Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberry-pi] needing newer or patched version of g++

2017-10-07 Thread Khem Raj
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Bill Jenkins wrote: > >> On Sep 15, 2017, at 8:02 AM, Bill Jenkins wrote: >> >> >>> On Sep 15, 2017, at 7:43 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Bill Jenkins wrote:

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberry-pi] needing newer or patched version of g++

2017-09-15 Thread Bill Jenkins
> On Sep 15, 2017, at 7:43 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Bill Jenkins wrote: >> >>> On Sep 15, 2017, at 6:54 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Bill Jenkins

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberry-pi] needing newer or patched version of g++

2017-09-15 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Bill Jenkins wrote: > >> On Sep 15, 2017, at 6:54 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Bill Jenkins wrote: >>> After creating an SDK for a 32-bit Raspberry Pi3 target, I ran into the

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberry-pi] needing newer or patched version of g++

2017-09-15 Thread Bill Jenkins
> On Sep 15, 2017, at 6:54 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Bill Jenkins wrote: >> After creating an SDK for a 32-bit Raspberry Pi3 target, I ran into the >> following compiler error when >> compiling an application using the SDK:

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberry-pi] needing newer or patched version of g++

2017-09-15 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:14 PM, Bill Jenkins wrote: > After creating an SDK for a 32-bit Raspberry Pi3 target, I ran into the > following compiler error when > compiling an application using the SDK: > > internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn

[yocto] [meta-raspberry-pi] needing newer or patched version of g++

2017-09-14 Thread Bill Jenkins
After creating an SDK for a 32-bit Raspberry Pi3 target, I ran into the following compiler error when compiling an application using the SDK: internal compiler error: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90) It turns out that a patch was submitted for g++ early last year