On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Jan Schmidt thay...@noraisin.net wrote:
Hi Andrei,
Thanks for the reminder - I did find the problem with the original
patch, but didn't send it through yet. The problem was using du on a
sparse file and getting the size-on-disk, not the apparent size -
Any news on this. Still waiting for patches :)
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Jan Schmidt thay...@noraisin.net wrote:
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 13:32 +0200, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:17:57PM +1100, Jan Schmidt wrote:
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 00:47 +0200, Andrei Gherzan
Hi Andrei,
Thanks for the reminder - I did find the problem with the original
patch, but didn't send it through yet. The problem was using du on a
sparse file and getting the size-on-disk, not the apparent size - making
the resulting partition too small. Using du -bks gets the correct size.
J.
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:17:57PM +1100, Jan Schmidt wrote:
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 00:47 +0200, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:18:24PM +1100, Jan Schmidt wrote:
When constructing the SD card image, the code was using
the inherited ROOTFS_SIZE, which is the size of the
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 13:32 +0200, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:17:57PM +1100, Jan Schmidt wrote:
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 00:47 +0200, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:18:24PM +1100, Jan Schmidt wrote:
When constructing the SD card image, the code was
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 02:19 +0200, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Jan Schmidt thay...@noraisin.net
wrote:
This is a good idea but you will have to align the new ROOTFS_SIZE
to IMAGE_ROOTFS_ALIGNMENT.
+ SDIMG_SIZE=$(expr ${IMAGE_ROOTFS_ALIGNMENT} +
On Jan 26, 2013 10:53 AM, Jan Schmidt thay...@noraisin.net wrote:
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 02:19 +0200, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Jan Schmidt thay...@noraisin.net
wrote:
This is a good idea but you will have to align the new ROOTFS_SIZE
to
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 12:26 +0200, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
On Jan 26, 2013 10:53 AM, Jan Schmidt thay...@noraisin.net wrote:
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 02:19 +0200, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Jan Schmidt
thay...@noraisin.net
wrote:
This is a good idea
When constructing the SD card image, the code was using
the inherited ROOTFS_SIZE, which is the size of the
rootfs contents. When building (for example) a compressed
rootfs, this allocates a partition much larger than necessary.
Instead, take the size of the generated rootfs file that is
about to
When constructing the SD card image, the code was using
the inherited ROOTFS_SIZE, which is the size of the
rootfs contents. When building (for example) a compressed
rootfs, this allocates a partition much larger than necessary.
Instead, take the size of the generated rootfs file that is
about to
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Jan Schmidt thay...@noraisin.net wrote:
When constructing the SD card image, the code was using
the inherited ROOTFS_SIZE, which is the size of the
rootfs contents. When building (for example) a compressed
rootfs, this allocates a partition much larger than
11 matches
Mail list logo
