William Mills wrote: Darren: Is it true you can't get @ the Intel BSP's w/o also getting the poky distro defs? That does seem to mixing things a bit. (I am not

Re: [yocto] yocto beagleboard.conf -- should it not go away?

2012-09-05 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 09:21 +0100, Jack Mitchell wrote: On 03/09/12 22:08, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Tomas Frydrych tf+lists.yo...@r-finger.com wrote: snip... That being said, taking a step back, what are you trying to get out of meta-yocto in this

Re: [yocto] [poky] [PATCH v2] routerstationpro: move board off 3.0 and onto the 3.4 kernel

2012-08-22 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 11:24 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: The updated patch series to support this target is in place on the BSP specific branch in the 3.4 kernel tree now[1], so we can move it ahead off of the old 3.0 kernel. [1]

[yocto] ia32-base.inc: Drop glibc --with-tls option, its now the only option for glibc

2012-08-21 Thread Richard Purdie
it. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org diff --git a/conf/machine/include/ia32-base.inc b/conf/machine/include/ia32-base.inc index 99ac352..17ff714 100644 --- a/conf/machine/include/ia32-base.inc +++ b/conf/machine/include/ia32-base.inc @@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ SERIAL_CONSOLE

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] mpc8315: build u-boot v2012.04 by default.

2012-07-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 20:01 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: Validated on real hardware: U-Boot 2012.04.01 (Jun 29 2012 - 13:48:03)MPC83XX Reset Status: Software Hard, External/Internal Soft, External/Internal Hard CPU: e300c3, MPC8315E, Rev: 1.2 at 400 MHz, CSB: 133.333 MHz

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] RFC: [PATCH 1/1] toolchain-scripts: Sync the SDK/ADT values to the build system

2012-07-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:54 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: The build system passes specific TUNE (fundamental) flag values to various tools instead of using a shell wrapper or similar. It is important that the build system and ADT/SDK match the behaviors exactly, or we are likely to have

Re: [yocto] [opkg-utils][PATCH 0/2] opkg-utils fix for python-2.6 and fix for missing getopts

2012-06-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 17:34 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: The following changes since commit 44df9dd3dc411ca1255cb4b23bde7eb71aed4778: opkg-make-index: disable filelist by default (2012-04-26 11:39:42 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://github.com/shr-project/opkg-utils

Re: [yocto] Discussion: Package testing

2012-06-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 15:26 +0200, Björn Stenberg wrote: Many source packages include their own package test suites. We are looking at running these tests on target in a structured way, and I would like a discussion about how to best fit this into the Yocto framework. The actions that need

Re: [yocto] RFC: poky-tiny: init procedure

2012-06-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 14:10 -0700, Tim Bird wrote: One of our early efforts, getting busybox to not fork commands in init scripts that it had as builtins, proved to be a significant feature that is still valuable today to improve boot time. I'd add that one thing we did with Poky's init

Re: [yocto] question about devtools-native tasks

2012-06-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 20:48 +0900, Bongseo Jang wrote: Hi All, I'm watching console output of 'bitbake minimal-core-image' It starts with getting native devtools like, NOTE: Running task 1 of 63 (ID: 11, /home/bsjang/poky/meta/recipes-devtools/quilt/quilt-native_0.60.bb, do_fetch)

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] gitignore: add wildcard to match toplevel patch files

2012-06-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 12:10 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: To support the basic workflow of trivial patches: git format-patch HEAD~.. ; git send-email --to f...@bar.com 0001-foo.patch We don't want git status reporting on patches lying in the top level dir in this case. Merged to master,

Re: [yocto] ALT_SRC_URI ?

2012-05-30 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 16:08 +, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 9:20 AM, David Nyström david.nyst...@enea.com wrote: Hi, Since meta-fsl-ppc:s git daemon(git://git.freescale.com) was down, I experimented with adding the http reference as a mirror.

