On 28 Mar 2014 16:24, "Otavio Salvador" wrote:
>
> Hello David,
>
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:47 AM, David Nyström
wrote:
> > On 2014-03-25 15:31, David Nyström wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2014-03-24 17:00, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >>>
> >>> As development on 1.6 finishes up, its time to think about what
Hello David,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 7:47 AM, David Nyström wrote:
> On 2014-03-25 15:31, David Nyström wrote:
>>
>> On 2014-03-24 17:00, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>>
>>> As development on 1.6 finishes up, its time to think about what we
>>> should be doing in the 1.7 cycle.
>>>
>>> I think from my
On 2014-03-25 15:31, David Nyström wrote:
On 2014-03-24 17:00, Richard Purdie wrote:
As development on 1.6 finishes up, its time to think about what we
should be doing in the 1.7 cycle.
I think from my perspective, in 1.7 I'd like to see us looking at
"Developer Workflow". Its a generic topic w
On 03/25/2014 07:31 AM, David Nyström wrote:
> On 2014-03-24 17:00, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> As development on 1.6 finishes up, its time to think about what we
>> should be doing in the 1.7 cycle.
>>
>> I think from my perspective, in 1.7 I'd like to see us looking at
>> "Developer Workflow". Its a
On 2014-03-24 17:00, Richard Purdie wrote:
As development on 1.6 finishes up, its time to think about what we
should be doing in the 1.7 cycle.
I think from my perspective, in 1.7 I'd like to see us looking at
"Developer Workflow". Its a generic topic which I think covered multiple
areas (in no
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Richard Purdie
wrote:
> As development on 1.6 finishes up, its time to think about what we
> should be doing in the 1.7 cycle.
>
> I think from my perspective, in 1.7 I'd like to see us looking at
> "Developer Workflow". Its a generic topic which I think covered mu
