eywell.com
To: christrobri...@hotmail.com; yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: RE: [yocto] Formulating Recipe for out-of-tree kernel module
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 13:29:30 +
Ok! I better understand your need now.
The fix solves the case where an out of tree module is dependent of a
kernel mo
I suspect the preferred way is to
build in the kernel.
Cheers,Chris
From: joel.espo...@honeywell.com
To: christrobri...@hotmail.com; yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: RE: [yocto] Formulating Recipe for out-of-tree kernel module
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 13:29:30 +
Ok! I better understand you
>;
yocto@yoctoproject.org<mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org>
Subject: RE: [yocto] Formulating Recipe for out-of-tree kernel module
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 10:06:37 +
Hi,
There is a bitbake issue that prevents building an out-of-tree module that is
dependent of another out-of-tree module.
This is
Trobridge
Envoyé : mardi 10 mai 2016 08:59
À : yocto@yoctoproject.org
Objet : Re: [yocto] Formulating Recipe for out-of-tree kernel module
At the risk of answering my own question...
Splitting a driver package into a module recipe and a separate recipe for
user-mode utilities works in that each
this with bitbake could be challenging too.
Cheers,Chris
From: christrobri...@hotmail.com
To: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 12:15:26 +0100
Subject: [yocto] Formulating Recipe for out-of-tree kernel module
I am looking to produce a recipe for the amfeltec usb-fxs adaptor
(http
I am looking to produce a recipe for the amfeltec usb-fxs adaptor
(http://amfeltec.com/products/piranha-usb-fxs-adapter/), with the intention of
contributing this to the meta-telephony layer.
However, I have found a few obstacles to getting a clean recipe:The makefile
produces both a kernel