Re: [yocto] Is it not necessary to sudo dpkg-reconfigure dash with Poky 1.2 on Ubuntu 12.04

2012-05-02 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 08:18 -0700, Osier-mixon, Jeffrey wrote: Good catch. I'm still installing 12.04 and can't check at the moment, but there is an easy way to tell: file /bin/sh If it points to bash you should be fine, if it points to dash then you'll need to reconfigure. Please let me

[yocto] 1.3 Planning Process

2012-05-01 Thread Richard Purdie
I just wanted to highlight that the planning process for the next Yocto Project release (tentatively '1.3') is well under way now. I sent out a previous email about this but this is a quick reminder. We use the bugzilla (bugzilla.yoctoproject.org) to track proposed ideas and these will ultimately

Re: [yocto] [Yocto-infrastructure] Bugzilla Upgrade Complete

2012-04-30 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 13:17 -0700, Michael Halstead wrote: The upgrade to Bugzilla 4.2.1 is complete. The upgrade completed with 0 errors and 0 warnings. Total downtime was 6 minutes. I am still working on smoothly re-categorizing and renaming classifications, products, and components. Here

Re: [yocto] Build time data

2012-04-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 18:18 +0530, Joshua Immanuel wrote: Hello, On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 09:45 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: There are undoubtedly ways we can improve performance but I think we've done the low hanging fruit and we need some fresh ideas. Is there a way to integrate distcc

[yocto] Yocto Project 1.2 Release Status

2012-04-18 Thread Richard Purdie
I thought I'd update everyone with the current 1.2 status. I'm going to branch master for release at this point. We've fixed a lot of issues, I'm hoping the -rc4 build will be a good one. There are signs there are some more minor issues around and bugs do keep getting opened. These are still

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Yocto Project 1.2 Release Status

2012-04-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 16:53 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 03:47:47PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: I thought I'd update everyone with the current 1.2 status. I'm going to branch master for release at this point. We've fixed a lot of issues, I'm hoping the -rc4 build

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Yocto Project 1.2 Release Status

2012-04-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 09:22 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 16:53 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 03:47:47PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: I thought I'd update

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Yocto Project 1.2 Release Status

2012-04-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 10:11 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Chris Larson clar...@kergoth.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 09:22 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: On Wed, Apr 18

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/1] [1.2] poky-tiny: Separate the libc features required for meta-toolchain

2012-04-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 18:06 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: This addresses [YOCTO #2295], in which the meta-toolchain target would fail for the poky-tiny DISTRO definition due to its reduced libc feature set. This is not an optimal solution as it significantly increases the size of the C

Re: [yocto] Writing do_install_append for target and virtclass-native in a bbappend

2012-04-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 20:32 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: I'm trying to address a symlink naming issue in the bzip2 package when used with Chrome. Chrome is looking for a specific soname, which the default install of bzip2 doesn't setup. I can address this easily by adding the symlink via a bzip2

Re: [yocto] Writing do_install_append for target and virtclass-native in a bbappend

2012-04-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 10:32 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Monday 16 April 2012 20:32:25 Darren Hart wrote: I'm trying to address a symlink naming issue in the bzip2 package when used with Chrome. Chrome is looking for a specific soname, which the default install of bzip2 doesn't setup. I

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/3] kernel26 cleanup

2012-04-17 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2012-04-16 at 22:29 -0500, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com This (post-1.2) patchset removes the last vestiges of kernel26 from poky. The following changes since commit c936fca6e163bc19bc08cbd0036b31ca6f6c3ed6: Richard Purdie (1

Re: [yocto] native recipe and sysroot-destdir troubles

2012-04-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 17:17 -0400, Philip Tricca wrote: Worked out a solution to this issue. For the sake of brevity it can be found here: http://twobit.us/blog/2012/04/openembedded-yocto-native-hello-world/ So just to follow up here too for the list archives: This “craziness” does have a

Re: [yocto] bitbake gets confused with ~/user-config.jam

2012-04-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 11:53 +0200, Johannes König wrote: Hi, It seems that bitbake (or more precisely the boost_1.44.0.bb recipe) gets confused with an user-config.jam file in the users home directory. When trying to build core-image-sato (or zypper) the build aborts due to an error in

