Hi all,
Sorry, I found that rk-linux.inc could be moved to distro conf .
I know why you guys are opposed to it now.
I will remove it from machine conf, but i'm still confused about
whether TUNES is machines specific or distro
specific.
Eddie Cai wrote on 2017年02月09日 16:20:
HI
Hi
2017-02-09 17:18 GMT+08:00 Jacob Chen :
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Eddie Cai wrote on 2017年02月09日 16:20:
>>
>> HI
>>
>> 2017-02-09 14:49 GMT+08:00 Jacob Chen :
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>
>>> Trevor Woerner wrote on 2017年01月28日 03:41:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 27,
Hi,
Eddie Cai wrote on 2017年02月09日 16:20:
HI
2017-02-09 14:49 GMT+08:00 Jacob Chen :
Hi
Trevor Woerner wrote on 2017年01月28日 03:41:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Romain Perier
wrote:
Could you:
- Make one patch per new machine file
HI
2017-02-09 14:49 GMT+08:00 Jacob Chen :
> Hi
>
>
> Trevor Woerner wrote on 2017年01月28日 03:41:
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Romain Perier
> wrote:
>
> Could you:
> - Make one patch per new machine file and not one patch for all new
Hi
Trevor Woerner wrote on 2017年01月28日 03:41:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Romain Perier wrote:
Could you:
- Make one patch per new machine file and not one patch for all new added
machine
Agreed.
Are all of these machines actual devices? The evb one doesn't
Hi all,
Thanks for reviewing, I will looking at comments and suggestions after
the other work finished.
: )
在 2017年01月27日 22:37, Romain Perier 写道:
Hey,
Could you:
- Make one patch per new machine file and not one patch for all new
added machine
- Add a clear @DESCRIPTION for each board,
Hi all,
Thanks for reviewing, I will looking at comments and suggestions after
the other work finished.
: )
在 2017年01月27日 22:37, Romain Perier 写道:
Hey,
Could you:
- Make one patch per new machine file and not one patch for all new
added machine
- Add a clear @DESCRIPTION for each board,
On 1/27/17 11:41 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Romain Perier
> wrote:
>> Could you:
>> - Make one patch per new machine file and not one patch for all new added
>> machine
>
> Agreed.
>
> Are all of these machines actual devices? The
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Romain Perier wrote:
> Could you:
> - Make one patch per new machine file and not one patch for all new added
> machine
Agreed.
Are all of these machines actual devices? The evb one doesn't sound real.
Are all of these machines released
Hey,
Could you:
- Make one patch per new machine file and not one patch for all new added
machine
- Add a clear @DESCRIPTION for each board, see an example here:
https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-rockchip/tree/conf/machine/firefly-rk3288.conf
- Write a clear and an understandable
Evb-rk3288 is the offical evaluate board, add it to help myself develop.
Fennec-rk3288 and Tinker-rk3288 is rk3288 based SBCs.
.
Tinker Boards:
http://www.cnx-software.com/2017/01/05/asus-tinker-board-is-a-raspberry-pi-3-alternative-based-on-rockchip-rk3288-processor/
Signed-off-by: Jacob
11 matches
Mail list logo