.derr...@lge.com)"
Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org"
Subject: Re: [yocto] Alternative to _git.bb convention for unstable versions?
You can easily add .inc file which will set all the PREFERRED_VERSIONs for all
components you need and then the users will just add an "require"
anced Platform(keith.derr...@lge.com)"
Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org"
Subject: Re: [yocto] Alternative to _git.bb convention for unstable versions?
You can easily add .inc file which will set all the PREFERRED_VERSIONs for all
components you need and then the users will just add an &q
You can easily add .inc file which will set all the PREFERRED_VERSIONs for
all components you need and then the users will just add an "require" of
this .inc files to their local.conf.
"somepackage-unstable.bb" or "somepackage-devel.bb" this will make it 2
different components - not 2 different ve
I am currently creating a new layer (which will eventually be made generally
available). I need to provide both a versioned recipe, and an "unstable" one.
Currently I have somepackage_1.0.bb and somepackage_git.bb which are working
fine.
However, using the "_git" approach (with DEFAULT_PREFE