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/4] yocto-bsp fixes

2012-04-14 Thread Richard Purdie
, Tom The following changes since commit 6703173449ad21e1623ac75a66535cb2ed52aeeb: Richard Purdie (1): package_rpm.bbclass: Set tmppath for rpm to somewhere which won't conflict with the rootfs are available in the git repository at: git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib.git

Re: [yocto] Build time data

2012-04-13 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 07:34 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: On 04/12/2012 07:08 AM, Björn Stenberg wrote: Darren Hart wrote: /dev/md0/build ext4 noauto,noatime,nodiratime,commit=6000 A minor detail: 'nodiratime' is a subset of 'noatime', so there is no need to specify

Re: [yocto] Moving angstrom under the yocto banner

2012-04-02 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 21:08 -0700, Matthew McClintock wrote: I think we should consider a standard way of integrating layers and other bits. One method is (and I'm not recommending it) using 'git submodules' - another is 'androids repo command'. If all the distros (poky, angstrom, MEL, etc)

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] meta-yocto/local.conf.sample: change = to ?= for BB_NUMBER_THREADS and PARALLEL_MAKE

2012-04-02 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 17:23 +0800, Shane Wang wrote: In the current local.conf, BB_NUMBER_THREADS and PARALLEL_MAKE are assigned by '=', which overwrites the values set from the Hob. To avoid that, use '?=' instead. [Yocto #2210] Signed-off-by: Shane Wang shane.w...@intel.com ---

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto-tiny: Prefer 3.2

2012-04-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sun, 2012-04-01 at 00:23 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: With the move to 3.2 from 3.0 in oe-core, the 3.0 no longer exists. Prefer 3.2 instead. Signed-off-by: Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com --- meta-yocto/conf/distro/poky-tiny.conf |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1

Re: [yocto] Moving angstrom under the yocto banner

2012-03-31 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 20:00 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: Not to be terribly pendatic or difficult here, but technically, the comparison you make here doesn't ring true. bitbake in poky *still* has changes that never went into the upstream repository. I was surprised to hear that but its easy

Re: [yocto] FW: tentative list of vars to be dropped from variable glossary

2012-03-30 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 16:08 -0600, Scott Rifenbark wrote: See chapter 4 of the dev manual (http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/dev-manual/dev-manual.html) for this adjustment. Looks good but can you change the title to say Excluding Recipes From the Build :) Cheers, Richard

Re: [yocto] Moving angstrom under the yocto banner

2012-03-30 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 15:18 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: On 3/30/12 2:33 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 12:26 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven: On 3/30/12 1:44 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: Hi, RP said I should raise this on the yocto lists, so here it is: The Angstrom core

Re: [yocto] tentative list of vars to be dropped from variable glossary

2012-03-29 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 16:50 -0700, Rudolf Streif wrote: Thanks, Richard. Clearer now but not entirely. BBMASK removes recipes from being parsed. It does not remove them from images although that would I guess be an indirect result since

Re: [yocto] pseudo interaction issue

2012-03-26 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 02:43 -0500, Peter Seebach wrote: On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:15:15 + Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: This implies that once we enable pseudo for a child, there is some change in the parent which persists. Hmm. Is the parent running

Re: [yocto] pseudo interaction issue

2012-03-26 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 11:44 -0500, Peter Seebach wrote: On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:41:43 + Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: One or the other of the above on their own doesn't do this. Funky. That's very strange. I wouldn't have expected LOCALSTATEDIR to have any

Re: [yocto] pseudo interaction issue

2012-03-26 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 12:18 -0500, Peter Seebach wrote: On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:47:29 +0100 Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: This is pretty much what we do at the moment, it gets unset after we load. Pseudo is of course disabled at this point. I guess we just

Re: [yocto] tentative list of vars to be dropped from variable glossary

2012-03-26 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 12:42 -0700, Rudolf Streif wrote: Another variable that seems to be dropped from the latest 1.1.1 revision of the Reference Manual is BBMASK. In previous versions of the manual it was explained that this variable can be used to remove packages from images. However, that

