Re: [yocto] Building a out of tree kernel module on target system

I have this all standardized for BBB, and here are pointers how to build an out of tree kernel module on BBB target system (with some specifics): local.conf (with added systemd service): https://github.com/ZoranStojsavljevic/bbb-yocto/blob/master/bbb-releases/bbb-warrior/local.conf_full Compiling

Re: [yocto] No providers found in RDEPENDS_datatransfer-mgr? [file-rdeps]

;libzippp" Hope this helps! Cheers, Zoran ___ On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:29 AM Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > > Hello Simon, > > I'll try to help you today. I am more (99%) BSP guy. There are much > more versatile people for rootfs DEPENDS and RDEPENDS. > > Good pr

[yocto] No providers found in RDEPENDS_datatransfer-mgr? [file-rdeps]

From: SIMON BABY Date: Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:14 AM Subject: Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] Error trying to generate Raspberry Pi initramfs To: Zoran Stojsavljevic Hello Zoran, I am new to yocto and trying to fix the below build issue. Can you please help. ERROR: datatransfer-mgr-1.0-r1 do_packa

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] Confusion about U-Boot setup

layering. ;-) My two cent worth thinking (at least from R&D perspective), Zoran ___ On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 11:25 PM Greg Wilson-Lindberg wrote: > > > -Original Message----- > > From: Zoran Stojsavljevic [mailto:zoran.stojsavlje...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, Se

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] Confusion about U-Boot setup

> There should be some way to change the u-boot delay that waits > for user input, among other things, I just haven't been able to find > it yet and was wondering if someone could point me to where it > can be found. Jesus Christ's, Greg?! This is what you should look for (exact string): #define

Re: [yocto] WARNING: bluez5-5.50-r0 do_fetch: Failed to fetch URL file://variscite-bt.conf

en the name you should ask the > variscite-bsp-platform maintainers. > > Ross > > On 27/08/2019 06:51, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > > BTW, I have created the complete description of this problem! > > https://github.com/ZoranStojsavljevic/imx6-sabre-automotive-bsp/tree/master/

Re: [yocto] QA Issue: Files/directories were installed but not shipped

Maybe this web pointer to similar problem can help you (as a reference examlpe)?! https://yocto.yoctoproject.narkive.com/20hVZuCp/files-directories-were-installed-but-not-shipped Zoran ___ On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 7:21 AM SIMON BABY wrote: > > Hello, > > I am getting "ERROR: QA Issue: File

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] Error trying to generate Raspberry Pi initramfs

pi] to the as I have realized that some might have > missed this Raspberry-pi specific question. > > Thanks, > Greg Wilson-Lindberg > > > -----Original Message- > > From: Zoran Stojsavljevic [mailto:zoran.stojsavlje...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 2

Re: [yocto] Error trying to generate Raspberry Pi initramfs

Three things: [1] The initramfs is NOT the initrd (te second one is the temp stage in booting the linux to mmcblk...); [2] There are some config parameters you need to set up in your kernel .config file: https://github.com/ZoranStojsavljevic/bbb-yocto/blob/master/custom/config-in

Re: [yocto] WARNING: bluez5-5.50-r0 do_fetch: Failed to fetch URL file://variscite-bt.conf

BTW, I have created the complete description of this problem! https://github.com/ZoranStojsavljevic/imx6-sabre-automotive-bsp/tree/master/Issues Best Regards, Zoran ___ On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 5:23 PM Zoran Stojsavljevic < zoran.stojsavlje...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Folks, > &

[yocto] WARNING: bluez5-5.50-r0 do_fetch: Failed to fetch URL file://variscite-bt.conf

Hello Folks, While doing the following YOCTO build: http://variwiki.com/index.php?title=Yocto_Build_Release&release=RELEASE_MORTY_V1 Actually, using the latest available tag: thud-fslc-4.14.78-mx6ul-v1.1

Re: [yocto] Yocto repos for NXP referent platform MCIMXABASEV1 also called SABRE platform?

Hello Khem, Thank you for the reply. I would say look at: https://github.com/ZoranStojsavljevic/imx6-sabre-automotive-bsp Zoran ___ On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:51 PM Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 11:20 PM Zoran Stojsavljevic > wrote: > > > > Hello to all, >

[yocto] Yocto repos for NXP referent platform MCIMXABASEV1 also called SABRE platform?

