On 11-08-05 2:10 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-08-05 01:55 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
On 08/05/2011 01:38 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-08-05 01:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2011 10:58 PM, jingdong...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Jingdong Lu
On 11-08-05 01:55 PM, Philip Balister wrote:
On 08/05/2011 01:38 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-08-05 01:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2011 10:58 PM, jingdong...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Jingdong Lu
Add pandaboard bsp
why not use meta-ti ?
On 08/05/2011 01:38 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 11-08-05 01:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2011 10:58 PM, jingdong...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Jingdong Lu
Add pandaboard bsp
why not use meta-ti ?
I'm hoping to not repeat all the discussion
On 11-08-05 01:34 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2011 10:58 PM, jingdong...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Jingdong Lu
Add pandaboard bsp
why not use meta-ti ?
I'm hoping to not repeat all the discussions that we've had
around the beagle board here.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2011 10:58 PM, jingdong...@windriver.com wrote:
> From: Jingdong Lu
>
> Add pandaboard bsp
why not use meta-ti ?
>
> Jingdong Lu (1): pandaboard: add pandaboard bsp
>
> .../bsp/pandaboard/pandaboard-non_hardware.cfg | 30 ++
> .../
From: Jingdong Lu
Add pandaboard bsp
Jingdong Lu (1):
pandaboard: add pandaboard bsp
.../bsp/pandaboard/pandaboard-non_hardware.cfg | 30 ++
.../bsp/pandaboard/pandaboard-standard.scc |7 +
.../cfg/kernel-cache/bsp/pandaboard/pandaboard.cfg | 346
.../
