On 08/22/2015 12:01 AM, Philip Tricca wrote:
Greetings Wenzong,
On 08/21/2015 02:09 AM, wenzong fan wrote:
On 08/21/2015 10:48 AM, Philip Tricca wrote:
Any opinions / thoughts on this one? I've got an upgrade for the
toolstack (2.3 -> 2.4) ready to go but I've based it on the release URIs
from
Greetings Wenzong,
On 08/21/2015 02:09 AM, wenzong fan wrote:
> On 08/21/2015 10:48 AM, Philip Tricca wrote:
>> Any opinions / thoughts on this one? I've got an upgrade for the
>> toolstack (2.3 -> 2.4) ready to go but I've based it on the release URIs
>> from the wiki so it depends on this patch.
On 08/21/2015 10:48 AM, Philip Tricca wrote:
Any opinions / thoughts on this one? I've got an upgrade for the
toolstack (2.3 -> 2.4) ready to go but I've based it on the release URIs
from the wiki so it depends on this patch.
Hi Philip,
Good to know you have made the selinux toolstack upgrade
Any opinions / thoughts on this one? I've got an upgrade for the
toolstack (2.3 -> 2.4) ready to go but I've based it on the release URIs
from the wiki so it depends on this patch.
Best,
Philip
On 08/15/2015 06:35 AM, Philip Tricca wrote:
> The SRC_URI used for the last SELinux userspace upgrade
The SRC_URI used for the last SELinux userspace upgrade was the
wrong one. We were using the URI generated by GitHub when tags are
added to a repo. These are not the SELinux release tarballs.
The SELinux project generates and releases tarballs for each tool
and posts them to their GitHub wiki 'Rel