Hello to all, I am trying to find out some recent yocto repo, which contains YOCTO reference repo for the following NXP board: MCIMXABASEV1 also called SABRE platform. Here is one repo I found reading this document... But this is too outdated! http://events17.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/fil

Re: [yocto] How to fix SSH interfactive promotion for Yocto Linux embedded system

Hope this helps. Zoran ___ On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 5:00 AM Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > > > scp -o ServerAliveInterval=60 -o ExitOnForwardFailure=yes -o > > ServerAliveCountMax=3 -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -o > > UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null ... > > Format of

Re: [yocto] How to fix SSH interfactive promotion for Yocto Linux embedded system

> scp -o ServerAliveInterval=60 -o ExitOnForwardFailure=yes -o > ServerAliveCountMax=3 -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -o > UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null ... Format of your command is wrong... scp assumes your options as files to be transferred. You need to compile better command, something like:

Re: [yocto] Building for AM335x with meta-ti and meta-qt5

> I am trying to build a Yocto (warrior) image for the AM335x using meta-ti > and meta-qt5 that will render directly to the GPU. Initially this will be > for the > Beaglebone Black but then ultimately will be for a custom hardware platform. For the starters, check this out! Not really what you w

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] RFC: dropping official support for Debian 8 / Opensuse 42.3

> Fedora 28 is also unsupported (but will be the basis of CentOS 8). Yesterday I upgraded my host Fedora 29 to Fedora 30. With Fedora, all clear. F30 is the newest release, F31 is in preparation. F28 support ceased to exist one month after F30 was released. The algorithm is the following: Support

Re: [yocto] Can't boot to initramfs

; On 7/12/19, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > > Moritz, > > > > Thank you very much for this reply. It makes it very clear... What is > > the current State of Affairs for the topic. > > > > Let us see if there will be the improvement to this topic. I'll > &

[yocto] [Meta-Qt5] "Unknown Module: declarative" Error While Creating Toolchain

Hello Max, Remember me? Zoran Stojsavljevic, from very far in Past... From Y2017! Could you, please, help Onur with this problem? I know that U R Subject Matter Expert with iMX6 and Qt5, and probably U already met this problem not too far in The Past... Please, could you read carefully the

Re: [yocto] Can't boot to initramfs

iter and the most important thing: > >>> > >>> PACKAGE_INSTALL += "initramfs-module-debug" (To my understanding this > >>> enables the rescue shell) > >>> > >>> On 12.07.19 08:22, Moritz Porst wrote: > >>>> Hey, &

Re: [yocto] Can't boot to initramfs

x27;t work) or in the > rescue shell (initramfs works). > > In the end I actually managed to get a working shell, but I often ended > up in initramfs telling me "dropping to shell..." but then freezing. > > I don't have access to my files right now but I can tell y

Re: [yocto] Can't boot to initramfs

nce you've edited > the kernel line. Now, as my understanding is, you solved this problem actually adding to grub.cfg in command kernel line break=premount, and was able to stop in rescue shell?! Am I correct here? Thank you, Zoran ___ On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 4:33 PM Moritz Porst wro

Re: [yocto] [Meta-Qt5] "Unknown Module: declarative" Error While Creating Toolchain

X > I have built a system with qt5 recipes, but cannot create a toolchain > for it since a week ago. Am I retarded? > > Have a lovely day! > Onur > > Zoran Stojsavljevic , 9 Tem 2019 Sal, 12:47 > tarihinde şunu yazdı: >> >> One thing on my prio list is to buy very p

Re: [yocto] Stuck to build zImage-initramfs

= "-initramfs", it looks like > very close to generate zImage-initramfs, but I could still not get it > :-(. > > Thank you very much. > > On 7/9/19, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > > Please, read the following thread: > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/

Re: [yocto] Stuck to build zImage-initramfs

Please, read the following thread: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-July/041680.html Zoran ___ On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:43 PM JH wrote: > > Hi, > > I have been stuck to build zImage-initramfs for weeks. I've read Yocto > latest document, but still failed to generate the i

