On 10/12/18 9:06 AM, Kyle Russell wrote:
> Do you want me to just resent my last two patches? I don't mind if that would
> be easier, and I'll remember to add the Signed-off-by. :)
I was able to pull them from the mailing list archives and have them applied to
my local tree. I have a few other
Do you want me to just resent my last two patches? I don't mind if that
would be easier, and I'll remember to add the Signed-off-by. :)
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 10:00 AM Mark Hatle
wrote:
> On 10/4/18 9:12 AM, Kyle Russell wrote:
> > Hey Mark,
> >
> > Do you think this approach is reasonable?
On 10/4/18 9:12 AM, Kyle Russell wrote:
> Hey Mark,
>
> Do you think this approach is reasonable? If so, I have another patch I'd
> like
> to propose that would enable us to better catch error scenarios (like the last
> two patches address) that we might encounter during do_image_prelink. We
Hey Mark,
Do you think this approach is reasonable? If so, I have another patch I'd
like to propose that would enable us to better catch error scenarios (like
the last two patches address) that we might encounter during
do_image_prelink. We just happened to detect these last two issues even
binutils-2.28 (17026142ef35b62ac88bfe517b4160614902cb28) adds support
for copying read-only dynamic symbols into .data.rel.ro instead of .bss
since .bss is technically writable. This causes prelink to error out on
any binary containing COPY relocations in .data.rel.ro.
Read-only variables
