On Thursday, 22 June 2017 12:55:15 PM CEST Robert Yang wrote:
> On 06/21/2017 10:31 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 13 June 2017 4:36:51 AM CEST Robert Yang wrote:
> >> Note, we have to move the location of tinfiol's code to make it can be
> >> shutdown correctly.
> >
> > How does this re
On 06/21/2017 10:31 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 June 2017 4:36:51 AM CEST Robert Yang wrote:
The branch is not needed any more when it has been removed from the repo, so
we also need remove its layerbranch, otherwise it still can be got from the
web, which causes confusions.
I thi
On Tuesday, 13 June 2017 4:36:51 AM CEST Robert Yang wrote:
> The branch is not needed any more when it has been removed from the repo, so
> we also need remove its layerbranch, otherwise it still can be got from the
> web, which causes confusions.
I think I'd previously avoided this since I was
The branch is not needed any more when it has been removed from the repo, so we
also need remove its layerbranch, otherwise it still can be got from the web,
which causes confusions.
Note, we have to move the location of tinfiol's code to make it can be shutdown
correctly.
Signed-off-by: Robert Y