Re: [yocto] [Meta-Qt5] "Unknown Module: declarative" Error While Creating Toolchain

One thing on my prio list is to buy very powerful 16 or 32 INTEL core 6950 or + server. Maybe AMD Ryzen 32 or 64 core (most likely). This almost eliminates this build problem... But in the current situation I am presently, I could not even buy extra bubble gum. ;-) I have only my HP Elite Book 840

Re: [yocto] [Meta-Qt5] "Unknown Module: declarative" Error While Creating Toolchain

nt as PM accidentally. > Thanks anyway! > Onur > > Zoran Stojsavljevic , 9 Tem 2019 Sal, 10:59 > tarihinde şunu yazdı: >> >> Maybe this: >> https://www.technexion.com/support/knowledgebase/resolving-dependencies-issues-in-yocto/ >> >> Zoran >>

Re: [yocto] [Meta-Qt5] "Unknown Module: declarative" Error While Creating Toolchain

Maybe this: https://www.technexion.com/support/knowledgebase/resolving-dependencies-issues-in-yocto/ Zoran ___ On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 7:59 AM Onur Eser wrote: > > Hello All, > > I have talked to my BSP provider and they have solved the conflict files > issue with an update. Now I am able to

Re: [yocto] Ddcutil

Devendra, Maciej was very very kind to you, and all of us, observinf YOCTO Project. Could you, please, test Maciej's patches, and give us the report what did you find? Thank you, Zoran ___ On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 2:37 PM Maciej Pijanowski wrote: > > > On 08.07.201

Re: [yocto] Ddcutil

>> It was never polished for upstream... Why? Any viable reason(s)? >>... and it likely have some issues with the latest ddcutil releases. Which issues? Could you, Maciej, please, explain/elaborate theme/problems observed by you in more details? Thank you, Zoran ___ On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at

Re: [yocto] dev_pkgs feature caused conflict

Hello Onur, It was quite a while (almost two years) I experimented with IMX6 Colibri from Toradex. Here is what I have used to build tools using the following Toradex pointer (from one of my private Github specimens): OpenEmbedded (core): http://developer.toradex.com/knowledge-base/board-support-

Re: [yocto] Json-Glib failed to build during the building of Weston image

PM Onur Eser wrote: > > Thanks everyone, the problem was a line missing in my local.conf file. Now > understand what is wrong. My image is booting! Thanks again, have a good dai! > > Zoran Stojsavljevic , 4 Tem 2019 Per, 15:22 > tarihinde şunu yazdı: >> >> > West

Re: [yocto] Json-Glib failed to build during the building of Weston image

xt harder and more challenging step, Weston protocol. But this is only me and my thinking. ;-) Zoran ___ On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 12:16 PM Burton, Ross wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at 10:43, Zoran Stojsavljevic > wrote: > > Why Weston protocol? Why not classical X11 Client

Re: [yocto] Json-Glib failed to build during the building of Weston image

, Zoran. > Onur > > > > Kimden: Burton, Ross > Gönderme tarihi: Perşembe, Temmuz 4, 2019 1:16 ÖS > Kime: Zoran Stojsavljevic > Bilgi: Onur Eser; Yocto Project > Konu: Re: [yocto] Json-Glib failed to build during the building of Weston > image > > On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at

Re: [yocto] Json-Glib failed to build during the building of Weston image

t; SYS info: > closx@closx-pc:~$ uname -a > Linux closx-pc 4.15.0-54-generic #58~16.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jun 24 13:21:41 > UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > Onur > > Zoran Stojsavljevic , 4 Tem 2019 Per, 12:43 > tarihinde şunu yazdı: >> >> Hello Onur, >

Re: [yocto] Json-Glib failed to build during the building of Weston image

Hello Onur, Why Weston protocol? Why not classical X11 Client Server in user space? Which DeskTop are U using in Ur YOCTO build? Thank you, Zoran ___ On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 10:46 AM Onur Eser wrote: > > Hello Yocto Community! > When I was trying to build core-image-weston with meta-qt5 an

Re: [yocto] Anyone built Yocto with Qt5 layer for imx6?

