On Wednesday 27 June 2012 11:01:09 Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Paul Eggleton
> wrote:
> > It's something I've been discussing with Joe MacDonald already. I think
> > it's an either-or situation - the recipes will not need to be in both
> > layers. People who want recipes fro
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
>
> It's something I've been discussing with Joe MacDonald already. I think it's
> an either-or situation - the recipes will not need to be in both layers.
> People who want recipes from either or both layers should be able to include
> the lay
On Wednesday 27 June 2012 17:40:44 Jack Mitchell wrote:
> I do agree that layers within layers is a bit confusing, however the
> earlier proposed meta-networking included having some of the
> applications in this proposed layer too. If this was instead, then it's
> fine, but if it's as well then it
On 27/06/2012 17:27, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Wednesday 27 June 2012 16:22:09 Jack Mitchell wrote:
I think this is a fantastic idea in general and if I remember correctly
someone from Linaro was attempting to do something similar to this the
other day - so I can't only be me who would appreciate
On Wednesday 27 June 2012 16:22:09 Jack Mitchell wrote:
> I think this is a fantastic idea in general and if I remember correctly
> someone from Linaro was attempting to do something similar to this the
> other day - so I can't only be me who would appreciate something like this.
Indeed, I saw Mar
On Wednesday 27 June 2012 08:49:22 Khem Raj wrote:
> I think PHP probably is common enough to be part
> of meta-oe or core. instead of lamp call it something else may be
> meta-webservers or something
> and more alternatives can also be put in there
I don't know a huge amount about PHP but it appe
On 27/06/12 16:22, Jack Mitchell wrote:
> Lighttpd (already in core)
> nginx
> Hiawatha (my personal favourite - I have a recipe I already use in
> conjunction with PHP)
I'd add Cherokee to the list; there is a recipe in meta-oe.
Tomas
___
yocto mailing
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Paul Eggleton
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In conjunction with the folks at Wind River I'm currently in the process of
> putting together a layer to support the traditional LAMP stack, and wanted to
> solicit some opinions on how this might be structured/named/etc.
>
> I t
On 27/06/12 15:05, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Hi all,
In conjunction with the folks at Wind River I'm currently in the process of
putting together a layer to support the traditional LAMP stack, and wanted to
solicit some opinions on how this might be structured/named/etc.
I think we have the "L" pret
Hi all,
In conjunction with the folks at Wind River I'm currently in the process of
putting together a layer to support the traditional LAMP stack, and wanted to
solicit some opinions on how this might be structured/named/etc.
I think we have the "L" pretty much covered ;) and we have MySQL in
10 matches
Mail list logo
