Re: [yocto] [warrior] [meta-qt4] 3rdparty: javascriptcore: JITStubs.cpp: allow builds of JavaScriptCore with gcc v8

2019-11-20 Thread Quentin Schulz
Hi Mike, On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 09:06:08PM +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Hi Mike > > On Wednesday, 20 November 2019 9:00:10 PM NZDT Mike Looijmans wrote: > > I ran into this issue yesterday, and this patch solves the compilation on > > warrior. However, it's a patch for Qt itself, and not for O

Re: [yocto] [warrior] [meta-qt4] 3rdparty: javascriptcore: JITStubs.cpp: allow builds of JavaScriptCore with gcc v8

2019-11-20 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hi Mike On Wednesday, 20 November 2019 9:00:10 PM NZDT Mike Looijmans wrote: > I ran into this issue yesterday, and this patch solves the compilation on > warrior. However, it's a patch for Qt itself, and not for OE. > > Is there already a warrior patch in the making, or should I submit one? Qu

Re: [yocto] [warrior] [meta-qt4] 3rdparty: javascriptcore: JITStubs.cpp: allow builds of JavaScriptCore with gcc v8

2019-11-20 Thread Mike Looijmans
I ran into this issue yesterday, and this patch solves the compilation on warrior. However, it's a patch for Qt itself, and not for OE. Is there already a warrior patch in the making, or should I submit one? On 19-11-19 13:37, Quentin Schulz wrote: > At least since gcc v8, source code with asm

[yocto] [warrior] [meta-qt4] 3rdparty: javascriptcore: JITStubs.cpp: allow builds of JavaScriptCore with gcc v8

2019-11-19 Thread Quentin Schulz
At least since gcc v8, source code with asm volatile won't compile anymore. The volatile qualifier anyway is a no-op since asm blocks are implicitly volatile as written in the documentation[1]. Let's get rid of this redundant qualifier so we can build with newer GCCs. The resulting error message