https://developer.toradex.com/knowledge-base/board-support-package/openembedded-(core)#Adding_the_Qt5_Layer Zoran ___ On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 2:53 AM Gaurav Kalra wrote: > > > > > Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2019 17:48:23 +0300 > > From: Onur Eser > > To: yocto@yoctoproject.org > > Subject: [yocto] An

Re: [yocto] Poky build errors, help is needed

Please, try to check trijicon.com firewall: which services are available, which are not. Please, read the following: https://serverfault.com/questions/309052/check-if-port-is-open-or-closed-on-a-linux-server And also the following: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers P

Re: [yocto] QA notification for completed autobuilder build (yocto-2.7.1.rc1)

>> Runtime auto test for following platforms: >> 1. MinnowTurbot 32-bit (Appolo Lake?) >> 2. Coffee Lake (14nm 4th tock in the row) >> 3. NUC 7 >> 4. NUC 6 >> 5. Edgerouter >> 6. MPC8315e-rdb >> 7. BeagleboneHm... At least first four from the list are IA (INTEL Architecture)... Maybe even fift

Re: [yocto] Can't boot to initramfs

the last message > in the log: EXT4-fs (sdb2): re-mounted. Opts: (null) The rootfs partition is > always 2, so either /dev/sda2 or /dev/sdb2 (when booting from stick) On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 11:20 AM Moritz Porst wrote: > > Hello Zoran, > thanks for your answer > &

Re: [yocto] Copying the binaries to an SD card after bulding with Yocto

>> ~/bbb/meta-bbb/scripts$ export OETMP=/oe7/bbb/tmp-warrior >> Then run the copy_boot.sh script passing the location of SD card I forgot how inheritance schema works with shells. When you run copy_boot.sh script, it'll spawn for you new shell, and, IIRC, it should inherit OETMP from parent shell.

Re: [yocto] [yocto-builds] Yocto build Issue

Some hints again... > I am adding IMAGE_INSTALL_append = "kernel-modules" in local.conf. > When i build with bitbake core-image-minimal command this kernel > module is loading.while i build with bitbake atmel-qt5-demo-image > command kernel module is not loading. > Please tell us what is the issu

Re: [yocto] Can't boot to initramfs

> INITRAMFS_IMAGE = *"core-image-minimal-initramfs"* > INITRAMFS_IMAGE_BUNDLE = "1" ... > You can find the /var/log/dmesg here: https://pastebin.com/ya7iCtq7I Some hints... [1] Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/bzImage root=PARTUUID=71d1d94a-83e8-4895-98eb-35309f58119f break=premount quiet rootwai

Re: [yocto] Recursions problem with pre-built versioned libraries and oe_soinstall

> You've replied to my email to the Yocto mailing list, regarding a > problem I'm having with Yocto, by suggesting I email this list if I > have a problem with Yocto. You can't deny that this is a symlink loop. On a higher level! ;-) Zoran ___ On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 12:39 PM John McCabe wr

Re: [yocto] yocto recipe error

> alexander.l.elli...@navy.mil One honest advise. Please. use alexander.l.elli...@gmail.com... Much healthier/relaxed, don't you agree? ;-) Thank you, Zoran ___ On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 6:47 PM Elliott, Alexander L CIV USN NAVSURFWARCEN DAH VA (USA) wrote: > > Hello, > > I am very new to Yo

Re: [yocto] cortexa9t2hf instead of cortexa9hf

a wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 08:47:32PM +0200, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > > > Just ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET to "arm" which will give you "cortexa9hf" again > > > (not "armv7a"). > > > > I think this is impossible for the current s

Re: [yocto] cortexa9t2hf instead of cortexa9hf

> Just ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET to "arm" which will give you "cortexa9hf" again > (not "armv7a"). I think this is impossible for the current state of YOCTO affairs. I do not think bitbake is able to determine type of arm silicon, since it needs to implement the following instruction somewhere beneath (

Re: [yocto] cortexa9t2hf instead of cortexa9hf

> Because of that I copied Alex and Ross to CC: into email, so they > should unveil this mystery (I would prefer "armv7" to stay in bitbake > 1.42, since A8 and A9 belongs to armv7, A15 belongs to armv8 (IIRC). Sorry, my bad. A15 still belongs to armv7. And now I see/understand why you removed "ar