Re: [yocto] tentative list of vars to be dropped from variable glossary

2012-03-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 05:27 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: finished perusing ref manual variable glossary and here's my list of variables that would appear to be dead and should be dropped from the glossary:

Re: [yocto] pseudo interaction issue

2012-03-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 17:45 -0500, Peter Seebach wrote: On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 12:20:08 + Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote: On Friday 23 March 2012 02:16:35 Peter Seebach wrote: Still really weird to me that I can't reproduce this outside of hob. I am pretty sure

Re: [yocto] pseudo interaction issue

2012-03-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 17:15 +, Richard Purdie wrote: What puzzles me is we get this value from envbackup[key] = os.environ.get(PSEUDO_PREFIX) so its already not in the environment. So basically if we read PSEUDO_PREFIX from the environment we get nothing. If we unset the value back

Re: [yocto] Yocto weekly bug trend charts -- WW11

2012-03-19 Thread Richard Purdie
Hi Jiajun, On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 08:49 +, Xu, Jiajun wrote: The overall open bug trend increased a lot in last week. The new submitted vs. fixed bug number is 64 vs. 52. Some fixed bugs are enhancement bug, which are not calculated into WDD data. WDD number and Open Bug number are

Re: [yocto] Yocto weekly bug trend charts -- WW11

2012-03-19 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 10:13 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: On 03/19/2012 09:18 AM, Stewart, David C wrote: From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Jiajun Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 8:33 AM BTW, when I check the open bug data, I find

Re: [yocto] COMPATIBLE_HOST in initramfs-live-install_1.0.bb

2012-02-29 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 14:46 +0800, Xu, Dongxiao wrote: I saw in initramfs-live-install_1.0.bb recipe, there is a line to set the COMPATIBLE_HOST: COMPATIBLE_HOST = (i.86|x86_64).*-linux But actually initramfs-live-install is set as dependency in core-image-minimal-initramfs.bb. Therefore

Re: [yocto] [glib]glib-2.0 install fail

2012-02-27 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 13:06 +0800, Ni Qingliang wrote: Hi, All: after latest update, the glib-2.0 install fail with err info: rmdir: failed to remove `.../tmp/work/x86_64-linux/glib-2.0-native-1_2.30.2-r6/image/.../tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/lib/gio/modules/': Directory not empty I

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] poky-tiny: Assume pkgconfig is provided

2012-02-26 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 08:29 -0800, Darren Hart wrote: -dev packages require pkgconfig, but it pulls in glib-dbus-shadow which breaks with tiny's minimal libc. -dev packages are not currently supported on poky-tiny. Proposed-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] meta-yocto/local.conf.sample.extended: add LICENSE_FLAGS_WHITELIST section

2012-02-02 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 18:28 -0600, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote: From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com Add a new section for LICENSE_FLAGS_WHITELIST, containing a list of the current packages with LICENSE_FLAGS. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com ---

Re: [yocto] creating global variables in a recipes

2012-02-02 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 11:50 -0500, William Mills wrote: I am not sure I can give you a better option that local.conf but I can explain why what your doing does not work. It may feel from your usage that the image recipe is the ancestor of all the recipes but this is really not true. The

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] distro: Add poky-tiny distro definition

2012-01-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 15:37 -0800, Darren Hart wrote: Poky-tiny is intended for building very small OS images. The distro definition sets the providers for the kernel and the runtime services. It also drops NLS support and reduces the eglibc component list and other DISTRO_FEATURE elements.

