. Vincent
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Tapp [mailto:opensou...@keylevel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 7:44 AM
> To: Cheah, Vincent Beng Keat
> Cc: Yocto Project ; Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun
> ; Paul Eggleton
> ; meta-in...@yoctoproject.org
&g
ah, Vincent Beng Keat
Cc: Yocto Project ; Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun
; Paul Eggleton
; meta-in...@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] [meta-intel] "Crazy" Xorg memory usage after upgrading
from Daisy to Fido
Hi Vincent,
I may have made some progress. The undesirable memory usage with
Hi Vincent,
I may have made some progress. The undesirable memory usage within Xorg isn’t
there if I create an xorg.conf file containing:
Section “Device”
Identifier “Intel Video”
Driver “intel”
Option “TearFree” “true"
EndSection
So it looks as if I need to enable “TearFree”. I didn’t ne
Hi Vincent,
I’ve finally got back to being able to investigate this further.
I’ve now moved on to “jethro” and I’m seeing exactly the same behaviour. I’ve
tried with kernel versions 3.14.39, 3.19.5 and 4.1.8.
> On 10 Jun 2015, at 03:50, Cheah, Vincent Beng Keat
> wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I
Hi Vincent,
> On 10 Jun 2015, at 03:50, Cheah, Vincent Beng Keat
> wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I don’t have any idea with regard to the issue that you are getting below.
> All the work that we are doing here so far is on CHV (yocto-kernel-3.19.5
> standard/base branch).
>
> From your statement
Hi Chris,
I don’t have any idea with regard to the issue that you are getting below. All
the work that we are doing here so far is on CHV (yocto-kernel-3.19.5
standard/base branch).
From your statement below, it looks to me that you are upgrading meta-intel
from Daisy to Fido branch which are
Hi Vincent,
Can you help to comment on this issue mentioned by Chris?
Thanks.
Regards,
Rebecca
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Eggleton [mailto:paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: 09 June, 2015 12:15 AM
> To: Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun
> Cc: meta-in...@yoctoproject.org; Chris Tapp; Yoc
Rebecca, is this something you or one of your colleagues would be able to help
with?
Thanks,
Paul
On Friday 05 June 2015 08:29:00 Chris Tapp wrote:
> I’ve got an application that I’ve had running nicely under Daisy for some
> time. As Daisy is now a bit old, I decided to move the application to