Re: [yocto] cortexa9t2hf instead of cortexa9hf

Hello Arno, Let me try to explain my point of view. Since here (my best guess) we have some asynchronous bitbake code which went South upon introducing T2 HW extension. Point [1]: as far as I understand arm, cortexa9t2hf is is just a superset of previous cortexa9hf (HW wise). NEON HW extension (N

Re: [yocto] [meta-swupdate] failed update leads to kernel panic

orst wrote: > > Hi Zoran > > On 17.06.19 12:55, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > > I have a feeling that I misunderstand something about the ramdisk. > To my understanding this is the microcode.cpio file which is invoked > lastly in the grub entry. > > Being you, I w

Re: [yocto] cortexa9t2hf instead of cortexa9hf

Hello Arno, Your question, per say, has little to do with YOCTO forum. But I'll try (as my best) to answer your question. Cortexa9hf should be armv7 A9 Hard Floating (it contains HW FP unit). Cortexa9t2hf is by analogy armv7 A9 T2 Hard Floating. Now, the question is what is T2? T2 is addition to

Re: [yocto] [meta-swupdate] failed update leads to kernel panic

config in meta-swupdate which is > basically the swupdate config that comes from menuconfig. I let this > untouched but since this is not the kernel defconfig I guess you didn't > mean this file ? > > Additionally I can't mount the rootfs with the failed boot so I can

Re: [yocto] [meta-swupdate] failed update leads to kernel panic

> However if I abort the update while running (i.e. simulating a power cut) > and then reboot I end up in a kernel panic: "Unable to mount rootfs on > unknown block". My understanding is that I should at least end up in a > busybox or that the update is retried, but this does not happen. You misse

Re: [yocto] Command to make zimage to ramdisk format

Here is what you need (my best guess): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2018-July/041680.html Please, read carefully this thread. Zoran ___ On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 1:35 PM JH wrote: > > Hi, > > I built the Yocto images: > > dev-image-20190528085324.rootfs.wic.gz > zImage--xxx

[yocto] [current stable poky kernel] linux-stable-5.0.21-r0

Hello to all, I did (an hour ago) quick git pull on the several git repos for my BBB target platform. But I still see that the poky kernel is still one of 5.0 series! Why? There are already well known stable kernels series 5.1 (5.1.9). Please, check kernel.org: https://www.kernel.org/ What is t

[yocto] Fwd: Potential (?) systemd YOCTO problems

k you again, Zoran ___ On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 9:07 PM Morné Lamprecht wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 07:38:47PM +0200, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > >Still. I expected to see the following on the > >target (my BBB): /etc/init.d/networking script, > > I would have a

[yocto] Potential (?) systemd YOCTO problems

Hello Folks, I am a bit deeper to the systemd service investigation in YOCTO. I installed systemd service, I also have network manager package. I am using warrior. Here are the snippets of the HOST: [user@fedora29-ssd build]$ bitbake --version BitBake Build Tool Core version 1.42.0 [user@fedora29

Re: [yocto] How to extract files from wic.gz image?

This web page can help you (my best guess): https://github.com/FrankBau/meta-marsboard-bsp/wiki/Prepare-SD-card Zoran ___ On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 2:22 PM JH wrote: > > Hi, > > What command and tools to extract files from Yocto / bitbake image > such as dev-image-20190528085324.rootfs.wic.gz?

Re: [yocto] Building Out-of-Tree Modules on the BBB Target

ld > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 7:24 AM Zoran Stojsavljevic >> wrote: >>> >>> As I said, I am a man of experimental try-outs. And here is the try! >>> >>> Now, after setting sources, I tried to compile the examp

Re: [yocto] Building Out-of-Tree Modules on the BBB Target

ome investigation as well) ___ On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 2:48 PM Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 9:00 PM Khem Raj wrote: >> >> >> >> On 5/23/19 3:32 AM, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: >> > After some tests (and I had other problems to take ca

Re: [yocto] Building Out-of-Tree Modules on the BBB Target

You are free to try example on YOCTO and Embedded Debian yourselves! Zoran ___ On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 6:37 AM Khem Raj wrote: > > > On 5/23/19 9:14 PM, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > > > I think this is a fair suggestion. Having prebuilt kernel available > > > that c

