[yocto] Kernel config incremental modification not working.

2016-12-08 Thread Bent Bisballe Nyeng
Hi list I am working on a project based on the iMX6UL-EVK using the meta-fsl-arm layer for the kernel. In a local layer I have a bbappend recipe containing a patch for an extra kernel feature (a framebuffer device) in that kernel as well as a .cfg enabling said feature. The bbappend recipe is loca

Re: [yocto] Kernel config incremental modification not working.

2016-12-08 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2016-12-08 09:06 AM, Bent Bisballe Nyeng wrote: Hi list I am working on a project based on the iMX6UL-EVK using the meta-fsl-arm layer for the kernel. In a local layer I have a bbappend recipe containing a patch for an extra kernel feature (a framebuffer device) in that kernel as well as a .c

Re: [yocto] Kernel config incremental modification not working.

2016-12-08 Thread Bent Bisballe Nyeng
On 12/08/2016 05:06 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 2016-12-08 09:06 AM, Bent Bisballe Nyeng wrote: >> Hi list >> >> I am working on a project based on the iMX6UL-EVK using the meta-fsl-arm >> layer for the kernel. >> In a local layer I have a bbappend recipe containing a patch for an >> extra kerne

Re: [yocto] Kernel config incremental modification not working.

2016-12-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2016-12-09 02:25 AM, Bent Bisballe Nyeng wrote: On 12/08/2016 05:06 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2016-12-08 09:06 AM, Bent Bisballe Nyeng wrote: Hi list I am working on a project based on the iMX6UL-EVK using the meta-fsl-arm layer for the kernel. In a local layer I have a bbappend recipe c

Re: [yocto] Kernel config incremental modification not working.

2016-12-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2016-12-09 11:17 AM, Andrea Galbusera wrote: Hi Bruce, On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Bruce Ashfield mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com>> wrote: On 2016-12-08 09:06 AM, Bent Bisballe Nyeng wrote: Hi list I am working on a project based on the iMX6UL-EVK using the

Re: [yocto] Kernel config incremental modification not working.

2016-12-09 Thread Andrea Galbusera
Hi Bruce, On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 2016-12-08 09:06 AM, Bent Bisballe Nyeng wrote: > >> Hi list >> >> I am working on a project based on the iMX6UL-EVK using the meta-fsl-arm >> layer for the kernel. >> In a local layer I have a bbappend recipe containing a patc

Re: [yocto] Kernel config incremental modification not working.

2016-12-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2016-12-09 11:17 AM, Andrea Galbusera wrote: Hi Bruce, On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Bruce Ashfield mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com>> wrote: On 2016-12-08 09:06 AM, Bent Bisballe Nyeng wrote: Hi list I am working on a project based on the iMX6UL-EVK using the

Re: [yocto] Kernel config incremental modification not working.

2016-12-09 Thread Andrea Galbusera
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 2016-12-09 11:17 AM, Andrea Galbusera wrote: > >> Hi Bruce, >> >> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Bruce Ashfield >> mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com>> >> wrote: >> >> On 2016-12-08 09:06 AM, Bent Bisballe Nyeng wrote: >> >>

Re: [yocto] Kernel config incremental modification not working.

2016-12-11 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Fri, 09 Dec 2016 11:19:56 Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 2016-12-09 11:17 AM, Andrea Galbusera wrote: > > Hi Bruce, > > > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Bruce Ashfield > > > > mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com>> wrote: > > On 2016-12-08 09:06 AM, Bent Bisballe Nyeng wrote: > > Hi

Re: [yocto] Kernel config incremental modification not working.

2016-12-12 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2016-12-11 02:33 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Fri, 09 Dec 2016 11:19:56 Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2016-12-09 11:17 AM, Andrea Galbusera wrote: Hi Bruce, On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Bruce Ashfield mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com>> wrote: On 2016-12-08 09:06 AM, Bent Bisballe Nye

Re: [yocto] Kernel config incremental modification not working.

2016-12-12 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 08:41:36 Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On 2016-12-11 02:33 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > Can we please have some automated tests covering all of this? Perhaps it > > would be worth talking to Francisco Pedraza who is looking at adding > > tests under bug > > 6359: > > We are already me