Re: [yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record defined" failure for core-image-minimal

2014-05-09 Thread Bryan Evenson
Brian, > -Original Message- > From: Brian Karcz [mailto:bri...@russound.com] > Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 3:49 PM > To: Bryan Evenson; Bruce Ashfield; yocto@yoctoproject.org > Subject: RE: [yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record > defined" fa

Re: [yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record defined" failure for core-image-minimal

2014-05-09 Thread Brian Karcz
urve might have steepened a bit. Thanks, Brian -Original Message- From: Bryan Evenson [mailto:beven...@melinkcorp.com] Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 3:31 PM To: Bruce Ashfield; Brian Karcz; yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: RE: [yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record defined&quo

Re: [yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record defined" failure for core-image-minimal

2014-05-09 Thread Bryan Evenson
ld and poke around in for some guidance. My > ultimate goal is to port the at91sam9x5ek machine definition to one for the > at91sam9g20ek demo board and then port THAT over to a custom machine > based roughly off that reference design. > > > > > > -Original Message---

Re: [yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record defined" failure for core-image-minimal

2014-05-09 Thread Brian Karcz
in why there is no machine record macro being declared. I'll keep digging... Thanks, Brian -Original Message- From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 2:42 PM To: Brian Karcz; yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] [meta-atmel] at91s

Re: [yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record defined" failure for core-image-minimal

2014-05-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
2014 9:55 AM To: Brian Karcz; yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record defined" failure for core-image-minimal On 14-05-09 09:44 AM, Brian Karcz wrote: Hi, Not sure if this is the correct place to email this, but I've seen a few othe

Re: [yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record defined" failure for core-image-minimal

2014-05-09 Thread Brian Karcz
to] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record defined" failure for core-image-minimal On 14-05-09 09:44 AM, Brian Karcz wrote: > Hi, > > Not sure if this is the correct place to email this, but I've seen a > few other meta-atmel references so I figured I'd give it a

Re: [yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record defined" failure for core-image-minimal

2014-05-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-05-09 09:44 AM, Brian Karcz wrote: Hi, Not sure if this is the correct place to email this, but I’ve seen a few other meta-atmel references so I figured I’d give it a shot. I’m attempting to setup a core-image-minimal build using the guidelines in the meta-atmel README for the at91sam9x5e

[yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record defined" failure for core-image-minimal

2014-05-09 Thread Brian Karcz
Hi, Not sure if this is the correct place to email this, but I've seen a few other meta-atmel references so I figured I'd give it a shot. I'm attempting to setup a core-image-minimal build using the guidelines in the meta-atmel README for the at91sam9x5ek machine type. When the kernel build goe