Re: [yocto] Building Out-of-Tree Modules on the BBB Target

t YOCTO kernels are less/smaller in size, but how smaller?) Zoran ___ On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 3:00 AM Khem Raj wrote: > > > On 5/23/19 3:32 AM, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > > After some tests (and I had other problems to take care of, as well), > > here is the followin

Re: [yocto] Building Out-of-Tree Modules on the BBB Target

modules out of the tree on the target with minimal mpact to rootfs! Thank you, Zoran Stojsavljevic ___ On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:04 AM Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 4:09 PM Zoran Stojsavljevic > wrote: >> >> > The core-image-kernel-d

Re: [yocto] Building Out-of-Tree Modules on the BBB Target

-in layer hello-world driver example. Since I (or you name the person) have own test drivers, which will be imported out of tree, externally, to the target test bed! Just thinking loud... Zoran ___ On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 4:25 PM Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 15, 2019

Re: [yocto] Building Out-of-Tree Modules on the BBB Target

ange it on Poky (as a Referent example)? Thank you, Zoran ___ On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 7:41 AM Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 1:30 PM Zoran Stojsavljevic < > zoran.stojsavlje...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello Chris, Bruce, >> >> I have some

Re: [yocto] Building Out-of-Tree Modules on the BBB Target

tup-cortexa8hf-neon-poky-linux-gnueabi > cd /opt/poky/2.6.2/sysroots/cortexa8hf-neon-poky-linux-gnueabi > cd /usr/src/kernel > make oldconfig scripts > exit > > Finally, build your module using a Makefile like this > > obj-m := hello-mod.o > all: > make -C

Re: [yocto] Building Out-of-Tree Modules on the BBB Target

cd /usr/src/kernel > make oldconfig scripts > exit > > Finally, build your module using a Makefile like this > > obj-m := hello-mod.o > all: > make -C $(SDKTARGETSYSROOT)/usr/src/kernel M=$(shell pwd) > > > HTH, > Chris > > On 12/05/2019 11:53,

Re: [yocto] patchwork

Off Topic @: The same chaos as with German Govt. (KVR and Finanzamt). Zoran ___ On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 8:05 PM akuster808 wrote: > > ok, so no Admins. This is unexceptionable. > > OE TSC and Board, I believe its your time to get involved. > > regards, > Armin > > On 5/3/19 10:18 AM, akuster

[yocto] Building Out-of-Tree Modules on the BBB Target

Hello to the YOCTO community, I am using (to build the target for Beagle Bone Black) the following script: https://github.com/ZoranStojsavljevic/bbb-yocto https://github.com/ZoranStojsavljevic/bbb-yocto/blob/master/bbb-yocto.sh The latest kernel I am using from the following repo: https://github.

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] meta-yocto-bsp: Bump to the latest stable kernel for all the BSP

There is always around, lurking, the replacement crew... Please, do not forget about that! And the replacement crew is always ahead... ;-) Zoran ___ On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 9:32 PM Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 12:30 PM Zoran Stojsavljevic > wr

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] meta-yocto-bsp: Bump to the latest stable kernel for all the BSP

>From yesterday... Latest stable release of: https://github.com/jumpnow/meta-bbb My GitHub for BBB (BeagleBone Black): https://github.com/ZoranStojsavljevic/bbb-yocto Both worked out for my bash script (adopted for my needs -> sticks and ropes) and KAS tool! https://github.com/ZoranStojsavljevic/

Re: [yocto] Eclipse (plugin, settings)

https://marc.info/?l=openembedded-core&m=155482339222316&w=2 (do not shoot the messenger, thank you) Zoran ___ On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 1:11 PM Arno Steffens wrote: > > I want to use Eclipse as IDE for coding/debugging. > What do I have to set to get the proper compiler prefixes and pathes, l

Re: [yocto] yocto sumo - upgrading gcc from 7.3 to 8.3 fails - C compiler cannot create executables

Hello Eric, Please, could you try gcc 8.2? Thank you, Zoran ___ On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 6:28 PM Eric Grunt wrote: > > Hi, > > I tried to upgrade gcc from 7.3 to 8.3 by copying > gcc directory from https://github.com/openembedded/openembedded-core.git > (openembedded-core/meta/recipes-devtool

Re: [yocto] ERROR: Multiple .bb files are due to be built which each provide virtual/libgbm

> I do some configuration in the local.conf, bblayers.conf,\ > custom-recipe *(Polycaptil-image-minimal),* machine.conf, ... > to prepare and build my custom linux system for am335x > processor (custom board based on the ti am335x-evmsk > starter kit dev board). I would advise you to do Polycaptil

Re: [yocto] fitImage: hangs at "Starting kernel ..."

