On 05/08/2017 08:36 AM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 15:12 -0600, Aníbal Limón wrote:
>> +try:
>> +ldata = bb.parse.handle(lconf, ldata, include=True)
>> +except BaseException as exc:
>> +raise LayerError(exc)
>
> Anibal, where is this LayerError class in c
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 15:12 -0600, Aníbal Limón wrote:
> +try:
> +ldata = bb.parse.handle(lconf, ldata, include=True)
> +except BaseException as exc:
> +raise LayerError(exc)
Anibal, where is this LayerError class in compatlayer/__init__.py
supposed to come from? It doesn't
On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 16:01 +, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 16:51 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 15:12 +, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 08:10 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Is the "build single distro for differe
On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 16:51 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 15:12 +, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 08:10 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > >
> > > Is the "build single distro for different machines" scenario that
> > > I
> > > described part of the Yocto
On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 15:12 +, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 08:10 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > Is the "build single distro for different machines" scenario that I
> > described part of the Yocto Compliance 2.0? Should there be tests for
> > it?
>
> Right now its not
Okay, s
On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 08:10 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 04:00 +, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 21:09 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 15:12 -0600, Aníbal Limón wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > common.test_signatures: Tes
On Wed, 2017-03-01 at 04:00 +, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 21:09 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 15:12 -0600, Aníbal Limón wrote:
> > >
> > > common.test_signatures: Test executed in BSP and DISTRO layers to
> > > review
> > > doesn't comes with recip
On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 21:09 +0100, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 15:12 -0600, Aníbal Limón wrote:
> >
> > common.test_signatures: Test executed in BSP and DISTRO layers to
> > review
> > doesn't comes with recipes that changes the signatures.
> I have a question about the goal fo
On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 14:33 -0600, Aníbal Limón wrote:
>
> On 02/28/2017 02:09 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 15:12 -0600, Aníbal Limón wrote:
> >> common.test_signatures: Test executed in BSP and DISTRO layers to review
> >> doesn't comes with recipes that changes the signa
On 02/28/2017 02:09 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 15:12 -0600, Aníbal Limón wrote:
>> common.test_signatures: Test executed in BSP and DISTRO layers to review
>> doesn't comes with recipes that changes the signatures.
>
> I have a question about the goal for this test: is i
On Mon, 2017-02-20 at 15:12 -0600, Aníbal Limón wrote:
> common.test_signatures: Test executed in BSP and DISTRO layers to review
> doesn't comes with recipes that changes the signatures.
I have a question about the goal for this test: is it meant to detect
layers which incorrectly change the
11 matches
Mail list logo
