Robert Berger wrote:
> Are your scripts available somewhere to give it a try? Do they integrate
> into autobuilder?
The scripts are hardcoded for our environment and our modified autobuilder and
are therefore not published anywhere.
While I could see us publishing these or similar snippets, I th
Hi,
On 08/12/2013 12:44 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>
> There's not much on the autobuilder side apart from ensuring the appropriate
> configuration is set - one of the aims was to avoid too much intrusion into
> the
> autobuilder code. The main class is testimage.bbclass, so you can just do
> I
Hi,
On 08/12/2013 12:28 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>
> I agree. In fact our test lab would probably be limited to the reference
> boards that the Yocto Project officially supports within meta-yocto i.e. what
> we
> currently test on manually.
I have the Yocto reference boards as well, but will
Hi,
On 08/12/2013 02:30 PM, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Paul Eggleton wrote:
>> Right, that's what we would be aiming for. Perhaps you could talk a little
>> bit about how you manage your hardware testing and any additional software
>> and scripts you make use of there?
>
> We run our tests from buil
Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Right, that's what we would be aiming for. Perhaps you could talk a little
> bit about how you manage your hardware testing and any additional software
> and scripts you make use of there?
We run our tests from buildbot, using an expect script to allocate the right
serial p
On Sunday 11 August 2013 10:03:12 Robert Berger wrote:
> On 08/10/2013 01:02 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > The new framework replaces the old, is written in python and makes writing
> > tests much easier. As a result we are going through a process of adding
> > many more runtime tests than we had pr
Hi Björn,
On Monday 12 August 2013 11:11:45 Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > We do definitely want automated testing on real hardware; it's just that
> > that it presents a number of problems that need solving:
> > * How do you deploy the image/kernel/bootloader onto the board in
Paul Eggleton wrote:
> We do definitely want automated testing on real hardware; it's just that
> that it presents a number of problems that need solving:
>
> * How do you deploy the image/kernel/bootloader onto the board in an
> automated manner? To different kinds of boards?
> * How do you ma
Hi,
On 08/10/2013 01:02 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
>
> The new framework replaces the old, is written in python and makes writing
> tests much easier. As a result we are going through a process of adding many
> more runtime tests than we had previously.
I'm confused now. Is it autobuilder + new
Hi Robert,
On Saturday 10 August 2013 10:20:54 Robert Berger wrote:
> On 08/10/2013 03:22 AM, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
> > * Infrastructure for automated QA testing. More testcases will be
> > automated in the next milestone release.
>
> Are we talking about test automation using autobuilder he
Hi,
On 08/10/2013 03:22 AM, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
> * Infrastructure for automated QA testing. More testcases will be
> automated in the next milestone release.
Are we talking about test automation using autobuilder here?
As far as I can see runtime testing of images using QEMU is
planned/al
Hello,
The latest milestone release of the Yocto Project's upcoming 1.5 release, is now
available for download at:
http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/yocto/milestones/yocto-1.5-m3/poky.tar.bz2
Thanks go out to everyone for all their hard work during this milestone release!
Sincerely,
E
12 matches
Mail list logo
