FYI,
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:31:43AM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We're in the middle of an upgrade to Thud 2.6.2. While doing so, we
> blindly updated all upstream layers we use and we found out (during
> integration phase, no need to send lawyers :) ) that even though we have
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 17:12, Quentin Schulz <
quentin.sch...@streamunlimited.com> wrote:
> Why do we filter INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE to have only SPDX licenses or
> their aliases (my understanding of respectively SRC_DISTRIBUTE_LICENSES
> and SPDXLICENSEMAP)?
> Is this actually expected?
>
> If it
Hi all,
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 11:31:43AM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We're in the middle of an upgrade to Thud 2.6.2. While doing so, we
> blindly updated all upstream layers we use and we found out (during
> integration phase, no need to send lawyers :) ) that even though we
Hi all,
We're in the middle of an upgrade to Thud 2.6.2. While doing so, we
blindly updated all upstream layers we use and we found out (during
integration phase, no need to send lawyers :) ) that even though we have
GPLv3 in INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE, qt5.11 was built.
conf/local.conf