Re: [yocto] [PATCH V3 0/3] New distribution definition for poky-tiny

2012-01-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 03:12 +0100, Leon Woestenberg wrote: Ah, I missed this line: o Read-only or RAMFS root filesystem However, our recipes in many ways depend on write behaviour on first boot. When under classic OE, I always had to verify each recipe for correct operation for ro

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 2/3] distro: Add poky-tiny distro definition

2012-01-04 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 14:56 +0100, Leon Woestenberg wrote: Darren, On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: Poky-tiny is intended for building very small OS images. The distro definition sets the providers for the kernel and the

Re: [yocto] [CONSOLIDATED PULL (meta-yocto) 0/4]

2012-01-03 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 08:18 -0800, Saul Wold wrote: Richard, This is the meta-yocto patches that coordiate with the oe-core changes you have already pulled. Sau! The following changes since commit f3a1a8897c78e116d7d28947a85687d0ce9d7df7: pseudo: ensure libs are included in package

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 6/9] distro: Factor out poky-common.inc from poky.conf

2011-12-21 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 01:02 -0800, Darren Hart wrote: Prepare to add additional poky distro variants by factoring out assignments common to all poky* distros into poky-common.inc. Things like the naming schemes, mirrors, etc. are common, while dependencies and other things impacting image

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] fri2: Add linux-yocto-tiny bbappend

2011-12-21 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 01:09 -0800, Darren Hart wrote: Provide a bbappend for linux-yocto-tiny with support EFI, SATA, and the EG20T. This includes EFI framebuffer and USB HID support which normally would be omitted from a tiny kernel, but it is our only functional console as the serial port

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] fri2: Add linux-yocto-tiny bbappend

2011-12-21 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 09:05 -0800, Darren Hart wrote: On 12/21/2011 08:59 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 01:09 -0800, Darren Hart wrote: Provide a bbappend for linux-yocto-tiny with support EFI, SATA, and the EG20T. This includes EFI framebuffer and USB HID support

Re: [yocto] Raspberry Pi

2011-12-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 21:47 +, Chris Tapp wrote: Is anyone on this list considering (or working on) a BSP for the Raspberry Pi (http://www.raspberrypi.org/faqs) ? For those that haven't seen it, it's a credit-card sized 'home pc' aimed primarily at educational users that includes a

Re: [yocto] The role of distro and image

2011-12-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 15:56 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 10:54 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Koen Kooi k...@beagleboard.org wrote: Op 13 dec. 2011

Re: [yocto] The role of distro and image

2011-12-13 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 12:23 -0800, Darren Hart wrote: I'm trying to wrap up my work on meta-tiny and integrate it into poky proper. I'm having some difficulty drawing a line between the responsibility of the distro definition versus that of the image definition. For example, if I define a

Re: [yocto] SRCREV variable

2011-11-26 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 15:19 -0800, Saxena, Rahul wrote: Can anyone explain how to set the SRCREV variable for a recipe ? I get a error: “Please Set SRCREV to a valid value” Could you post some logs of the build showing this problem please? For example if my source is MesaLib-7.9.tar.bz2

Re: [yocto] why do numerous .bb files set PARALLEL_MAKE?

2011-11-07 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 17:07 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 11:57:46AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: stumbled over this so i did a more thorough search: $ grep -w PARALLEL_MAKE $(find . -name *.bb) ./meta/recipes-qt/qt-apps/qmmp_0.5.1.bb:PARALLEL_MAKE =

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] Fix HOMEPAGE values in libzypp and sat-solver .bb files

2011-11-01 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 13:27 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: Fix obvious typoes in .bb files for libzypp and sat-solver packages, and update the HOMEPAGE for sat-solver to refer to the sat-solver home page itself, rather than the libzypp home page. Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day

Re: [yocto] Questions from a greenhorn about build problems

2011-10-20 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 14:43 +0200, Rainer Koenig wrote: I'm using yoctoproject since one week now and got the latest yocto-1.1/edison-6.0 git tree. I have been able to build core-image-sato for the Beagleboard xM rev. A and the image works fine. Now my next goal is to build an image for the

Re: [yocto] RFC: User configurable recipe features

2011-10-11 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 11:41 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: As part of working on meta-tiny, I've come across a need (want?) to present users with the ability to select some set of features in a local configuration file that will impact the build of the image and a set of recipes. It is currently

<    1   2   3   4   5   >