-open 0 0nandwrite -p /dev/mtd-open > fitImage-core-image-base-delta-ag6248c-poe.binsync; sync}hw_load() { > echo "nand read \$loadaddr open 0x100 && run fpboot && bootm"} > > I'll attach the log from when I install the image to when it the

Re: [yocto] fitImage: hangs at "Starting kernel ..."

Hello PierLuigi, [1] Which arm platform (based upon which arm Open Sorce platform) you are using? [2] Please, can we see your added proprietary ash script to U-Boot default env? Thank you, Zoran ___ On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 5:13 PM Pierluigi Greto wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm trying to build a

Re: [yocto] Thud Kernel Configuration not Working

> This is my bbappend called linux-yocto-4.1.8.bbappend: > # Include kernel configuration fragment > FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:" > SRC_URL += "file://smp.cfg" I am wondering... Why so old kernel used (4.1.8)? Zoran ___ On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 3:54 AM nick wrote: > > Gree

Re: [yocto] [meta-yocto-bsp][PATCH v2] beaglebone-yocto: Update u-boot config to match u-boot 19.04

no Babic wrote: > > Hi Zoran, > > On 12/04/19 09:00, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > > Hello to all, > > > > I will ask few questions here regarding U-Boot, since U-Boot mailing > > list is too frequent/clogged... > > > > Apropos (Regarding to) U-Boot 201

Re: [yocto] [meta-yocto-bsp][PATCH v2] beaglebone-yocto: Update u-boot config to match u-boot 19.04

e exercise, won't you all agree!? ;-) Thank you, Zoran Stojsavljevic ___ On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 12:09 AM Alistair Francis wrote: > > [YOCTO #13145] > > This was announced at 2019.01: > https://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg305424.html > > Basically

Re: [yocto] yocto touchscreen

gt; Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, > > (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, > > (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. > > (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Wed Apr 3 08:25:25 2

Re: [yocto] Yocto General purpose evaluation

> Background/requirements > Currently using Debian OS on my prototype build based on a > Beaglebone green wireless. > Custom software is constructed in java. > System utilizes 9 axis accelerometer, vibration sensor, Bluetooth, > WiFi, LTE-M, GNSS, power management (through BB I2c and > GPIO c

Re: [yocto] yocto touchscreen

g to migrate to > the thud version. > > > > I will maybe try to use Bugzilla > > > > Nikola > > *De :* Zoran Stojsavljevic > *Envoyé :* mardi 5 février 2019 19:28 > *À :* Stanisavljevic > *Cc :* Yocto Project ; marc.ferl...@gmail.com > *Objet :* Re: [y

Re: [yocto] yocto touchscreen

ora/root rd.lvm.lv=fedora/swap rhgb quiet LANG=en_US.UTF-8 [26.955] Build Date: 11 January 2019 12:47:38PM *[26.955] Build ID: xorg-x11-se**rver 1.20.3-3.fc29* [26.955] Current version of pixman: 0.34.0 Best Regards, Zoran ___ On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 2:49 PM Zoran Stojs

Re: [yocto] yocto touchscreen

lable modes" > Maybe it was changed between krogoth and sumo version...but I don't know > where it is indicated if sources files... > > What do you think ? problem can be around the screen resolution, screen > frequency and adc touchscreen ? > > Nikola > > -Mess

Re: [yocto] yocto touchscreen

> I built a first version of this os with version krogoth and it works fine. > > Now I build a second version of this os with version sumo and the > touch screen works fine during boot process but when kernel is > loaded, touchscreen freeze / lock and impossible to use it. Did you compare Krogoth

Re: [yocto] cannelloni.bb (Was: [Chicken and Egg problem] Defining RDEPENDS of the package itself)

Since no reply for socket-can strategy... I long time ago created one for by me and my needs. But still... Here is something worth nothing, if anybody considers socket-can domain! https://github.com/ZoranStojsavljevic/meta-socketcan Best Regards, Zoran Stojsavljevic ___ On Thu, Jul 19

Re: [yocto] Systemd service recipe fails while booting from initramfs

t; [Network] > DHCP=yes > > Then I hope you will get your interface up with DHCP. > > Regards, > /Peter > > > > On 2019-01-22 17:45, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 5:38 PM Zoran > Stojsavljevic > wrote: > > Hello N

Re: [yocto] Systemd service recipe fails while booting from initramfs

ference=/etc/resolv.conf' > > BusyBox v1.29.2 (2019-01-19 17:24:17 UTC) multi-call binary. > > > > Usage: chown [-Rh]... USER[:[GRP]] FILE... > > chmod: unrecognized option '--reference=/etc/resolv.conf' > > BusyBox v1.29.2 (2019

Re: [yocto] Systemd service recipe fails while booting from initramfs

oun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto: > yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Zoran Stojsavljevic > Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 7:56 AM > > [...] > > > While downloading initramfs on the target system, while bringing kernel > up, the following > > happened (actual

[yocto] Systemd service recipe fails while booting from initramfs

Hello to all, I have added to my local.conf the following lines in order to port systemd service in YOCTO (Thud release): *## Add systemd serviceVIRTUAL-RUNTIME_init_manager = "systemd"VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_dev_manager = "systemd"DISTRO_FEATURES_BACKFILL_CONSIDERED = "sysvinit"VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_init

Re: [yocto] Change SH to BASH

Did not understand the question? On your Debian (or Ubuntu) host, you need to do the following: sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install bash And then, this net pointer: https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1932504 Something like that. If I understood correctly. Zoran ___ On Mon, Ja

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

image-minimal and core-image-base). This is ONLY applicable for Beagle Bone Black platform, one widely used as Open Source referent platform. Thank you all, Zoran Stojsavljevic ___ On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 1:51 PM Burton, Ross wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 12:42, Zoran Stojsavljev

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

ov 28, 2018 at 7:37 PM Beth Flanagan wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 9:18 AM Zoran Stojsavljevic > wrote: > > > > Hello YOCTO people, > > > > I would like to use standard git tool while using all the Yocto > > layers. NOT only Poky repository (which, I believe

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

ink so. For me, kernel.org tree perfectly works, and it is perfectly aligned with git commands and .git directory. With ALL git commands I am using. Thank you, Zoran Stojsavljevic ___ On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 2:11 PM Nicolas Dechesne wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 1:53 PM Zoran Stojs

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

OK, I rest my case. Seems, that I am the only one here using git describe, and git log using tags. Could be. ;-) Thank you all, Zoran ___ On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 1:53 PM Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > > > This is what your opinion is. Which seems to be vastly overestimating its

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

nges I have. So this is why I sent initial email, in first place, Thank you, Zoran ___ On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 12:25 PM Josef Holzmayr wrote: > > Hello Zoran, > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 12:00:22PM +0100, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > > I am (almost) perfectly aligned with kerne

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

on, Ross wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 11:22, Zoran Stojsavljevic > wrote: > > Since with git I can do almost whatever with kernel.org (and > > derivatives, all known distros) git... Very opposite to YOCTO. And I > > like git, It is VERY powerful. Maybe I finally started t

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

ou want a repository management tool, then pick one and use it. > > Ross > On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 11:01, Zoran Stojsavljevic > wrote: > > > > Hello Stefano, > > > > I am (almost) perfectly aligned with kernel.org, and I (personally) > > decided to use git.

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

n The Future. Thank you, Zoran ___ On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 10:52 AM Stefano Babic wrote: > > Hi Zoran, > > On 28/11/18 10:17, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > > Hello YOCTO people, > > > > I would like to use standard git tool while using all the Yocto > > layers. N

[yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

edora28-ssd meta-bbb]$ git describe fatal: No names found, cannot describe anything. [user@fedora28-ssd meta-bbb]$ The rationale behind this request: git is the powerful tool which should work and be solely used for YOCTO layers' synchronization. In other words, YOCTO should give some tools&#

  1   2   3   >